Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion
Rate it:
Open Preview
24%
Flag icon
People will use the actions of others to decide how to behave, especially when they view those others as similar to themselves.
24%
Flag icon
children who saw a film depicting a child’s positive visit to the dentist lowered their own dental anxieties principally when they were the same age as the child in the film.
25%
Flag icon
each front-page suicide story killed fifty-eight people who otherwise would have gone on living.
28%
Flag icon
“We created fake queues [of paid actors] in front of twenty stores around the country to drum up interest.”
28%
Flag icon
social proof, should never be trusted fully;
28%
Flag icon
simply pointing to the popularity of an item elevates its popularity.
28%
Flag icon
Social proof is most influential under three conditions. The first is uncertainty.
28%
Flag icon
A second condition under which social proof is most influential involves “the many”:
29%
Flag icon
The third optimizing condition for social-proof information is similarity.
29%
Flag icon
“Look at all the people who are doing it,”
29%
Flag icon
recognizing that the actions of similar others should not form the sole basis for our decisions.
30%
Flag icon
Annual deaths in the United States from medical errors exceed those of all accidents,
31%
Flag icon
tall men earn more than their shorter contemporaries and are more likely to rise to positions of leadership
33%
Flag icon
Five stars is too good to be true.
33%
Flag icon
Negative reviews establish credibility.
34%
Flag icon
The way to love anything is to realize that it might be lost.
35%
Flag icon
people are intensely motivated to make choices designed to avoid losing something of value—to
35%
Flag icon
people are more driven by the prospect of losing an item of value than by the prospect of gaining it—is
35%
Flag icon
Apple’s phone division, which is infamous for undersupplying its stores on the day of a launch.
36%
Flag icon
The wisdom of offering abundant items for sale one at a time recognizes that abundance is the opposite of scarcity and, consequently, presenting an item in abundance reduces its perceived value.
36%
Flag icon
Scarcity—highlighting items low in stock. Social Proof—describing most popular and trending items. Urgency—using time limits, often with a countdown timer. Concessions—offering discounts for visitors to stay on the site. Authority/Expertise—informing visitors of alternative products that are available. Liking—including a welcoming message.
36%
Flag icon
in general, limited-supply appeals are more effective than limited-time appeals
38%
Flag icon
When something becomes less available, our freedom to have it is limited, and we experience an increased desire for it. We rarely recognize, however, that psychological reactance has caused us to want the item more; all we know is we want it.
39%
Flag icon
that person is going to want it more as it becomes unavailable.
39%
Flag icon
during the taste tests, it was the New Coke that was unavailable to people for purchase, so when they knew which sample was which, they showed an especially strong preference for what they couldn’t otherwise have. But, later, when the company replaced the traditional recipe with the new one, now it was the old Coke that people couldn’t have and, it became the favorite.
39%
Flag icon
when people know they’re getting something new, their desire for it will shoot up.”
39%
Flag icon
people see a thing as more desirable when it recently has become less available than when it has been scarce all along.
39%
Flag icon
It is amazing how strongly people react when you try to take things away, even if they never use them.
41%
Flag icon
Each prospect who was interested enough to want to see the car was given an appointment time—the same appointment time. So, if three people were scheduled, they were all scheduled for, say, 2:00 p.m. that afternoon. This device of simultaneous scheduling paved the way for later compliance by creating an atmosphere of competition for a limited resource.
41%
Flag icon
we are most attracted to scarce resources when we compete with others for them.
44%
Flag icon
people who got the “How are you feeling this evening?” question agreed to receive the cookie seller at their homes, nearly twice the success rate of the standard solicitation approach.
44%
Flag icon
obtain a large purchase by starting with a small one.
45%
Flag icon
you can use small commitments to manipulate a person’s self-image; you can use them to turn citizens into “public servants,” prospects into “customers,” and prisoners into “collaborators.”
45%
Flag icon
Just reducing the number of first-page fields from four to three increases registration completions by 50 percent.
46%
Flag icon
something special happens when people put their commitments on paper: they live up to what they write down.
46%
Flag icon
The developers of the app discovered that users who exposed their calorie counts to friends lost 50% more weight than a typical user.
48%
Flag icon
“He who agrees against his will / Is of the same opinion still.”
50%
Flag icon
Reminders of existing commitments possess yet another bonus. They not only restore the commitment but also appear to strengthen it by augmenting one’s related self-image.
51%
Flag icon
Psychological research indicates that we experience our feelings toward something a split second before we can intellectualize about it. I’d guess the message sent by the heart of hearts is a pure, basic feeling.
51%
Flag icon
if I could go back in time, would I make the same choice again?”
59%
Flag icon
We all admire the wisdom of those who have come to us for advice. —Ben Franklin
59%
Flag icon
giving advice is indeed a mechanism of unitization,
61%
Flag icon
focused attention to images of themselves when they would be closer to retirement led people to elevate the importance of taking care of that person.
63%
Flag icon
people check their phones on average over one hundred times a day, and 84 percent say they “couldn’t go a single day without their mobile devices.”
« Prev 1 2 Next »