Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Serieses!
>
Does this need a more specific title?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Krystal109
(new)
Sep 08, 2012 04:28PM

reply
|
flag
message 2:
by
yojharobed || I have no sword. I don't need a sword. Because I am the Doctor and this is my spoon. En garde!
(new)

I don't think it is an official series, so I don't see why the title shouldn't be more specific for searches.

See this thread: http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1...
I don't see any compelling reason not to give the books a more descriptive title. It can't hurt and might help.


I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Series are a very convenient way to organize information, and it's generally information of value to readers. For the purposes of organizing that info, one book with one sequel is as valid a "series" as any other number of books.

Or where a publishing imprint, often academic, publishes works that adhere to a common theme. E.g. Studies in the Legal History of the South, published by the University of Georgia Press. In each book in the series you'll see the series title mentioned, followed by all the books in that series published up to the current time.
I don't think of it as a series when someone writes a memoir, and then another memoir.

If you guys decide to delete the series that would be up to you based on GR's policy. I would really appreciate a super or rivka to chime in on this.


Krystal109 wrote: "I just thought a series title better than "Autobiography" should have been applied."
Not sure why it's necessary. Anyone searching by author name will find it via general search.
Not sure why it's necessary. Anyone searching by author name will find it via general search.