Kathryn Rogers

Which war of the rose sea book is better: Alison weirs or Dan Jones?

To answer questions about The Wars of the Roses, please sign up.
Steve Kinnard Dan Jones's book is a relatively easy read with a very polished narrative for easy consumption. Jones, however, in his attempt to tell a "story" rather than an academic historical account, tends to gloss on a fair number of things. His book tends to have a bit of a "York wasn't such a bad guy" tone to it, and in doing so he doesn't really dig deep into any of the nuance and motivations for York's actions, nor the terms of his (repeated) punishments for what was essentially treason.

Weir's book is a lot more academic. I also think it's a good place to mention Michael Hicks' Wars of the Roses. It's probably the "best" in terms of historical research and analysis, being far more critical of the contemporary sources (mostly written in Edward IV's reign) than either Weir or Jones, but it's a little clumsily written (a fair amount of repetition and the occasional reference to future events that somebody unfamiliar with the time period may get confused by) and ponderous at times, so might only interest people really interested in the topic.

I'd pick from between the three, depending on whether you want the Easy (Jones), Medium (Weir), or Expert (Hicks) difficulty version of the story.
Paige I personally have not read anything by Dan Jones (will add it to my to read list!) but I have always enjoyed Weirs for the fact that its informational in the sense that its not embellishing conversations or scenarios to be more like historical fiction/drama, but she writes in such a way that its still vivid and entertaining.
Image for The Wars of the Roses
Rate this book
Clear rating

About Goodreads Q&A

Ask and answer questions about books!

You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.

See Featured Authors Answering Questions

Learn more