9 books
—
1 voter
Roman History Books
Showing 1-50 of 2,848

by (shelved 215 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.06 — 78,577 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 170 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.23 — 26,132 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 117 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.02 — 22,367 ratings — published 121

by (shelved 98 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.25 — 15,283 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 93 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.23 — 12,957 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 92 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.16 — 6,723 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 74 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.02 — 15,330 ratings — published 1776

by (shelved 72 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.95 — 8,274 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 71 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.90 — 8,210 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 62 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.28 — 4,853 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 60 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.95 — 3,400 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 60 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.20 — 4,371 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 59 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.01 — 3,137 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 59 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.01 — 13,324 ratings — published -50

by (shelved 57 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.16 — 4,292 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 55 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.95 — 4,612 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 51 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.96 — 9,787 ratings — published -29

by (shelved 48 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.98 — 9,226 ratings — published 116

by (shelved 44 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.24 — 72,210 ratings — published 1934

by (shelved 43 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.95 — 2,238 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 41 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.09 — 6,529 ratings — published 2023

by (shelved 40 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.19 — 3,508 ratings — published 2023

by (shelved 40 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.90 — 1,876 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 40 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.28 — 329,252 ratings — published 180

by (shelved 35 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.08 — 5,819 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 34 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.11 — 2,356 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 33 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.06 — 4,823 ratings — published -170

by (shelved 32 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.17 — 3,426 ratings — published 1776

by (shelved 31 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.15 — 3,758 ratings — published -27

by (shelved 31 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.23 — 1,001 ratings — published 1939

by (shelved 30 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.07 — 7,146 ratings — published -47

by (shelved 29 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.13 — 3,921 ratings — published

by (shelved 29 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.21 — 2,826 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 28 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.16 — 1,887 ratings — published 1926

by (shelved 28 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.87 — 141,050 ratings — published -19

by (shelved 28 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.11 — 4,134 ratings — published 100

by (shelved 28 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.00 — 2,092 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 26 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.10 — 5,209 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 26 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.97 — 6,008 ratings — published 98

by (shelved 25 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.16 — 3,013 ratings — published 2023

by (shelved 25 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.96 — 1,970 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 25 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.09 — 2,757 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 23 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.00 — 265 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 23 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.90 — 2,091 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 23 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.73 — 122,148 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 22 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.05 — 1,170 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 22 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.08 — 1,272 ratings — published 391

by (shelved 21 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.95 — 2,225 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 20 times as roman-history)
avg rating 3.97 — 2,431 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 19 times as roman-history)
avg rating 4.21 — 1,087 ratings — published 2022

“Several bitter contemporary references to the pseudo-Emperor Eugenius had puzzled us. They asked how a man of such an appearance could attempt the pagan re-establishment. They asked it in horror, for there were certain horrifying aspects to this particular pagan reversion. It was not the old disinterested paganism; it was impassioned and very nearly diabolical in some of its manifestations.
The meaning of the references came clear with the examination of reproductions of coins and medallions of the pseudo-Emperor. Eugenius, who affected an old oriental style in hair and beard, had the face of Jesus Christ.”
― The Fall of Rome
The meaning of the references came clear with the examination of reproductions of coins and medallions of the pseudo-Emperor. Eugenius, who affected an old oriental style in hair and beard, had the face of Jesus Christ.”
― The Fall of Rome

“Rufinus was an orator and a lawyer, a master of civil administration and agenda. It was because of him that the Eastern Empire—Byzantium—became a bureaucracy for a thousand years; and lived on because its administration had become too intricate to die—though there are those who say that its death was concealed in a sea of paper for that one thousand years. The heritage of Rufinus was the first and longest-enduring paper Empire.
It is not accidental that in the tenure of Rufinus as Master of Offices, the duplication of written copies was first brought about. This was not on the order of carbon paper used at the instant of writing; it was wet-process copies made from a finished piece. The process is a detail, however; in the true sense Rufinus was the inventor of carbon copies. Shorthand was then five hundred years old, but Rufinus was the inventor of an improved form of shorthand.
It is believed that certain clerks of his appointing are still shuffling papers at the same desks. The paper world he set up was self-perpetuating.”
― The Fall of Rome
It is not accidental that in the tenure of Rufinus as Master of Offices, the duplication of written copies was first brought about. This was not on the order of carbon paper used at the instant of writing; it was wet-process copies made from a finished piece. The process is a detail, however; in the true sense Rufinus was the inventor of carbon copies. Shorthand was then five hundred years old, but Rufinus was the inventor of an improved form of shorthand.
It is believed that certain clerks of his appointing are still shuffling papers at the same desks. The paper world he set up was self-perpetuating.”
― The Fall of Rome