Poll

We haven't done this in a while, but the mods and I thought that it'd be fun to do another round of Would You Rather. Please vote and comment explaining why you made your choice.

*This Would You Rather question was created by Lisarenee

Would you rather have access to all the books that would ever be considered such in the past, present, or future?
 
  53 votes, 62.4%

Would you rather write several books declared to be some of the best books ever written or...
 
  32 votes, 37.6%


Poll added by: Sashana



Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth Lang I would like to write several declared to be some of the best ever, for the sense of personal achievement. It's nice being able to read other great works but it wouldn't be as personal. Given the difference of being the athlete or the audience, I would rather be the athlete.


message 2: by Lisa Kay (new)

Lisa Kay This is a tough one; however, as much as I'd like to have written several great books, I'd rather read the best (since I read so much).


message 3: by Emily May (new)

Emily May The second option was tempting but I've found that what are 'considered' to be the best books ever written, I don't always agree with. To the Lighthouse, for example.


message 4: by Sashana (new)

Sashana I would rather reading the great books instead of writing them. At the end of the day I am a reader, not a writer. I can count on one hand how many great books I've read. It'd be nice to have all of the greats books in the world because nothing beats the feeling of reading an epic book.


message 5: by Sashana (new)

Sashana Emily wrote: "The second option was tempting but I've found that what are 'considered' to be the best books ever written, I don't always agree with. To the Lighthouse, for example."

Great point, Emily.


message 6: by Mallory (new)

Mallory I agree with Emily's point too. But in the wording of the question it *sounds* like the great books of the present, past, and future would be numerous. I would probably take my chances with the latter choice.


message 7: by Lisa Kay (new)

Lisa Kay Emily wrote: "The second option was tempting but I've found that what are 'considered' to be the best books ever written, I don't always agree with. To the Lighthouse, for example."

I thought of that. I don't always agree either. That is what made this so hard!


message 8: by A.F. (new)

A.F. I'm a writer and what writer wouldn't want to pen the best books ever written?


message 9: by Annie (new)

Annie I would rather read than write. I have a hard time putting my thoughts on paper. I can say things better than write them down.


message 10: by Nairabell (new)

Nairabell I went for the have access to the books, partly because that's likely to be a lot of awesome books and partly because it doesn't rule out the idea of me writing some of them (even though I'm not a writer). Best of both worlds :)


message 11: by Morgan (new)

Morgan Vank I am not much of a writer nor do I like to write so I want full access to books so I dont have to wait and put holds, or throw away $20 or have to wait weeks when the person DOESNT RETURN THE BOOK!!!!


message 12: by Katherine (new)

Katherine I rather have the money that you gain for writing several books than have access to the books of the past, present, and future. I could easly go to a book story/library and get the book I want to read and still have money to spare. But If I had to choose now, I would go for the books because I am a terrible writer and would love to have first look at the new Sookie Stackhouse Books.


message 13: by Crystal (new)

Crystal I would rather have full access to books simply because I'm more of a reader than I am a writer.


message 14: by Aneeqah (new)

Aneeqah I would have access to all the books, because I wouldn't want anybody criticizing my book. It would hurt my feeling too much. Plus, reading others' books is just more fun.


message 15: by Natalia (new)

Natalia I voted for access to all books, I just think it would be amazing to experience those great books that others have, are, and will read.


message 16: by Amy J. (new)

Amy J. I'd rather be the writer of the great works, because I'd have a lasting impact on multiple generations.


message 17: by Kirsten (new)

Kirsten I'd rather be able to access them all than write them, as I'm not much of a writer and can only imagine the countless years it would take to write "several" books like that :P


message 18: by Rebecca NJ (new)

Rebecca NJ This was tough but I would much rather have access to all books. Can you imagine what amazing reads are out there beyond our grasp! Can this also include that I don't need to work any more ;)


message 19: by Shannon (new)

Shannon I'm not a writer I'm a reader so I had to go with #2!! Oh the fantasy!!


message 20: by Koosh (last edited Jul 22, 2011 03:19AM) (new)

Koosh I voted for the first option.
I'm not a writer either but that would only mean that being able to write some of the best books ever, is a greater achievement than I could ever imagined possible. (However, at the same time I do know that is unlikely, so I wouldn't mind just reading those books then....).


message 21: by Chelly (new)

Chelly It's a difficult choice, but I am a reader first and the opportunity to read some of the best is too tempting to pass up


message 22: by Cherrylea (new)

Cherrylea I love to write and I love getting lost in a world I made - usually this world is tailored to my preferences, so it's obviously for the best! (So, yeah - I guess I chose the first option!)


message 23: by Kylee (new)

Kylee Sartwell I would love to write several books to be some of the best written because I have be writing stuff for years, so it would be great to someday write to be published.


message 24: by Emespre (new)

Emespre I was so close to choosing the second option, but had to choose the first. Like Emily said, it's not a guarantee that I'd consider what was considered the best books ever written to actually be the best books ever written. Plus I'd rather write several amazing books that made people think and contributed to other people's lives, be able to use the money to help people and buy more books, and just read whatever I wanted to when it came out.


back to top

Members can create polls
widget


Theadora 1178 books
6 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Chelsea 5634 books
123 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Kirsten 1921 books
191 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Tammy 221 books
70 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Jessica 877 books
51 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Morgan 3632 books
54 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Aneeqah 1261 books
125 friends
voted for:
Would you ra




Emespre 1587 books
8 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Stefanie 897 books
34 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Carlyn Jane 1985 books
36 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Kristine 896 books
4 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Parvathy 776 books
223 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Cacophony 2990 books
31 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Jennifer 2065 books
87 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


whimsicalmeerkat 3294 books
83 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Nicole 2430 books
65 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Sanjana 1887 books
32 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Emily May 6258 books
5000 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Lina 6380 books
119 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Andrea 11477 books
58 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Pamela 867 books
33 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Donna (BLHmistress) 1812 books
996 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Elizabeth 147 books
152 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Salena 903 books
149 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Chelsey 1063 books
4 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Virginia 1482 books
8 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Fran 167 books
37 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


~Megan~ 3263 books
164 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


Natalia 1449 books
19 friends
voted for:
Would you ra


More...