Elizabeth Good
asked
Stephen P. Kiernan:
Hi Stephen! I have a few "technical issues" for lack of a better phrase, with your wonderful new book, Universe of Two. A bit detailed to explain but maybe you can look at my review to see the issues which confused me? There were two tiny details which didn't track for me, and one other conclusion about Brenda not returning to Chicago which seemed odd. Curious if I did not understand correctly. Wonderful book though!!
Stephen P. Kiernan
This answer contains spoilers…
(view spoiler)[Hi Elizabeth. My heartfelt apologies for taking so long to answer. I simply didn't see your question until this morning.
Thanks for the many kind things you said in your review, and for raising questions that reveal you as a sharp reader.
First, you are right that there is a sentence at the end of the Chicago setting which puts the seasons out of order. Somehow that snuck by me, my editor-who-misses-nothing, copy editors, etc. This kind of thing happens when I write a first draft that is waaay too long, and trim 35,000 words to reach the final draft. Sometimes chronology gets confused with that much cutting. It is, of course, mortifying to see the error in print.
Brenda did not go back to Chicago, despite her brother being there, because it was a place of loss and bad decisions for her. Also from 1945 forward she was busy travelling the world with Charlie, studying great organs, and then they settled in Massachusetts. (Many people involved in the Manhattan Project, from the lowest levels to the highest, did not return to the place they'd been before the war.) Above all, I felt that her devotion to him, and to repairing both of their consciences, would be a full time and lifelong endeavor.
Thanks again for your keen eye, and for reading my work. (hide spoiler)]
Thanks for the many kind things you said in your review, and for raising questions that reveal you as a sharp reader.
First, you are right that there is a sentence at the end of the Chicago setting which puts the seasons out of order. Somehow that snuck by me, my editor-who-misses-nothing, copy editors, etc. This kind of thing happens when I write a first draft that is waaay too long, and trim 35,000 words to reach the final draft. Sometimes chronology gets confused with that much cutting. It is, of course, mortifying to see the error in print.
Brenda did not go back to Chicago, despite her brother being there, because it was a place of loss and bad decisions for her. Also from 1945 forward she was busy travelling the world with Charlie, studying great organs, and then they settled in Massachusetts. (Many people involved in the Manhattan Project, from the lowest levels to the highest, did not return to the place they'd been before the war.) Above all, I felt that her devotion to him, and to repairing both of their consciences, would be a full time and lifelong endeavor.
Thanks again for your keen eye, and for reading my work. (hide spoiler)]
More Answered Questions
Linda C
asked
Stephen P. Kiernan:
I really liked "The Baker's Secret" but there were some scathing reviews that the setting wasn't authentic, i.e. French bakeries would never make cinnamon rolls, and by default, you didn't do the necessary research for a historical novel. How would you respond to those complaints?
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more