The History Book Club discussion

This topic is about
Thomas Jefferson
PRESIDENTIAL SERIES
>
2. THOMAS JEFFERSON: THE ART OF POWER - CHAPTERS 4 - 6 (37 - 75) ~ November 26th - December 2nd - No Spoilers, Please
date
newest »

message 51:
by
Bryan
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Dec 01, 2012 05:51AM

reply
|
flag

I find it fascinating that slavery was an issue during this time period, especially to Jefferson since he was a slave owner. I wonder what sparked his interest in this area?

Regarding Jefferson's age as well: he was a burgess in his mid-twenties, one of the intellectual leaders of the colonies and elected to the continental congress at 31, and authored the Declaration of Independence at 33. It's remarkable to think of how much history has been made by the young.

I also thought technology (lack of speedy communications) played in role in all this. You wonder earlier on if both sides sat down over the phone or even telegram, how things would have changed. Commanders and royal governors were pretty independent.
Regarding slavery, I image once he started reading books about rights, TJ's interest in slavery as institution was sparked. We don't know what his father thought about slavery. He didn't have anything in the will about freeing his slaves.

So true, Travis, it must have been a scary but exciting time to be young.

1) Paying the costs of the 7 years war (Americans call it the French and Indian war), which was effectively a world war, with fighting in Europe, India, Africa, and the Americas. Anyhoo, the English were a major player, and borrowed lots of money to fight.
2) maintain English armies in America. It costs money to raise armies, arm them, train them, and send them overseas to build/maintain forts, interact with Native American tribes and hostile French/Spanish settlements, etc.

The Seven Years War created a lot of taxes. Plus, the British hired Germans to fight their war, which was common back then. All costs more and more money.

Enjoying the book very much and Meacham's writing and story telling style is terrific. I am getting a sense of TJ's intellect, influences from his early life, and his contrasting level of skill as a writer and at interpersonal communication. There is something unsettling about his relationship with women. He has the gift of charm (don't all great politicians have this gift?) but in some instances is completely off (such as with Mrs. Walker), yet his courtship with his wife seems so genuine. Early in the book Meacham mentions there is very little information about TJ's mother. Makes me wonder what their relationship was like.
It's hard to think about what life was like in the early colonial days, how did people think about government and what role it should/should not have in their daily lives. We think government moves slow now - can't imagine what it was like before modern industrial communication conveniences. It must have taken months for word of anything to get around!

For instance, John Adams had a private letter where he was complaining about one of his fellow Congressmen (pre-revolutionary war), John Dickinson, saying Dickinson was 'a piddling genius'. It was intercepted by the British and forwarded to Tory (loyalist) newspapers, which printed the letter. Lots of people were pissed at Adams! I guess technically, in that case, the message arrived, but to too many people!! See McCullough's book on John Adams, Chapter 2 for the John Adams letter interception!



Marc that is a great story. "Piddling genius" - what a great turn of phrase. With things like that happening it makes you wonder what all was lost.

Enjoying the book very much and Meacham's writing and story telling style is terrific. I am get..."
Glad to have you here, Alisa.
I get that same sense that he really met his soul mate in Martha, his wife.
Can you image creating a government and living in a world of true local government?

John Quincy Adams, I believe, lost or nearly lost letters while traveling overseas. It is like you dropped your laptop in the ocean and had no back-up!

I have great difficulty understanding how someone with the perspicacity to make this observation as an older adult . . .
The whole commerce between master and slave is a perpetual exercise of the most boisterous passions, the most unremitting despotism on the one part, and degrading submissions on the other. Our children see this, and learn to imitate it; for man is an imitative animal . . . The parent storms, the child looks on, catches the lineaments of wrath, puts on the same airs in the circle of smaller slaves, gives a loose to his worst of passions, and thus nursed, educated, and daily exercised in tyranny, cannot but be stamped by it with odious peculiarities. p. 9
and this observation by Meacham on p. 47 . . .
The ability to apply what one thought in order to shape how one felt, however, was another, more difficult thing. Thomas Jefferson had this ability: His head and his heart were contiguous regions of his character with open boarders. Plenty of philosophical men live in abstract regions, debating types and shadows. The rarer sort is the reader and thinker who can see the world whole.
and his participation in the Howell v. Netherland case which led to this argument, "everyone comes into the world with a right to his own person and using it at his own will," Jefferson said. "This is what is called personal liberty, and is given him by the author of nature, because it is necessary for his own sustenance ."
. . . is capable of compartmentalizing his feelings to such a degree that slavery becomes almost a non-issue. I'm seriously hoping that by some miracle . . after finishing this book my opinion may be altered . . . but Meacham is going to have to convince me . . . I'm a skeptic.

