The Kite Runner
discussion
The Haunting Scene between Hassan and Assef in the Alley
date
newest »


I agree with you Aakansha. Years ago my book club (at the time) had a heated discussion about this scene. Some people were horrified and seemed to detest Amir's character for turning his back on Hassan in the alley. But he was just a little boy. How many children would be able to stop willingly step forward during an attack like that? And surely be attacked too? For me, his character was flawed and human. But I had empathy for him. And Hassan was truly beautiful and a rare kind of person.

I think that too"
I don't agree. He was afraid for himself, and tortured by guilt afterwards, so much that he could no longer be a friend. A psychopath has no conscience.







who stand witness to all atrocities without reacting..that's what I realised from reading this book..and I feel ashamed and a lot helpless about that...


I agree that fear would be understandable - but the narrator (Amir) makes it clear that FEAR WAS NOT THE REASON. (After all, if he did not dare fight, he could have shouted for help, or run to fetch an adult.) The motive was pure selfishness.
The other boys 'punish' Hassan in that way because he refuses to hand over the kite. Amir does nothing to intervene BECAUSE HE WANTS THE KITE. Having the kite (and consequently his father's approval) is more important to him than saving his friend. Hassan's personal integrity and dignity do not really matter to him, because Hassan is "only a Hazzara".
Cowardice might be excusable. The fact that he is willing to allow another child to suffer in that way, simply in order to win his father's praise, is not.

And then the drops of blood on the ground....*shudder*

Worst of all, there is Amir's persecution of Hassan, as he projects his own guilt onto his friend. Amir's behaviour is abominable, and his wallowing on self-pity over it later, as an adult, does not make it any more excusable.

Have you read Hosseini's A Thousand Splendid Suns? It is not at par with The Kite Runner, but some portions do make your blood run cold.

It is obvious that he identifies with Amir, to some extent; he certainly expects us to sympathise with the narrator, and his petulance that the child, Sohrab, whom he has repeatedly betrayed, does not forgive him.
Also, as a writer, he seems to be dismissing Hassan, as just "Amir's Hazzara servant". He doesn't bother to make the character consistant. Sometimes Hassan is much wiser than his years, and nobly forgives Amir because he sees why he does something, at other times, at others he is the "simple peasant" with noble, foolish loyalty to his master's son. He is written simply as a foil to the character of Amir - his nobility counterpoints Amir's weakness of character. His own character is inconsistent - sometimes farsighted, sometimesstupidly naive - whatever is needed to show up Amir. The author shows no interest in Hassan as a character in his own right - the individual scenes are well-written, but together they seem inconsistent.
I don't like a writer cynically playing with my emotions. A scene that is completely implausible, added just to make a point, annoys me.
**SPOILER**
Do you remember when the father of one of the boys who abused Hassan tells 'Baba' how his son has been raped by by paramilitaries. Very poetic justice, of course. But the scene is completely implausible. The book has emphasised how Hassan cannot reveal what has happened to him because it woyld shame his father and Amir's. Do you really think an Afghan man would chat to another Afghan man about his son's shame? I don't. That it happened is plausible, the conversation is not. It's inclusion is clumsy audience manipulation - I did not like it.
**-**
How does "A Thousand Splendid Suns" compare, in your opinion?

As for how Hassan is portrayed, I did not find them in the manner you described. May be I wasn't as attentive back then. But yeah, I did feel that Hassan's presence could have been longer. But then, considering that the book is written in Amir's narrative, this might have been a conscious decision. Because despite the discrepancies in the character, Hassan still overpowered Amir.
As for the later point, ideally a man wouldn't talk to another regarding that act. But if the intention of the man is to shame him, there is a possibility. May be it was a hint to the possession of knowledge that Hassan was Amir's brother?
About a thousand splendid suns, the reason I did not enjoy it as much is because of the wretchedness of one of the two women in the book. Since you haven't read the book, I won't give out any spoilers, but as you go on reading, the realization that there lies no happiness in store for her makes you feel utterly helpless. And to know that this is what large number of women have to go through...

I was so angry at Amir for not doing anything.
Hassan was my favorite character.





all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
I agree. The word they gave for him in the book was "sociopath" Pg. 38