53 books
—
10 voters
Biomedical Books
Showing 1-50 of 149
![Handbook of Biomedical Instrumentation [May 01, 2003] Khandpur, R. S.](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1387700449l/6180089._SX50_.jpg)
by (shelved 4 times as biomedical)
avg rating 4.06 — 278 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 3 times as biomedical)
avg rating 3.81 — 9,753 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as biomedical)
avg rating 4.02 — 2,751 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 2 times as biomedical)
avg rating 4.34 — 112,097 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as biomedical)
avg rating 4.13 — 792,348 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as biomedical)
avg rating 4.07 — 9,207 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 2 times as biomedical)
avg rating 3.95 — 55 ratings — published 1981

by (shelved 2 times as biomedical)
avg rating 3.95 — 229 ratings — published 1973

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.05 — 418 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.53 — 1,026 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.27 — 41 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.15 — 75 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.87 — 370 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 2.00 — 1 rating — published 1988

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.02 — 182 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.24 — 67 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.05 — 5,347 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.70 — 27 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.73 — 156 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.99 — 5,033 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.58 — 12,449 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.06 — 27,765 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.07 — 5,850 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.84 — 430 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.39 — 28 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.35 — 54,540 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.29 — 14,466 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.10 — 20 ratings — published 1982

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 5.00 — 3 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.40 — 135 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 0.0 — 0 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.67 — 1,459 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.50 — 2 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.18 — 1,062 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.93 — 699 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.97 — 230 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.50 — 8 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 5.00 — 1 rating — published

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 5.00 — 1 rating — published

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.63 — 225 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.44 — 63 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.00 — 1 rating — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.37 — 166 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.41 — 278,026 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.40 — 943 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.81 — 433 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.16 — 179,330 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 4.42 — 31 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.95 — 814 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as biomedical)
avg rating 3.91 — 1,513 ratings — published 1967
“Stopping in the 1970s, "Hybridity" as the fifth and final chapter is less of an end point than a certain realization of the artifice, plasticity, and technology that Wells and Loeb envisioned as the future of the human relationship to living matter as well as of the "catastrophic" situation that Georges Canghuilhem (following Kurt Goldstein) saw in life subjected to the milieu of the laboratory.”
― Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies
― Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies

“Based on what I saw over a decade of medical treatment, you may be in serious trouble if you do not have knowledge of human health and biomedical systems.”
―
―