Structural Analysis Books

Showing 1-9 of 9
Structural Analysis Structural Analysis (Hardcover)
by (shelved 2 times as structural-analysis)
avg rating 4.10 — 423 ratings — published 1982
Rate this book
Clear rating
Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father's Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father's Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success (Hardcover)
by (shelved 1 time as structural-analysis)
avg rating 4.41 — 1,941 ratings — published 2024
Rate this book
Clear rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
Engineering Mechanics: Statics & Dynamics Engineering Mechanics: Statics & Dynamics (Paperback)
by (shelved 1 time as structural-analysis)
avg rating 4.06 — 206 ratings — published 1992
Rate this book
Clear rating
Engineering Mechanics: Statics Engineering Mechanics: Statics (Hardcover)
by (shelved 1 time as structural-analysis)
avg rating 3.91 — 485 ratings — published 1974
Rate this book
Clear rating
Theory Of Structures Theory Of Structures (Paperback)
by (shelved 1 time as structural-analysis)
avg rating 3.86 — 295 ratings — published
Rate this book
Clear rating
Structural Analysis Structural Analysis (Paperback)
by (shelved 1 time as structural-analysis)
avg rating 4.28 — 79 ratings — published 2011
Rate this book
Clear rating
Indeterminate Structural Analysis Indeterminate Structural Analysis (Paperback)
by (shelved 1 time as structural-analysis)
avg rating 4.60 — 5 ratings — published
Rate this book
Clear rating
Structural Analysis: A Unified Classical and Matrix Approach Structural Analysis: A Unified Classical and Matrix Approach (Paperback)
by (shelved 1 time as structural-analysis)
avg rating 4.12 — 8 ratings — published 1972
Rate this book
Clear rating


David Graeber
“The basic principle of structural analysis, I was explaining, is that the terms of a symbolic system do not stand in isolation—they are not to be thought of in terms of what they 'stand for,' but are defined by their relations to each other. One has to first define the field, and then look for elements in that field that are systematic inversions of each other. Take vampires. First you place them: vampires are stock figures in American horror movies. American horror movies constitute a kind of cosmology, a universe unto themselves. Then you ask: what, within this cosmos, is the opposite of a vampire? The answer is obvious. The opposite of a vampire is a werewolf. On one level they are the same: they are both monsters that can bite you and, biting you, turn you, too, into one of their own kind. In most other ways each is an exact inversion of the other. Vampires are rich. They are typically aristocrats. Werewolves are always poor. Vampires are fixed in space: they have castles or crypts that they have to retreat to during the daytime; werewolves are usually homeless derelicts, travelers, or otherwise on the run. Vampires control other creatures (bats, wolves, humans that they hypnotize or render thralls). Werewolves can't control themselves. Yet—and this is really the clincher in this case—each can be destroyed only by its own negation: vampires, by a stake, a simple sharpened stick that peasants use to construct fences; werewolves, by a silver bullet, something literally made from money.”
David Graeber, The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy