Jack Pittorino
asked:
is Bernard Marx a likeable character?, I want to like the character Bernard but there are times when I start to think he is a wuss and unreliable and I start losing faith in him, thats just how I Feel about the character at the moment
To answer questions about
Brave New World,
please sign up.
Rob
I feel like BNW has two protagonists, who function kind of like binocular lenses (if you'll pardon the metaphor) -- Bernard and John Savage.
Play along: if you close one eye, you still have factual information in front of you -- there's he chair, there's the door -- but you lose your depth perception. With both eyes open, we get visual facts and we better understand the relationship between these facts.
I felt this way about Bernard and John. Neither of them is wholly likable, and neither of them alone can give us a full understanding. Looking only through the lens of Bernard left me with some facts, but it was a monocular view that left me dissatisfied. He begins to introduce us to the flaws inherent in his society, but we aren't quite fully equipped to make judgments yet. When the character of John comes into play, we start to see it through his lens, and our perception of reality is more rich. John by himself would be equally as unsatisfying as Bernard by himself, but together they give us depth.
TLDR: Bernard is intelligent yet selfish, and not completely likable; but I think he's only one half of our mechanism for understanding Huxley's Truth.
Play along: if you close one eye, you still have factual information in front of you -- there's he chair, there's the door -- but you lose your depth perception. With both eyes open, we get visual facts and we better understand the relationship between these facts.
I felt this way about Bernard and John. Neither of them is wholly likable, and neither of them alone can give us a full understanding. Looking only through the lens of Bernard left me with some facts, but it was a monocular view that left me dissatisfied. He begins to introduce us to the flaws inherent in his society, but we aren't quite fully equipped to make judgments yet. When the character of John comes into play, we start to see it through his lens, and our perception of reality is more rich. John by himself would be equally as unsatisfying as Bernard by himself, but together they give us depth.
TLDR: Bernard is intelligent yet selfish, and not completely likable; but I think he's only one half of our mechanism for understanding Huxley's Truth.
winnie m.
I thought he would be the hero of this book until he started using John for his own selfish desires. Ugh, I agree with you that Bernard is a complete wuss. :)
Luke
This is an important and interesting observation. Many dystopian novels seem to frame their rebel protagonists as infallible heroes (or at the VERY least, likeable people). But Huxley seems to decide against it, as you point out. Bernard is selfish, weak-willed, and spiteful. He doesn't cry out against the injustice of the dystopia he lives in (as say, the protagonist of 1984 or the Hunger Games might) but does whatever gives him ample opportunity to gain respect or power over others.
I don't believe the intent was him to be likeable, with the exception of several positive qualities.
I don't believe the intent was him to be likeable, with the exception of several positive qualities.
Timothy Morrison
not really. some females want to orgy porgy with him, but there is something wrong with him, alcohol in his blood surogate
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more