Kane & Abel question

Is it possible to choose? Wladek was very determined, and made his entire life all by himself. But he was acting on incomplete knowledge when he held Kane responsible for Leroy's death and when he thought Maxton was his benefactor. Kane was a rich lifetyle living guy but I don't hink that matters after a certain level when you have to do things on your own. He also made some good choices- backing Wladek, getting the truth about Osborne, etc. Both were complete in their way, and both had their flaws. I would love to be the third person instead of choosing amongst them.

William.

Not only did he have a better childhood but he didn't let himself be consumed by revenge.

William Kane! :)

William Kane

Abel Rosnovski
Because unlike William he was a self made millionaire. Being a penniless immigrant who made his fortune with sheer hard work, one kind of has sentiments attached with his rise and success.
Kane on the other hand was born in a rich family and only had to take the legacy forward.

Rosnovski without a doubt!

William. He's a bit less of a bastard.

William Kane. He had all the privelege in the world and lived a rather cushy existance. He didn't really have to fight for anything and pretty had a silver spoon gauranteed for most of his life. I'd rather be him, although I did enjoy Abel much better in the story. He had a much better drive and sheer determination.

Abel ! he's actually had hardships in his life , unlike Kane !!

I think William.

Frankly, I don't remember enough about the book to say. It was an enjoyable read but not memorable.