“Contrary to this view, for Integral Philosophy there is no succession of philosophers working their thematics like a ladder, but rather the discovery of a large pre–established pattern of thematics that inevitably has to be analyzed as to how they appear in historical succession, forming between them specific patterns of worldviews. This is possible because Integral Philosophy proposes a philosophy that is not based on the thematics of philosophy—metaphysical, ontological, ethical, and so forth—but on a structural totality that questions all life, consulting all the levels and degrees that imply specialization of knowledge. The”