History Of Philosophy Books
Showing 1-50 of 2,178

by (shelved 43 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.13 — 41,115 ratings — published 1945

by (shelved 39 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.12 — 1,986 ratings — published 1946

by (shelved 34 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.97 — 277,665 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 28 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.15 — 17,811 ratings — published 1926

by (shelved 27 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.19 — 1,128 ratings — published 1950

by (shelved 22 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.13 — 512 ratings — published 1962

by (shelved 22 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.22 — 496 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 22 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.15 — 502 ratings — published 1946

by (shelved 22 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.23 — 359 ratings — published 1960

by (shelved 21 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.22 — 243 ratings — published 1975

by (shelved 21 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.13 — 271 ratings — published 1966

by (shelved 21 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.13 — 366 ratings — published 1959

by (shelved 21 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.25 — 442 ratings — published 1952

by (shelved 16 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.06 — 1,647 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 15 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.94 — 570 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 13 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.82 — 268 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 12 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.31 — 553 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 12 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.08 — 2,006 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 12 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.80 — 277 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 11 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.12 — 15,364 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 11 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.84 — 187 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 10 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.31 — 232 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 10 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.34 — 58 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 10 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.97 — 222,094 ratings — published -400

by (shelved 9 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.16 — 1,572 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 8 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.20 — 185 ratings — published 1969

by (shelved 8 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.96 — 20,181 ratings — published 1807

by (shelved 8 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.83 — 22,295 ratings — published 1785

by (shelved 7 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.35 — 245 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 7 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.22 — 81 ratings — published 1975

by (shelved 7 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.69 — 349 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 7 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.96 — 41,387 ratings — published 1781

by (shelved 7 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.12 — 45,150 ratings — published -400

by (shelved 6 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.07 — 2,529 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 6 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.33 — 673 ratings — published 1948

by (shelved 6 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.24 — 103 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 6 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.24 — 2,052 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 6 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.17 — 1,812 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 6 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.07 — 5,322 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 6 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.28 — 329,252 ratings — published 180

by (shelved 6 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.90 — 18,313 ratings — published 1912

by (shelved 6 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.94 — 22,123 ratings — published 1748

by (shelved 6 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.00 — 58,251 ratings — published -350

by (shelved 6 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.03 — 3,278 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 5 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.37 — 11,983 ratings — published -347

by (shelved 5 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.53 — 133 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 5 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.00 — 68 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 5 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.23 — 895 ratings — published 1957

by (shelved 5 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 4.30 — 330 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 5 times as history-of-philosophy)
avg rating 3.68 — 2,924 ratings — published 2018

“What I have described as a blind spot is not a mere oversight on Sellars's part. I think it reflects Sellars's attempt to combine two insights: first, that meaning and intentionality come into view only in a context that is normatively organized, and, second, that reality as it is contemplated by the sciences of nature is norm-free. The trouble is that Sellars thinks the norm-free reality disclosed by the natural sciences is the only location for genuine relations to actualities. That is what leads to the idea that placing the mind in nature requires abstracting from aboutness.
Now Aquinas, writing before the rise of modern science, is immune to the attractions of that norm-free conception of nature. And we should not be too quick to regard this as wholly a deficiency in his thinking. (Of course in all kinds of ways it is a deficiency.) There is a live possibility that, at least in one respect, Thomistic philosophy of mind is superior to Sellarsian philosophy of mind, just because Aquinas lacks the distinctively modern conception of nature that underlies Sellars's thinking. Sellars allows his philosophy to be shaped by a conception that is characteristic of his own time, and so misses an opportunity to learn something from the past.”
― Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars
Now Aquinas, writing before the rise of modern science, is immune to the attractions of that norm-free conception of nature. And we should not be too quick to regard this as wholly a deficiency in his thinking. (Of course in all kinds of ways it is a deficiency.) There is a live possibility that, at least in one respect, Thomistic philosophy of mind is superior to Sellarsian philosophy of mind, just because Aquinas lacks the distinctively modern conception of nature that underlies Sellars's thinking. Sellars allows his philosophy to be shaped by a conception that is characteristic of his own time, and so misses an opportunity to learn something from the past.”
― Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars

“With subjectivism in philosophy, anarchism in politics goes hand in hand.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bertrand...”
―
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bertrand...”
―