Claire Voyant
asked
Luigi Pascal Rondanini:
Yesterday while reading Act One of "The Ghosts of the Past" with a group of friends here in Brighton, an interesting debate came up. A woman from Naples believes Antonio harbours some resentment or hatred towards the city, but I disagree. I think he has affection for Naples. What do you make of this? Does the text support the idea that Antonio loves Naples, despite his criticisms and frustrations with aspects of it?
Luigi Pascal Rondanini
Hello Claire,
Based on the question you posed about Antonio's relationship with Naples, I appreciate you sparking an insightful debate amongst your reading group. The Neapolitan woman perceives Antonio as harbouring resentment towards the city due to his biting criticism. However, I argue that glimpses of affection for his complicated hometown also emerge through his enduring connection to its culture, politics, and spaces, despite frustrations. This complexity aligns with realistic psychology - our birthplaces influence identities while also inflicting hurt, tangling love with hate.
Well-crafted ambiguity leaves room to empathise with either stance on Antonio’s sentiments. The author avoids definitive judgment, allowing readers to interpret this nuanced character actively. The disagreement produced is a testament to an impactful narrative technique that embraces the tensions within human emotions regarding charged topics like homelands. I applaud this approach for portraying Antonio’s relationship with Naples as conflicted yet genuine rather than simplistic. The dialogue generated does credit to my storytelling and characterisation. However, if I were a Neapolitan reader, I have to say that I would be more inclined towards my "paisana's" views. I hope this answers your question. Thank you for that. Regards, LP
Based on the question you posed about Antonio's relationship with Naples, I appreciate you sparking an insightful debate amongst your reading group. The Neapolitan woman perceives Antonio as harbouring resentment towards the city due to his biting criticism. However, I argue that glimpses of affection for his complicated hometown also emerge through his enduring connection to its culture, politics, and spaces, despite frustrations. This complexity aligns with realistic psychology - our birthplaces influence identities while also inflicting hurt, tangling love with hate.
Well-crafted ambiguity leaves room to empathise with either stance on Antonio’s sentiments. The author avoids definitive judgment, allowing readers to interpret this nuanced character actively. The disagreement produced is a testament to an impactful narrative technique that embraces the tensions within human emotions regarding charged topics like homelands. I applaud this approach for portraying Antonio’s relationship with Naples as conflicted yet genuine rather than simplistic. The dialogue generated does credit to my storytelling and characterisation. However, if I were a Neapolitan reader, I have to say that I would be more inclined towards my "paisana's" views. I hope this answers your question. Thank you for that. Regards, LP
More Answered Questions
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more