Shut Up & Read discussion
Archives
>
What are some book turn-offs before you read?

I pretty much agree with your list. I admit I might unintentionally be a cover snob. Though not the only thing I look at, I would be less inclined to read through a book description with a cartoonish or very plain cover.
The main thing I look at when choosing books is friends' ratings/reviews. I have certain friends here on GR whose reading tastes are very similar to mine, so if a book sounds interesting to me I will look through the reviews for theirs to see what they thought.
The main thing I look at when choosing books is friends' ratings/reviews. I have certain friends here on GR whose reading tastes are very similar to mine, so if a book sounds interesting to me I will look through the reviews for theirs to see what they thought.
As an author and reader I'm a bit shamed to say i'm a book snob. lol I'd rather it be really plain than cheesy or not done well. I try not to judge a book by its cover but it is really hard not to.

One that I disagree with is illustrated cover art. Cartoon-y, or poorly done cover art I'm completely on the same page, but it's actually started to bother me that so many covers today are stock images (that get constantly re-used) or if the book ends up being made into a movie then they stick the actors on the cover. I hate that.
What I'm saying is that an illustrated cover can look terrible if the artist isn't that experienced, but there are also some really awesome illustrated covers. Just look at some of the art in Stephen King's Dark Tower series, or the Harry Potter covers (which are cartoony, but they're so well done).



Personally I don't like stock photos that much, if the cover is generic then what does that say about the book? Or if the cover is badly photoshopped. However, saying that, I won't dismiss a book simply because of that. I will read the blurb or get a sample.



But I have no qualms against illustrated covers, I think they can look pretty cool. Errors are ok so long as they're not glaringly obvious or repetitive.




The overly dramatic blurb is one of them. I understand that the blurb is ment to grip the readers attention but some of them are just too o.t.t for my liking. Or when the blurb only has a sentence of actual storyline and a paragraph full of retorical questions. If It's not a philosophy book, then I don't think it should be asking you so many questions.
Another turn off for me is when is book is very over rated or mainstream. Because if everyone comments on how amazing yet when I read it and don't connect with it at all, I will be very disappointed . :(
But yeah, I know these might be a bit snobby but It's what I personally find to be a turn-off.

(Of course, that's just my experience.)

I agree Alina, I can agree with some of the other comments on here but what's a story without its characters?
K.V. wrote: "When it comes to initially being attracted to a book, I'm definitely a cover snob. Can't help it - if the cover doesn't catch my attention some how, I'll never get as far as reading the blurb. An..."
I agree, I'm terrible if the covers bad the book's bad in my opinion!
I agree, I'm terrible if the covers bad the book's bad in my opinion!

Fantasy books now have:
some one in a cloak looking shifty
a sword
a throne.
Rather generic or cashing in on more famous books. Now I am not saying this is a bad ploy but if I pick up Bob Smith's book simply because it has some cloaked figure on it and I liked one before but I think it will be the same as the famous book and maybe is good in its own right but I want it to be the same as the famous book how does that help the author when I leave a bad review that it wasn't such and such. People judge quickly and make assumptions (often false) on what they will find.
For me what is inside is important, especially for an e-book. If I see a book promoted I might think hmm nice cover or I might read the blurb and not think much of the cover and buy it. I guess everyone is different and opinions of what constitutes a good or bad cover is simply opinion.
Just my tuppence worth:)
Although I do think the cover affects the book, I always read the blurb. But If the blurb doesn't tell me much and the covers not very interesting then that book is not being bought


Yes obvious plots are a pain.



I think all the other covers look exactly the same (like what Alexandra was complaining about above, just with sci-fi instead of fantasy) and that my cover is a refreshing change from the norm, and captures the humor of the book. But if everyone in a niche (military sci-fi here, but could be urban fantasy, historical romance, etc.) is EXPECTING a certain type of cover, do you hurt sales of an indie author if you break with tradition?
Opinions of ravenous readers needed!
Thanks,
Shuvom

Also I have little patience for names I can't pronounce (mostly happens in fantasy/sci fi) so if the first page or so has K*hhgt'x from planet Blggyxfx, I'll pass.
I am a huge cover-judger. But isn't that what the cover's for?? ;)




Haha! That made me laugh. SO true. My uncle and I both read the Wheel of Time series (I think that's what it was) we were trying to have a conversation about it, but neither of knew what the other one was talking about because we pronounced all the names so differently!
And for me, I personally think a bad cover can be the kiss of death for a book. Because I only have, say, ten minutes to browse in the bookstore, I'm just gonna pick up the books that catch my eye. It's like romance, lol, the looks catch your attention first, then you get to know them and fall in love with their personality. Same thing with books.

I've picked up some wonderful books with boring looking covers simply because the title was so interesting and the jacket blurb had a great hook. For instance, I was just rereading Orhan Pamuk's "My Name is Red". I also chose Oliver Sacks' "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat" by the title.

