To answer questions about
The Mind's Eye,
please sign up.
Benjamin L.
I'd say its very heavily weighted towards the patient's experiences. There is some discussion on brain function but its very brief and simplistic, and lacks any attempt at synthesis or insight. Its just enough to contextualise the pathology of the patient but doesn't seek to understand the brain in any depth.
Sherry Hinman
In a way, it's about both. In each chapter, Sacks talks about one or more patients (and sometimes it's about people who contact him after they read about his patients in previous books). He describes their experiences and explains them the best he can, by relating them to what we know about the brain.
The theme of the book is disturbances related to vision. So a chapter might be about loss of depth of vision, blindness, loss of central vision, and so on. There is also a chapter on his own experience with a tumour on the back of his eye, including how a detailed description of how it changed how he saw the world and also how he coped with it emotionally.
His descriptions are so clear, personal, and compassionate, that you really feel you are getting to know the people and what they go through.
The theme of the book is disturbances related to vision. So a chapter might be about loss of depth of vision, blindness, loss of central vision, and so on. There is also a chapter on his own experience with a tumour on the back of his eye, including how a detailed description of how it changed how he saw the world and also how he coped with it emotionally.
His descriptions are so clear, personal, and compassionate, that you really feel you are getting to know the people and what they go through.
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more