twilight lovers! discussion

236 views
Eclipse Movie > Eclipse Movie Release Date: June 30, 2010

Comments Showing 1-50 of 63 (63 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1

message 1: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:58AM) (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod

FEBRUARY 20, 2009

Nikki Finke is exclusively reporting the release date for the Eclipse movie–and it’s only a matter of months after New Moon!:

EXCLUSIVE: I’ve confirmed there’s no director hired yet. And the two productions won’t be back-to-back. But that hasn’t stopped Summit Entertainment from newly scheduling its Twilight threequel for release on June 30, 2010, not long after its Twilight sequel New Moon set for November 20th this year now being helmed by Chris Weitz. Summit also officially changed the name of its vampire movie franchise based on Stephenie Meyer’s bestselling series of novels to The Twilight Saga. Here’s how Summit descibes the plot of the threequel Eclipse:

“As Seattle is ravaged by a string of mysterious killings and a malicious vampire continues her quest for revenge, Bella once again finds herself surrounded by danger. In the midst of it all, she is forced to choose between her love for Edward and her friendship with Jacob — knowing that her decision has the potential to ignite the ageless struggle between vampire and werewolf. With her graduation quickly approaching, Bella has one more decision to make: life or death.”


message 2: by [deleted user] (new)

Dude, that soon???


message 3: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
Thats what I thought...




message 4: by Lexi (new)

Lexi (theonecalledwhatsername) *sigh*
i better b good if its coming out that fast. probably wont b


♥{Miranda!®}♥  (bella) I agree with you there Caronline Pattinson. There's no way that it'll look good. The Twilight movie wasn't all that, and it took a long time, i think. that's like what, 7 or 8 months to make it, that's retarded!


message 6: by Erica (new)

Erica (thppjfan) OMG I think thats awesome that its that short of time. I mean hello! Less time to wait! I nearly went insain knowing i would have to wait another year to see new moon!


message 7: by Adrian (new)

Adrian | 6 comments Hp is soo much betr
as in the movies
twilight movie sukd!!
it was a waste
i meen wut was up wid robrt??!


message 8: by Swati (new)

Swati  (readerforevergmailcom) | 27 comments yea i agree with you TOTALLY caroline..


message 9: by Melissa (new)

Melissa (mkloempken) The only way it will work to have the release date that soon after New Moon would be to do some back-to-back filming and maybe even shoot some scenes from Eclipse with actors not needed on the New Moon set. Example: When they are shooting most of the scenes with Bella and Jacob, they should probably be shooting scenes with the Cullens for Eclipse.

Oh, I hope that made sense! :)


message 10: by Jennifer (new)

Jennifer Hmmm, wouldn't that cost even more money, though? I like your idea, though, Melissa. I think besides the money, the reason they want to get the movies out so fast is because the Cullens don't age. I heard Rob talking about it on a talk show. They have to make it look realistic enough where the Cullens look exactly the same throughout the entire series. But, I mean, it's not like they didn't look like humans in the first movie. I rather wait a year and have a good movie than watch t sooner and have be a waste.


message 11: by Melissa (new)

Melissa (mkloempken) I agree Jennifer, about waiting a year. I don't think people can change that dramatically in one year unless they are forced to.


message 12: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth | 5 comments there is no way this movie will have as good as quality as it could be. I mean it takes a good six to nine months... or more to make a FANTASTIC film. If this movie sucks i am going to write a very strongly worded e mail to Summit


message 13: by Erica (new)

Erica (thppjfan) BTW ppl its like they finish the movie a week before it is premeared so it doesnt have to be back to back right away. Producers normally finish a movie 2-3 months before its shown to add all the little details and edit and stuff, so they could wait a month after new moon is done before shooting and that still be like 8-9 months!


message 14: by Gjela (last edited Feb 23, 2009 07:09PM) (new)

Gjela (theeternalsea) | 60 comments http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4kq4bW1LWSc...

sorry about that...just something retarded i made for my blog in my free time...

fifiteamswitz.blogspot.com

- please vote on my favorite twilight character poll!! i have every character in the books so you can vote for whoever strange person you want to (=


but really...they have to stop making these movies so fast...I mean its fun to watch rpattz act horrible and screw up but part of me wants these movies to actually be good.



message 15: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
I just don't want them to be ruined...if they can pull it off great but if not I would rather them take their time.


message 16: by Melissa (new)

Melissa (mkloempken) I agree Stephanie...a movie shouldn't come out that quickly unless they know they have top-notch stuff on film.


message 17: by Sydney (new)

Sydney (twilighter4life) | 14 comments I think that is way to soon I was thinking maybe at the end of year of 2010 I mean Eclipse was my favorite book and so excited when I heard it would be a movie too and now it just might suck and summit shouldn't rush us twilighters we can try to be patient and wait for the best it can be to capture the book


message 18: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
Its my fave. to...I do not want them to ruin it. I mean yes its exciting that we wont have a long to wait but...if it sucks then its not worth it!!!


message 19: by Lexi (new)

Lexi (theonecalledwhatsername) same here!
but at the same time im kinda scared cuz i REALLY dont want them to mess it up


message 20: by Mellady77 (new)

Mellady77 Stibich | 1149 comments Well, They only had about the same time frame for New Moon and look how well the trailer turned out...


message 21: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
Yeah I think thats the plan....I know that David Slade who is supposed to be directing has already been up in Vancouver with the cast.


message 22: by [deleted user] (new)

Kristen's film adventureland, took longer to film than twilight. *yikes* I wish they would just take their time. I dont mind waiting, if it means the film can do the book some form of justice.


message 23: by [deleted user] (new)

Stephanie wrote: "
FEBRUARY 20, 2009

Nikki Finke is exclusively reporting the release date for the Eclipse movie–and it’s only a matter of months after New Moon!:

EXCLUSIVE: I’ve confirmed there’s no director..."


