“One way or another, all of these approaches invoke contortions in order to not accept superpositions like the one written above as the true and complete description of nature. As Everett would later put it, “The Copenhagen Interpretation is hopelessly incomplete because of its a priori reliance on classical physics . . . as well as a philosophic monstrosity with a ‘reality’ concept for the macroscopic world and denial of the same for the microcosm.”