Horror Aficionados discussion
The Tomb of Archived Threads
>
Is There a Point to Writing Horror?
message 51:
by
Jon Recluse
(new)
Sep 09, 2012 06:51PM

reply
|
flag


Wonder how many Twilight fans are Democrats?

I don't temper it for a young adult audience, no matter how popular The Hunger Games may be. If it keeps me poor, so be it. My idea of a love story is Norman Bates' relationship with his dead mother, so you won't see me writing one of those.

Ardy wrote: "Democrats see evil as potential voters? That explains so much. I think horror might sell better to Repulicans because they take the time to think things out, and despite a lot of popular opinion, t..."
It was a joke.
Stop it now.
It was a joke.
Stop it now.
Bandit wrote: "I really don't think there is any reason to get insulting, Ardy, especially since I don't see any democrats doing any republican (yes, that's how it's spelled for all those extra IQ points) bashing..."
Sorry, Bandit.
I was just kidding around.
Sorry, Bandit.
I was just kidding around.


here, I wish I could outfit the world in these
http://www.peaceloveandt-shirts.com/P...
Thanks, Bandit.
Not my style, though.
Do they have a "Give Peace a chance or we'll beat you" t-shirt?
Not my style, though.
Do they have a "Give Peace a chance or we'll beat you" t-shirt?

News to me. I'll be sure to check it out. Love The Walking Dead!

Walking Dead is awesome
Bandit wrote: ":)
this is all they have in Bandit wear at this time
http://shop.cafepress.co.uk/outlaw-mo..."
I'll take it!
this is all they have in Bandit wear at this time
http://shop.cafepress.co.uk/outlaw-mo..."
I'll take it!

I enjoy horror on the psycho level. Poe is one of my favorite, and granted he had a lot of gore, but his stuff also opperated on a more subtle. These days we are a bit desensitized to swinging pendulums and pre mature burial is not a daily occurrance.
I can't speak for writers who only write in the horror genre, since I am to ADD to do that, but I write horror because it allows me to explore my own fears. Most of us have to deal with some level of 'fear of rejection' which is why I think Carrie is very popular. Fear and the way we handle it make us uniquely human. Fear in an animal illicites flight (unless cornered), however humans have a choice in how they deal with fear. They can run, in which case the fear does not go away, or they can face it, in which they will conqure or be consumed.
Horror (and its basic emotion, fear) brings us face to face with the live or die choice. The choice to go out with this guy or date that girl may be portrayed as 'life or death', but we know it isn't.
Getting walled up down in a wine cellar or losing your grip on reality is a bit more viseral.

I agree. I think I write horror stories because it's fun to scare people. When I was a kid, me and my friends loved to tell scary stories (like urban legends) to each other althought we knew that the stories were most likely not true. Even kids nowadays still look for ghost stories. They love to be scared.

this is all they have in Bandit wear at this time
http://shop.cafepress.co.uk/outlaw-mo..."
Dig the clothes, Bandit...

doesn't it beat a maytag uniform, though"
Heh...

Not my style, though.
Do they have a "Give Peace a chance or we'll beat you" t-shirt?"
I'd buy that...

I think there are various reasons why some of us write and read horror. They include a longstanding attraction to the genre. Writing and reading horror can be a safe thrill-ride. It can be cathartic. It can be a great way to interrogate our core spiritual beliefs. I've always felt that the best horror is a wishful way to assert that there is something beyond the natural world and our mortal lives. Even today, as the genre continues to evolve, a good portion of horror has the protagonist getting the best of whatever mortal or supernatural evil he's facing.
At its core, horror plays out the ages old Good vs. Evil equation again and again. Many of us never outgrow our early interest in that battle. When the horror is defeated in a story, physical and spiritual pain are minimized. Maybe even death is conquered. Horror writers tap into that desire in each of us to see evil, negativity and death defeated. This applies even to stories that problematize the very nature of life, death and evil because ultimately we find that there are gradations of cruelty, immortality, cruelty, etc.
Jekyllhyde

Jason -- I wish I could say, "Whatever I tell him," but it's often more the other way around. ;)



Horror movies are always coming out as well, so maybe there's a bit of a cross-section to books.

The more self aware horror writers do this consciously, which often makes their stories more powerful, but I think that all horror stories ultimately do this to one degree or another. And the idea/theme may or may not be embodied in the threat itself. Some authors choose to make the threat/monster/antagonist the symbol for the idea of the story, while others may simply use it as a situation facing the characters who embody the idea instead. A calculating author may even use both. He can use different elements of the story to layer the ideas, and add depth to the piece. Sometimes he might even come out and say what some element of the book is about, while leaving deeper elements of the work unsaid. This in no way detracts from the “horror” of the story, and often enhances it. Even if the reader finishes the book without being able to state what the theme was, the fact it was there will have made the book a deeper and more satisfying experience for him.

With this in mind, I don't think that horror, as a genre, should have to justify itself more than any other form of writing. Sadly, this seems to be the case regardless in today's market. I have a very well read, very intelligent friend who dismisses horror out of hand, on the grounds that it's less valid than other genres. His exact words were, "I don't agree with any genre that sets out to provoke one reaction in the reader". As though a horror story were just a ride on a fairground ghost train or something.

