More on this book
Community
Kindle Notes & Highlights
rather than having a single asset as collateral it would use multiple cryptocurrencies on the Ethereum blockchain to be more decentralized and stable. The system would be managed by a Decentralized Autonomous Organization, or DAO, called Maker. As mentioned earlier, Dan Larimer and his father, Stan, proposed the concept in September 2013,
March 14, 2016, or “Pi Day,” as Jeff Wilcke announced in a blog post. That’s when they launched Ethereum’s first production-ready version, called Homestead. The upgrade fixed some flaws found in the previous versions, and would make the network faster and more reliable. It meant that Ethereum was no longer in test mode and was finally ready for serious companies to build on.6 The network had grown considerably by the Homestead launch. It had about 5,100 nodes, compared with Bitcoin’s about 6,000, and was processing about 25,000 transactions a day, or about 10 percent of transactions in the
...more
“With Uber, Airbnb, and others leading the way, we have to ask ourselves, ‘Is this how we want to build the sharing economy?’ Monopolistic companies that take extraordinary fees and have full control of the market?” said one of Slock.it’s blog posts.1 Slock.it cofounders, including Jentzsch’s brother, wanted to make it possible for people to rent, sell, and share their property without having to use intermediaries.
Slock.it needed funding. The obvious option was a token sale. They coded up a crowdfunding contract, but then decided to take it a step further and created a smart contract that gave token holders the power to vote and decide what Slock.it should do with the funds. Still not happy, they took the concept even further, and created a true Decentralized Autonomous Organization, which would control the funds. This meant that token holders would decide where to allocate the money, and Slock.it would be just one among other proposals vying for it. It would effectively work like a decentralized
...more
The DAO code is written in the Solidity programming language and is meant to be deployed on the Ethereum blockchain. After the code is launched, ether is sent to the DAO’s smart contract address; the code creates tokens in proportion to the ether sent and sends those tokens to the accounts that sent ether. Tokens are divisible and can be freely transferable and traded. The DAO can store and transfer ether, but it doesn’t do much else. Token holders can submit proposals to use the ether collected in the DAO, and they’re given a window of time to debate and vote on them. They have voting and
...more
In the paper, Christoph proposed a way to prevent the “majority robs the minority attack,” where an attacker with 51 percent of the tokens is able to change governance and ownership rules, or simply propose and approve to send all the funds to themselves. The solution, which stemmed from a blog post by Vitalik, would be for the minority to always have the option of retrieving their funds by allowing the DAO to split. If someone disagrees with a proposal and wants to withdraw their funds, they can create a new “child DAO,” where they can move their ether and leave the rest to spend their own
...more
eleven of the most distinguished Ethereans came on as curators, including Vitalik Buterin, Gavin Wood, Alex Van de Sande, Vlad Zamfir, Fabian Vogelsteller, and Christian Reitwiessner.
By the end of the crowdsale on May 28, 12 million ether (at 100 DAO tokens per 1 ether) had flooded into an untested smart contract built with the new Solidity programming language. With ETH at around $12, that was $150 million. Ethereum’s crowdsale had been groundbreaking with $18 million raised. This was on a different order of magnitude.
After a child DAO was created, there was a seven-day waiting period before the owner could pull their ether from the main DAO, and an additional twenty-seven days before they could withdraw those funds from the child DAO. In the initial one-week period, others could also jump on board, and that’s just what the attacker did with the “lonely, so lonely” split—or, as it would be later be known, the “dark DAO.” The countdown for the “dark DAO” to be able to pull funds from the main DAO had started on June 8.
Three days after Peter’s blog post, the MakerDAO team discovered their code was vulnerable and used the hack themselves to drain their smart contract of the $80,000 that was stored in it and secure the funds.
“I still think that splitDAO may have a vulnerability,” he wrote to his student. “It violates the withdraw pattern by not zeroing the balances field until after the call. So I think it may be possible to have it move rewardTokens to a splitting DAO multiple times. This is happening on lines 640 to 666 (hah!) of DAO.sol. Am I wrong?”
The biggest project ever attempted on Ethereum, a treasure chest that held roughly 14 percent of all ether, was under attack. If the hacker was successful, he would kill not only this project, but could also kill Ethereum.
Alex Van de Sande, known to most by his internet name Avsa,
Each transaction on the blockchain has a stamp that serves as a counter, called a nonce, and the system will ignore transactions that are in the wrong order.
this option. The version of the Ethereum software client that enabled it was called “DAO Wars.”1 “We’ve released version 1.4.8 of Geth (codename ‘DAO Wars’) as a small patch release to give the community a voice to decide whether to temporarily freeze TheDAOs v1.0 from releasing funds or not,” Peter wrote in a June 24 blog post. “If the community decides to freeze the funds, only a few whitelisted accounts can retrieve
hhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Vitalik hoped it would come out stronger. He was there for a blockchain bootcamp led by Emin, the professor who kept pointing out flaws in The DAO, and developers and researchers including Alex, aka Avsa, of the Robin Hood Group; Vlad Zamfir; Casey Detrio; and Martin Becze, who introduced the Ethereum Improvement Proposals.
Emin strongly believed there was no reason to let the ether thief get away with it. He didn’t buy the whole “code is law” argument. “Code is not law,” he said. “The law is the law. We are not going to tear down an entire financial system and build a new one only to be enslaved by the algorithms that we have come up with. Monetary systems have to serve the people and if they don’t serve the people, people will find a way to replace them.”
Martin Holst Swende in his Shanghai hotel room at 4 a.m. on a Monday. It was his first day as security lead for the Ethereum Foundation.
Like Martin, most of the bug catchers had focused on consensus flaws, not on denial-of-service attacks. The thinking was that the need to pay for gas would make such attacks expensive and less likely to cause real damage. As dawn came in Shanghai that Monday, they realized just how wrong they were. Sure, they were angry at the attackers, but the prevailing feeling as they scrambled to find a solution was that this was a test. It was a pain, but ultimately a good thing because someone was forcing them to iron out flaws they hadn’t been able to catch. Ethereum was supposed to withstand exactly
...more
By the end of 2016, Ethereum had withstood two major attacks resulting in three hard forks. The whole experience was an object lesson in blockchain governance.
First Blood, an online gaming company selling tokens to be used as rewards within its games, capped its September 26 ICO at $5.5 million. The sale was over in five minutes. A company that was less than a year old was able to raise more than $1 million per minute. Ethereum’s crowdsale had taken about two months; the sale for Joey Krug’s prediction market Augur took about a month; DigixDAO, the project that wanted to tie tokens to gold bars, had its sale in less than a day; and First Blood’s took five minutes. They had all raised at least $5 million.
they would create a platform that would give liquidity to any coin, no matter how small. They called this new project Bancor. Any currency that joins the Bancor network would have to hold a small balance of a reserve currency in its smart contract, and that reserve currency would be used to trade between any other token. There was a lot of debate among the team about whether they should make the reserve currency be ether, or if they should create a specific token with that purpose. They decided to create a platform-specific token called BNT so that, over time, many blockchains, not just
...more
Taylor’s solution was to have a message pop up on MEW saying that the Status ICO was likely over based on the pending number of transactions. Average Ethereum transaction fees had spiked to a record of over $1 and block confirmation times also climbed.
