Riemann Books
Showing 1-16 of 16

by (shelved 2 times as riemann)
avg rating 4.12 — 5,241 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 3.49 — 18,545 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 3.89 — 54 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 3.93 — 15 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 4.20 — 127 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 4.05 — 328,960 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 3.67 — 156 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 3.75 — 502 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 3.54 — 13 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 3.00 — 2 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 4.16 — 75 ratings — published 1974

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 4.00 — 5 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 4.70 — 20 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 4.83 — 6 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 4.44 — 9 ratings — published 1981

by (shelved 1 time as riemann)
avg rating 4.15 — 3,746 ratings — published 2003

“No mathematician should ever allow him to forget that mathematics, more than any other art or science, is a young man's game. … Galois died at twenty-one, Abel at twenty-seven, Ramanujan at thirty-three, Riemann at forty. There have been men who have done great work later; … [but] I do not know of a single instance of a major mathematical advance initiated by a man past fifty. … A mathematician may still be competent enough at sixty, but it is useless to expect him to have original ideas.”
― A Mathematician's Apology
― A Mathematician's Apology

“The best that Gauss has given us was likewise an exclusive production. If he had not created his geometry of surfaces, which served Riemann as a basis, it is scarcely conceivable that anyone else would have discovered it. I do not hesitate to confess that to a certain extent a similar pleasure may be found by absorbing ourselves in questions of pure geometry.”
―
―