Invisible Learning: The magic behind Dan Levy's legendary Harvard statistics course
Rate it:
Open Preview
12%
Flag icon
B) = P(A and
Michael
Excellent question stem!
13%
Flag icon
be plenty of analytic physicians who read the Wall Street Journal and diversify their portfolios. Suppose that only 1 in 20 physicians share these characteristics, and that all finance professors do. Then if we count the number of
Michael
Never thought of these two like this before - love it.
14%
Flag icon
The two babies had
Michael
Will want to share with my students.
62%
Flag icon
even when statistically significant results are
76%
Flag icon
the class. Those who want more rigour may be frustrated by the lack of mathematical proofs. Those who think behavioural science deserved its Nobel Prize in 2017 may be delighted by his approach
Michael
Important point about the common good.
76%
Flag icon
will be disappointed. Dan has no chance of pleasing
76%
Flag icon
of the students to ensure he is not deauthorised.
77%
Flag icon
him to teach in a certain way, perhaps more in line with the traditional method they were taught themselves. And there may be those who do not see Dan’s passion for teaching as an important asset to the school, preferring to promote top-class researchers.
90%
Flag icon
rising from his chair. “We
90%
Flag icon
years from now?” Up on the screen is a word-cloud of their responses. Figure 16.2: word cloud