The Starfish and the Spider: The Unstoppable Power of Leaderless Organizations
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
9%
Flag icon
a decentralized society—flexibility, shared power, ambiguity—made the Apaches immune to attacks that would have destroyed a centralized society.
9%
Flag icon
This is the first major principle of decentralization: when attacked, a decentralized organization tends to become even more open and decentralized.
14%
Flag icon
for the starfish to move, one of the arms must convince the other arms that it’s a good idea to do so.
14%
Flag icon
the second principle of decentralization: it’s easy to mistake starfish for spiders.
15%
Flag icon
At Alcoholics Anonymous, no one’s in charge. And yet, at the same time, everyone’s in charge. It’s Nevins’s open system in action. The organization functions just like a starfish.
15%
Flag icon
The one thing that does remain constant is the recovery principle—the famous twelve steps.
15%
Flag icon
There’s no application form, and nobody owns AA. Nobody owns AA.
16%
Flag icon
It’s not that open systems necessarily make better decisions. It’s just that they’re able to respond more quickly because each member has access to knowledge and the ability to make direct use of it.
16%
Flag icon
This brings us to the third principle of decentralization: an open system doesn’t have central intelligence; the intelligence is spread throughout the system.
16%
Flag icon
The fourth principle of decentralization is that open systems can easily mutate.
17%
Flag icon
As soon as an outside force presents itself, the decentralized organization quickly mutates to meet the new challenge or need.
17%
Flag icon
the decentralized organization sneaks up on you. Because the decentralized organization mutates so quickly, it can also grow incredibly quickly.
19%
Flag icon
This is the sixth principle of decentralization: as industries become decentralized, overall profits decrease.
19%
Flag icon
Is there a person in charge?
19%
Flag icon
Are there headquarters?
20%
Flag icon
If you thump it on the head, will it die?
20%
Flag icon
Is there a clear division of roles?
20%
Flag icon
If you take out a unit, is the organization harmed?
20%
Flag icon
Are knowledge and power concentrated or distributed?
21%
Flag icon
Is the organization flexible or rigid?
21%
Flag icon
Can you count the employees or participants?
21%
Flag icon
Are working groups funded by the organization, or are they self-funding?
22%
Flag icon
Do working groups communicate directly or through intermediaries?
26%
Flag icon
people don’t notice or care whether they’re interacting with a spider or with a starfish. As long as they’re given freedom, as long as they can do what they want to do, they’re happy.
29%
Flag icon
the seventh principle of decentralization: put people into an open system and they’ll automatically want to contribute.
34%
Flag icon
A decentralized organization stands on five legs. As with the starfish, it can lose a leg or two and still survive. But when you have all the legs working together, a decentralized organization can really take off.
34%
Flag icon
LEG 1: Circles
34%
Flag icon
Each Apache group resembled a circle: independent and autonomous.
34%
Flag icon
membership in an Apache circle was rather exclusive. The only way for outsiders to join a circle, in fact, was to be taken in battle. But once brought into a circle, members were accepted as Apache—whether by birth, adoption, or capture. That’s the thing about circles: once you join, you’re an equal. It’s then up to you to contribute to the best of your ability.
35%
Flag icon
On the other hand, when circles take on more than fourteen or so members, the bond breaks down. Members become more anonymous, and that opens the door to free-riding or destructive behavior. No longer does everyone have to pull their weight.
35%
Flag icon
Because circles don’t have hierarchy and structure, it’s hard to maintain rules within them; no one really has the power to enforce them. But circles aren’t lawless. Instead of rules, they depend on norms. AA has norms about confidentiality and support. Wikipedia has norms for editing entries. The Apache software has norms for developing code. Burning Man has norms for maintaining a gift economy.
35%
Flag icon
The norms, in fact, become the backbone of the circle.
35%
Flag icon
virtual circles have become more anonymous, they’re still based on trust.
36%
Flag icon
“Wikipedia proves that people are basically good.”
36%
Flag icon
LEG 2: The Catalyst
36%
Flag icon
In open organizations, a catalyst is the person who initiates a circle and then fades away into the background.
36%
Flag icon
The creator of eMule is the ultimate catalyst. No one knows who he or she is, and he or she has certainly ceded control: the source code for the program is right there for anyone to use.
Viktor
makes me think of btc
37%
Flag icon
In letting go of the leadership role, the catalyst transfers ownership and responsibility to the circle.
37%
Flag icon
A catalyst isn’t usually in it for praise and accolades. When his or her job is done, a catalyst knows it’s time to move on.
37%
Flag icon
Once the catalyst leaves, however, his or her presence is still felt. The catalyst is an inspirational fig...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
37%
Flag icon
A catalyst is like the architect of a house: he’s essential to the long-term structural integrity, but he doesn’t move in.
37%
Flag icon
LEG 3: Ideology
37%
Flag icon
The engineers at Apache don’t get paid a penny. They’re motivated by a desire to create a better product. They believe in an open system and respect one another’s contributions—not because they have to but because they want to.
37%
Flag icon
Ideology is the glue that holds decentralized organizations together.
38%
Flag icon
LEG 4: The Preexisting Network
38%
Flag icon
The Quakers had over twenty thousand members in England alone. They were already well versed in working together in circles and shared a common ideology. For eighteen years, Sharp went around England trying to win over the public and the courts. But without an army, the effort was quixotic. It was too difficult to build a brand-new decentralized organization, especially with the vast majority of people supporting slavery. But the Quakers gave the movement a platform.
38%
Flag icon
Almost every decentralized organization that has made it big was launched from a preexisting platform.
Viktor
As soon as eth hits mainstream, the world will become more decentralized, faster.
39%
Flag icon
centralized organizations aren’t set up to launch decentralized movements.
39%
Flag icon
Without circles, there isn’t the infrastructure for people to get involved and take ownership of an idea.
39%
Flag icon
In Sharp’s day, decentralized organizations were a rarity and entrance into them was difficult, but today the Internet serves as an open platform on the back of which a wide variety of starfish organizations can be launched.
Viktor
Though internet is centralized to a few compankes owning the infraatructure
« Prev 1 3 4