My pet peeve which I only discovered reading Neil Stephenson. Is when a writer uses confusing and big words where a much simpler one would have sufficed. I don't know if that makes me a dummy, but I hate the usage of big words for the sake of it.
I can't stand it when the book has a really vague back description! I will put up with a crude cover, though a good title is a must. However, if the description tells me nothing about the book, or expresses it poorly, or if it's just a bunch of critical praise...that book will have to work a lot harder for my attention.
Unfortunately, romance-y covers also turn me off. I like a bit of a love story, but romance specifically does nothing for me when it's the central plot. It needs complex explorations of human psychology and lots of rich secondary characters if it's a romance~!
Unfortunately, romance-y covers also turn me off. I like a bit of a love story, but romance specifically does nothing for me when it's the central plot. It needs complex explorations of human psychology and lots of rich secondary characters if it's a romance~!

My pet peeve which I only discovered reading Neil Stephenson. Is when a writer uses confusing and big words wher..."
That absolutely does NOT make you a dummy! I'm the same way. It's almost like the author is showing off or something, haha.


Aisha, what are some examples of bad and good POV switching that you've found in your reading? Usually writing POV switches is really hard, so I'd love to know what books you thought did it right.

I'm also not a fan of chessy covers. Again, if you want to make an impression the first impression, which is the cover, should be wow not whose little kid came up with this?
Covers again...the same model/pic on numerous books. UGH!
Use of the same word over and over to describe something. Ok, we got the idea, next word please.
Back to covers...when the characters on the cover do not resemble the characters in the book. Sooo not ok.
Oh my, must stop ranting!



Typos are never fun to read.
I'm still debating how I feel when I'm reading a book and everything is all happy-go-lucky and then we're suddenly hit with angst. I think it can be done well, but at times it can be weird.

And while I might overlook a book with a bad cover...a good cover will definately lure me.

My name isn't the common with it's spelling (bryanna) so I normally don't run into this problem but when I do it I just can't imagine the character because it always seems so opposite of myself and every Brianna/Bryanna I've meet. (yes it's 2 different names. Brianna is
pronounced Bree-Anna and Bryanna is either Bree-On-Ah or Bry(like buy with an r)-Anna)
And I don't like illustrated covers or "cheap covers".
Basically if it looks like a cheap 5 dollar romance from the supermarket. I will most likely avoid it.
Oh and if the title is impossible to read on an ebook cover.

Once I'm reading I hate a lot of typos, similar names, gratuitous sex/violence/rape, strange spellings for names, and cliffhanger endings in the middle of sentences or thoughts.

Hmm, after looking at the link, I see what you mean! So here's the deal. Your book would be the only book out of the group that I would be inclined to read. However, this is due to two reasons. One, I generally would not be interested at all in a military sci-fi book period, but because of your book's cover, I would expect the inside of the book to be something original and unexpected as well. Two, I love a book that is somewhat on the fringe, different, or underground, and your book's cover would make me question what it's about.
In short, the cover is original and intriguing, and would definitely make me pick it up and read the back out of curiosity. The other book covers are too typical and would steer me away from even reading the blurb. So there you have my humble opinion :)


I like that, I was reading a book and the first two sentences sold me on the whole series of books.
"On one otherwise normal Tuesday evening I had the chance to live the American dream. I was able to throw my incomptenet jackass of a boss from a fourteenth-story window."
So yea first sentences, or even first paragraph can definately sway my decision to keep to a book.
As for me, I don't have any turn offs when it comes to a book. I read anything, sometimes it's unbarable and I have to stop reading a story go to something else then come back, but I try not to ever leave something I started unfinished....yea I'm weird.




If I come across books like that I don't bother trying to pronoun..."
So, basically, if you skip reading Tolstoy, or Dostoevsky, or Murakami, or Melville, or Conrad, or Diaz, or Dante, or Shakespeare, et al, then you're guaranteed to end up reading amazing books? Man, wish I had known that before I went to college! Lol.
Books mentioned in this topic
Daimones (other topics)The Lies of Locke Lamora (other topics)
Daimones (other topics)
The Girl in the Steel Corset (other topics)
The Gunslinger (other topics)
More...
- cartoony/illustrated cover. I know that's awful but I associate a cartoony cover with an amateur (completely irrational) or with someone who likes to draw and wrote a book to have a place to show off their art (completely unfair)
- multiple authors. I know it can work because I'm reading a book right now with 3 co-authors. But, in general, if I see a book that has more than one author (and isn't an anthology), I assume that it's going to be disjointed and the voice won't flow well.
- fabio-esque covers. I love a good romance but if there is a sweaty guy with a piece of silk draped over the profile of a woman on the cover...I'm out. It reminds me of what my grandma used to read. I much prefer the 50 shades/twilight/bared to you covers that are just a 'thing' or two without making me feel cheesy.
- a short story with a deep plot. I love short stories for a quick read when I'm in a waiting room or going to sleep. But if I read a book description that talks about the end of the world and a virus that wipes out 90% of the population and 3 people that are set out to rebuild the planet...and the book is 65 pages...I'm not gonna bother. Why waste an interesting story by rushing it?
- typos. Of course I don't know this until I start but if I find typos in the first few pages, I'll usually stop reading and move on. No time to waste on books that the author didn't take time to edit.
I know there are more.... (sadly)
;-)