Although the predominant emotion invoked by horror is certainly fear, I don't think I have ever read a horror novel that didn't have more to it than that (or at least finished one). Horror novels still have complete characters who feel/experience a wide range of emotions, obstacles, etc.
I honestly don't see how the genre as a whole can be downplayed as something less reputable. There is quality and crap in all genres. It's a certain type of snobbery to say a whole genre sucks because one simply doesn't enjoy it. I'm not a fan of romance, but that doesn't make every romance novel crap.

I tend toward horror because I have a generally dark perspective and am prone to fright.
Some people horror comes out of and others read it, usually with a great deal of overlap.
It's like asking why someone plays metal instead of pop.

I think quite a bit of this snobbery takes as its premise that genre literature is aimed at the lowest common denominator, its primary focus (horror, romance, etc.), and for this reason it lacks literary complexity. A notion I find to be both simplistic and lazy on its face. I equate fiction to poetry, in that the primary goal of both should be to make the reader feel something.

Some stuff you read because it's deep and engrossing, other stuff because it's silly, entertining, and distracting.
You don't become an idiot because you like something dumb every now and then.
And while there is witing I hate and will use every hyperbolic power I have to attack, I realize that someone out there likes it, and that person isn't necessarily a bigger idiot than me.
Now... non-fiction. That's another story.
A lot of that is total tripe. ;)

1.The Downright Horrendous( Horror so scary, gory, violent and intense that there it's elements leaving people scared or with memories they cannot endure or they are possibly even dead)
2.The Strange and Bizarre( A scare factor without any reasoning or is just so weird that it's creepy and odd. Horror so scary that the reason it is is because of everything it is not)
3.Gore(While gore factors in the first, it stands alone as it's own type of horror. The blood, violence and everything that makes it so is enough to scare off the boots and gross anyone out)
4.Eerie and Creepy( Spine chilling, looking behind your back, the prickly things on the back of your neck..yup thats this)
5.Suspense/Mystery( A type of scare that leaves you at the edge of your seat but is also possibly solvable unless of course one is too scared)

I here ya about the parents thing. Knowing that my parents have read some of the sick stuff I've written or worse, my girlfriend's parents, makes my face turn a little redder at family gatherings

Oh man, my dad telling me that what I wrote was a little creepy was probably my lowest/highest point so far. Totally agree.

http://darnellsakidickerson.blogs..."
Interesting read. I would suggest that fear is one of the primal most feelings we can experience. It taps into something deep within our hearts, and gets us excited about the story. Also, it's a little like roller coasters and other things that evoke fear but don't offer any real risk. Simply put, they're fun. And when telling a story, if you're not having fun, not being entertained, what's the point?

David, I like McCarthy but some don't because of his writing style. But The Road is a very dark and depressing novel, but check it out. Personally, I liked it but liked No Country for Old Men better...but The Road is a powerful novel...

I like what Jecklhyde said about the good versus evil plot playing out in horror.
At first, I hesitated to call my book horror because the genre is dominated at present with zombies and vampires, whereas my book is more classic horror. Also, it necessarily crosses genres as I suspect most hooror novels do - suspense, thriller mystery. My brother chastized me saying, "Of course it's horror, Carla. Your main character is one down from the devil, you can't get any more horror than that."
So I gave in and called it Horror, but there are a number of people who have told me they don't read horror, and when I question them, it's either that they don't like the vampire zombie thing or they fear it is all gore and violence. My book is not without gore, but it is NERVER gratuitous or overdone and always serves a purpose in defining characters, their danger, or plot.
I think the basic struggle of good over evil - no matter how it is defined or played out in fiction - will always be in demand. It touches our very core and echoes our inner battle with evil. Everytime good triumphs in life or fiction, it gives us hope. The Glen


1.The Downright Horrendous( Horror so scary, gory, violent and intense that there it's elements leaving people scared or wi..."
Justin that's awesome! :-)

That makes my heart sink a little. I'm sure he could have a compelling argument but every type of fiction aims to bring out some kind of reaction in the reader. There's the so called genre stories that provoke emotions like how romance makes us swoon of feel sorrow over love lost. Sci-fi/fantasy makes us feel wonderment.. etc
Even literary fiction provokes us, it sets out to make us think and feel and question.
I think if a piece of fiction doesn't provoke any reaction in the reader it's doing something wrong.

Brilliant Justin.
Now, (just for the sake of gumming up the works), where does thriller fit in?

Totally agree JD"
Amen.I can't stand how the "literary" types expect us to justify why we write what we write. We should be asking them "why are you writing existential hoopla filled with subtext?"

I think the general public sees ALL entertainment is lowbrow. That's why we had Jersey Shore and Adam Sandler.
As I've mentioned before, I think writers of dark fiction may have a self-esteem issue. Why should we have to justify why we write at all? It can be intense horror like Macbeth or pure fluff like Midnight Summer's Dream. Thankfully there are more things in heaven and earth than Snooki.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Glen (other topics)Apparition (other topics)