Home
My Books
Browse ▾
Recommendations
Choice Awards
Genres
Giveaways
New Releases
Lists
Explore
News & Interviews
Genres
Art
Biography
Business
Children's
Christian
Classics
Comics
Cookbooks
Ebooks
Fantasy
Fiction
Graphic Novels
Historical Fiction
History
Horror
Memoir
Music
Mystery
Nonfiction
Poetry
Psychology
Romance
Science
Science Fiction
Self Help
Sports
Thriller
Travel
Young Adult
More Genres
Community ▾
Groups
Quotes
Ask the Author
Sign In
Join
Sign up
View profile
Profile
Friends
Groups
Discussions
Comments
Reading Challenge
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Quotes
Favorite genres
Friends’ recommendations
Account settings
Help
Sign out
Home
My Books
Browse ▾
Recommendations
Choice Awards
Genres
Giveaways
New Releases
Lists
Explore
News & Interviews
Genres
Art
Biography
Business
Children's
Christian
Classics
Comics
Cookbooks
Ebooks
Fantasy
Fiction
Graphic Novels
Historical Fiction
History
Horror
Memoir
Music
Mystery
Nonfiction
Poetry
Psychology
Romance
Science
Science Fiction
Self Help
Sports
Thriller
Travel
Young Adult
More Genres
Community ▾
Groups
Quotes
Ask the Author
poll:
Myself and the other mods have been surprised at the enthusiasm members have shown for the 'one time only' genre specific review rounds that have been set up for the 100th group celebration.
Which leads to the question, should the group move to genre specific rounds?
The downsides are that some genre rounds, especially more 'niche' ones might be difficult to fill, and after a few groups, organising non-reciprocal reviews, if the same people join over and over again, could be problematic.
Upsides would be that authors could be confident that their reviewers understand their genre.
As always, groups are set up when we have mods willing and available. Some mods only mod one group at a time, so instead of a 'general' group being set up every couple of weeks, you could wait months for another group in your specific genre.
The number/types of rounds we can run depends on the number of mods, their availability and their willingness to mod a particular group.
—> people who voted for:
No, keep it as it is, with general, clean and 18+ categories.
Showing 1-17 of 17
Christine
3 books
2 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Denis
212 books
36 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Dolly
164 books
47 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Esosa
193 books
257 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
TC
114 books
0 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Ed
2306 books
110 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Nikki
77 books
7 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
P.J.
168 books
39 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Jenna
178 books
24 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Ian
116 books
41 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Juliette
113 books
57 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Elissa
261 books
5 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
James
586 books
771 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Marco
89 books
15 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Ubiquitous
97 books
43 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Shirley
26388 books
1111 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
Jennifer
1692 books
162 friends
voted for:
No, keep it
all voters
back to poll »
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.