It's very difficult for me to understand as well. However, TJ's wealth was entirely based on the slavery system. He had expensive tastes and as he got further and further into debt, he had even less financial leeway. I think that he justified keeping and selling slaves because he also believed that they were intellectually inferior to whites and couldn't succeed on their own.
I am reading The Hemingses of Monticello. Both he and his father-in-law had slave mistresses, and many of the offspring worked in the household at Monticello. He did free his own children and some of his wife's half-siblings, but the rest of his slaves were out of luck. Unlike Washington, he did not free his slaves when he died. He couldn't afford to.
In his own way, he did help many of the Hemings slaves who were related to him and his wife. His own children were only 1/8 black, and three of them later passed as white.


When people visit Monticello, usually one of the top three questions visitors always ask relates to TJ's position on slavery and this dichotomy. It really is hard to grasp, but I have seen first-hand how people can compartmentalize things in their lives.
Ann said it well: he needed those slaves for his livelihood. Maybe it is something deeper, too, the southern culture of slavery all around you, everyday since you were born that stopped him from not freeing his own slaves. The other thing Meacham argues is that TJ did not push hard when he felt national sentiment wasn't there. Would he abolish the slave trade, then gradual elimination of slavery all together, yes. Yet, he was not an abolitionist that kept pushing the issue regardless of public opinion. TJ was a national politician with many causes to fight, so he backed down. So what does that look like after 200 years...not so good as we can see by asking these questions. Some people argue it is a great character flaw...he didn't stick to his guns, etc.
But on the other side of the ledger, Lincoln used TJ's words to fight against slavery, and this is something we also need to remember.






Good question. It must at least have been a desired skill given the extent of his holdings.

However, I love Meacham's style, sometimes history can be written in a very dry manner and that is not so with this book.
I have always loved reading about TJ , I always thought he was a very complex man, and I can't imagine the bravery and courage that it took to be one of the ones establishing our government and in essence the foundation of our country.
I am loving this book especially because it is written in a way that makes me see TJ in a totally different way, and as a brilliant yet vulnerable human being.
The issue of slavery with him is complex and I'm not sure anyone will ever figure it out as far as he's concerned. He was such a visionary in so many ways, and yet he had some issues he seemed to tolerate and be a little blind about. But then I think we all do in our lives.
I'm not sure if the thing with women goes with the presidency (;-) or with the issue that some men have when they become the most powerful person in the world. I have actually known many men and women both who have had great moral compasses and have fallen when they reached a position of power.
Anyway, I will keep reading and catch up, and I am so excited to be part of this group!


Was ..."
I was frankly shocked by this. Everything I had heard about Jefferson led me to believe he would have more closely guarded his feelings and reputation. This is a glimpse into the man as fully human, valuing this relationship above his political career. My question would be whether he felt the risk to his reputation and proceeded anyway, or whether he proceeded blindly.

But then I think, we don't have oral histories, can't talk to people who knew TJ. What we learn from him are mostly documents. It colors our perspective.

Come to think of it, not much has changed in regards to sex and politics since TJ's day. Politicians still take the chance on ruining their careers on affairs.

He seemed eventually to find his soulmate in Patty. I often wondered about her deathbed request that he not remarry; didnt' know that it likely was based on her desire to shield her children from any future unhappiness with stepmothers.


I think that deathbed promise was a bit strange. Of course, if Jefferson did remarry and have more children, at best that would mean less for her children to inherit. At worst, it could mean a bad stepmother and a favored position for the new children. On the other hand, due to death in child birth, there were many stepmothers in that society. Surely, many - if not most - of them must have been good.
I suspect she was more worried about being replaced in Jefferson's affections.


The Hemingses of Monticello byAnnette Gordon-Reed says that the Hemings family, some of whom were present at Martha's deathbed, told this story. I don't know if the white family did as well.
It is well-established that Jefferson went into a very deep depression after his wife's death. Joseph Ellis in American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson speculates that Jefferson did not want to open himself to such pain again by remarrying: "He would never expose his soul to such pain again; he would rather be lonely than vulnerable." (p.79)
Of course, there was always Sally Hemings, too. We can never know the exact emotional content of that relationship, but it lasted for such a long time that it must have been important.
Alisa, I agree that Jefferson's relationships with women seem strange by our standards.




Books mentioned in this topic
American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson (other topics)The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family (other topics)
The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family (other topics)
John Adams (other topics)
The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Annette Gordon-Reed (other topics)Joseph J. Ellis (other topics)
Annette Gordon-Reed (other topics)
David McCullough (other topics)
Bernard Bailyn (other topics)
More...