It comes out on my 13th birthday!!!!!


message 24: by I ♥ Luke Castellan *Alexa*, and Twilight! (new)

I ♥ Luke Castellan *Alexa* (i_love_jacob_black_95) | 3164 comments Oh cool!! Well... happy early b-day!


message 25: by Elena (new)

Elena Hubner | 64 comments wait, eclipse is coming out june, 2010


message 26: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
Yep thats what I have been told...


message 27: by Elena (new)

Elena Hubner | 64 comments yay! but i am still waiting for new moon here! i can't believe they actually put vannessa hudgins in it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


message 28: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
They didn't...


message 29: by [deleted user] (new)

I'm glad they didn't


message 30: by Stephanie, Loves Vamps and Werewolves but Zombies scare me!! (new)

Stephanie | 4175 comments Mod
It was just a rumor..that she was going to play Leah but they are actually holding open casting calls for the part...and in order for you to audition you have to be Native American.


message 31: by [deleted user] (new)

EWW! I hate to imagine her as Leah
and well there are not many native americans..so yea


message 32: by [deleted user] (last edited Jun 26, 2009 07:47PM) (new)

OMG!MOVE CLOCK I WANA SEE DA MOVIEZ!!!!!!=(


message 33: by Katie (new)

Katie Thanks for the date Stephanie! It's close to my birthday!!! :D


message 34: by kayla (new)

kayla  (cupcakeam0ur) | 125 comments ppl ere saying that they've already started filming it so that the characters dont look aged.


message 35: by [deleted user] (new)

Yeah, but the movie won't be released until then.


message 36: by kayla (new)

kayla  (cupcakeam0ur) | 125 comments oh i know but thats what ive herd, i think they'll start breaking dawn early too!


message 37: by [deleted user] (new)

Yeah, it's going super fast.


message 38: by kayla (new)

kayla  (cupcakeam0ur) | 125 comments i just hope they premeir it fast too!lol


message 39: by Mellady77 (new)

Mellady77 Stibich | 1149 comments I hope they slow production down...I don't want my favorite book looking crappy onscreen.


message 40: by [deleted user] (new)

I hear read ya.


message 41: by [deleted user] (new)

teehee


message 42: by kayla (new)

kayla  (cupcakeam0ur) | 125 comments ya that does make sense, so it looks, good, agreed, good point!lol


message 43: by Roksana (new)

Roksana | 118 comments I dont know...wasnt New Moon star filming in Mar 09? so that was 9 months prior to release. Eclipse started filming Aug 09 and coming out Jun 10...thats 10.5 months. I thinks it planty. What worries me that there is no talk of BD....When can we expect that???


message 44: by [deleted user] (new)

Well, they usually take two months break in between filming, so maybe two months?


message 45: by kayla (new)

kayla  (cupcakeam0ur) | 125 comments idk, i think the paparazzi will try to find out as soon as possible!


message 46: by Roksana (new)

Roksana | 118 comments I want to find out as soon as possible....lol
I think this one is going to take a while longer simply because the need to work out the logistics of how they are going to do it all the special affects etc....Its ok...I can be patient as loong as they make the damn movie!!

Also I dont want them to make this damn movie PG...Come on how the hell are you going to not show the "love scene" and the "C Section with teeth"?
lol


message 47: by [deleted user] (new)

Lol. I don't like how some sites used the term "heavily censored", because that makes me think that they're just not going to do it at all. What they can do though, is film Edward frantic and grabbing things while running around the table trying to help her, but never filming lower than the middle of his torso, so the audience doesn't see what his hands are doing when trying to help Bella survive. They can also pan to Bella's dying face a few times.

Also, for the love scene they could just film Edward in the ocean, only his torso visible in the black water. And then Bella's face as she undresses, but not her body. Then they cut to him, waiting for her, while she somehow gets in the water and only keeps her head above the surface, then Edward's face, and then hers suddenly level with his as they kiss and it fades to black, having only shown their shoulders. Then the next morning they are either dressed or wrapped in a sheet. That's how I think it should go. What do you think?


message 48: by kayla (last edited Oct 30, 2009 03:10PM) (new)

kayla  (cupcakeam0ur) | 125 comments i like that idea, i was kinda wondering myself how they were going to keep it G, in those parts, and i was wondering how they were going to show the bruises on bellas body, if she's coverd, idk, im sure they'll find something, if they dont, ALOT of boys r going to that movie, im pretty sure of it!*creepy*


message 49: by Roksana (new)

Roksana | 118 comments Melzz wrote: "Lol. I don't like how some sites used the term "heavily censored", because that makes me think that they're just not going to do it at all. What they can do though, is film Edward frantic and grabb..."

:( where is the fun in that?

but I agree thats how I wld do it if I had to make it PG.


message 50: by [deleted user] (new)

Ya that's how I would do it

Even if it's PG 13 they can show some ass


« previous 1
back to top