Existential Psychology Books
Showing 1-50 of 102

by (shelved 11 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.37 — 850,165 ratings — published 1946

by (shelved 6 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.46 — 7,111 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 5 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.32 — 28,116 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 5 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.07 — 1,096 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 5 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.23 — 15,587 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 4 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.22 — 4,073 ratings — published 1953

by (shelved 4 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.25 — 737 ratings — published 1977

by (shelved 4 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.28 — 30,316 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 3 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.23 — 3,909 ratings — published 1969

by (shelved 3 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.22 — 294 ratings — published 1981

by (shelved 3 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.05 — 15,512 ratings — published 1973

by (shelved 3 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.13 — 2,705 ratings — published 1969

by (shelved 3 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.06 — 431 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 3 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.07 — 11,769 ratings — published 1923

by (shelved 3 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.11 — 6,368 ratings — published 1960

by (shelved 3 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.07 — 495 ratings — published 1956

by (shelved 3 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.46 — 283 ratings — published 1976

by (shelved 2 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.16 — 18,337 ratings — published 1961

by (shelved 2 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.07 — 4,175 ratings — published 1975

by (shelved 2 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.40 — 9,150 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 2 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.25 — 40,624 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 2 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.22 — 13,831 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 2 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.34 — 975 ratings — published 1962

by (shelved 2 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.07 — 110 ratings — published 1958

by (shelved 2 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.18 — 1,702 ratings — published 1946

by (shelved 2 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.04 — 5,178 ratings — published 1974

by (shelved 2 times as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.00 — 93,161 ratings — published 1956

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.38 — 93 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 3.95 — 169 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.19 — 1,688 ratings — published 1954

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.09 — 11,930 ratings — published 1849

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 5.00 — 1 rating — published

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 5.00 — 1 rating — published

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.40 — 15 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.07 — 21,866 ratings — published 1835

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.27 — 97 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.41 — 74 ratings — published 1978

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.00 — 38 ratings — published 1972

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.22 — 647 ratings — published 1951

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.10 — 2,636 ratings — published 1958

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 3.86 — 7 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 3.89 — 1,614 ratings — published 1970

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 3.54 — 1,919 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 3.64 — 63,652 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.19 — 8,712 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.49 — 9,407 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.32 — 119 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 3.56 — 115 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 3.72 — 25 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as existential-psychology)
avg rating 4.21 — 34 ratings — published 1979

“The dispersion of the daimonic by means of impersonality has serious and destructive effects. In New York City, it is not regarded as strange that the anonymous human beings secluded in single-room occupancies are so often connected with violent crime and drug addiction. Not that the anonymous individual in New York is alone: he sees thousands of other people every day, and he knows all the famous personalities as they come, via TV, into his single room. He knows their names, their smiles, their idiosyncrasies; they bandy about in a “we're-all-friends-together” mood on the screen which invites him to join them and subtly assumes that he does join them. He knows them all. But he himself is never known. His smile is unseen; his idiosyncrasies are important to no-body; his name is unknown. He remains a foreigner pushed on and off the subway by tens of thousands of other anonymous foreigners. There is a deeply depersonalizing tragedy involved in this. The most severe punishment Yahweh could inflict on his people was to blot out their name. “Their names,” Yahweh proclaims, “shall be wiped out of the book of the living.”
This anonymous man's never being known, this aloneness, is transformed into loneliness, which may then become daimonic possession. For his self-doubts—“I don't really exist since I can't affect anyone” —eat away at his innards; he lives and breathes and walks in a loneliness which is subtle and insidious. It is not surprising that he gets a gun and trains it on some passer-by—also anonymous to him. And it is not surprising that the young men in the streets, who are only anonymous digits in their society, should gang together in violent attacks to make sure their assertion is felt.
Loneliness and its stepchild, alienation, can become forms of demon possession. Surrendering ourselves to the impersonal daimonic pushes us into an anonymity which is also impersonal; we serve nature’s gross purposes on the lowest common denominator, which often means with violence.”
― Love and Will
This anonymous man's never being known, this aloneness, is transformed into loneliness, which may then become daimonic possession. For his self-doubts—“I don't really exist since I can't affect anyone” —eat away at his innards; he lives and breathes and walks in a loneliness which is subtle and insidious. It is not surprising that he gets a gun and trains it on some passer-by—also anonymous to him. And it is not surprising that the young men in the streets, who are only anonymous digits in their society, should gang together in violent attacks to make sure their assertion is felt.
Loneliness and its stepchild, alienation, can become forms of demon possession. Surrendering ourselves to the impersonal daimonic pushes us into an anonymity which is also impersonal; we serve nature’s gross purposes on the lowest common denominator, which often means with violence.”
― Love and Will

“The new basis for care is shown by the interest of psychologists and philosophers in emphasizing feeling as the basis of human existence. We now need to establish feeling as a legitimate aspect of our way of relating to reality. When William James says, “Feeling is everything,” he means not that there is nothing more than feeling, but that everything starts there. Feeling commits one, ties one to the object, and ensures action. But in the decades after James made this "existentialist" statement, feeling became demoted and was disparaged as merely subjective. Reason or, more accurately, technical reason was the guide to the way issues were to be settled. We said “I feel” as a synonym for “I vaguely believe” when we didn't know—little realizing that we cannot know except as we feel.”
― Love and Will
― Love and Will