The Song of the Cell: An Exploration of Medicine and the New Human
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
35%
Flag icon
An antibody, in short, can be conceived as a molecule with multiple parts—the
35%
Flag icon
binding prongs
35%
Flag icon
and a shaft that enables it to liaise with the immune system to become a p...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
35%
Flag icon
if the structure of antibodies was malleable, then the genes that encoded them must also be malleable—by mutation.
35%
Flag icon
Proteins don’t grow on command, but cells do.
36%
Flag icon
When an antigen binds to one such B cell
36%
Flag icon
it is stimulated and begins to outgrow all the others.
36%
Flag icon
clonal selection: the selection of an individual cell capable of binding an antigen.
36%
Flag icon
Ultimately, the B cell matures into a cell so single-mindedly dedicated to antibody production that its structure and metabolism are altered to facilitate the process. It is now a cell dedicated to making antibodies—a plasma cell. Some of these plasma cells also become long lived and retain the memory of the infection.
37%
Flag icon
Rituxan was among the first monoclonal antibodies against cancer.
37%
Flag icon
“Using cells to fight cells,” he marveled. “We never really thought about all that we could do when we raised that first antibody.”
37%
Flag icon
these cells would become the epicenter of one of the defining epidemics in human history.
37%
Flag icon
Why aren’t the chronic viruses vanquished by the immune system—especially by T cells?II
38%
Flag icon
This is what viruses do: they “go native.”
38%
Flag icon
What, then, prevents any virus from using every cell in our body as a perfect microbial sanctuary?
38%
Flag icon
The subtle, wise, discerning T cell.
38%
Flag icon
your T cells can recognize virally infected cells only if they come from your body, not someone else’s.III
38%
Flag icon
It was as if the T cell was capable of asking two independent questions.
38%
Flag icon
It is as if the MHC protein is a frame. Without the right frame, or context (“yourself”), the T cell cannot even see the picture, even if it is a distorted version of the “self.” And without the picture in the frame
38%
Flag icon
the T cell cannot recognize the infected cell. It needs both the pathogen and the self—the picture and the frame.V
38%
Flag icon
“That protein, NP, never makes it to the cell surface,”
38%
Flag icon
“As far as cell surface proteins are concerned, there is nothing for a NP-detecting T cell to see,”
38%
Flag icon
Rather, the cells were detecting viral peptides—small
39%
Flag icon
The self, yes, but the altered self.
39%
Flag icon
was actually a carrier, a peptide bearer, and a “frame.”
39%
Flag icon
One part of a finger touches the self, one part makes contact with the foreign. When both are touched, recognition is achieved.
39%
Flag icon
Our immune system is built on both the recognition of self and of its distortion. It is designed, by evolution, to detect the altered self.
39%
Flag icon
a majority of peptides derived from pathogens outside the cell
39%
Flag icon
are presented by class II MHCs.
39%
Flag icon
Rather, this T cell is an orchestrator.
39%
Flag icon
“helper” T cell. Its job is to bridge the innate and adaptive immune system—macrophages
40%
Flag icon
There is a duality in the immune system: one recognition system needs no cellular context
40%
Flag icon
while the other is triggered only when the foreign protein is presented in the context of a cell
40%
Flag icon
first human disease to be characterized by the selective loss of a specific T cell subset,
40%
Flag icon
the CD4 cell is not so much a helper as it is the master machinator of the entire immune system, the coordinator, the central nexus through which virtually all immune information flows.
42%
Flag icon
“A clear nonconfluent margin separates different species or [even] different specimens belonging to the same species.”
42%
Flag icon
It’s not invasion, the ecologists insist. It’s interconnectedness.
42%
Flag icon
Even early physiologists noted that the rejection of the nonself—and the strict definition of boundaries—was a feature of human tissues.
43%
Flag icon
They present peptides to a T cell so that a T cell can detect infections and other invaders and mount an immune response. And they are also the determinants by which one person’s cells are distinguished from another person’s cells, thereby defining the boundaries of an organism.
43%
Flag icon
The self is defined, in part, by what is forbidden to attack it.
43%
Flag icon
T cells are born in the bone marrow as immature cells and migrate to the thymus to mature.
43%
Flag icon
Immunity and its opposite are twinned: the Cain of inflammation conjoined with the Abel of tolerance.
44%
Flag icon
once the barrier to the self has been broken, everything that is self can be under attack.
44%
Flag icon
called cancer a “distorted version of our normal selves.”
44%
Flag icon
This double-headed problem—cancer’s kinship to the self and its immunological invisibility—is the oncologist’s nemesis.
45%
Flag icon
increasingly imagining the immune system as a knowable machine, with movable—manipulable, decipherable, changeable—cogs, gears, and parts.
46%
Flag icon
Asymptomatic/presymptomatic transmission. Exponential growth. The two critical ingredients in the recipe for a pandemic had already been established by that innocuous-seeming report.
46%
Flag icon
unpredictable, mysterious deadliness.
46%
Flag icon
is one of the key detectors of viral invasion.
46%
Flag icon
soon after infection, the virus “reprograms” the infected cell.