What Is Real?: The Unfinished Quest for the Meaning of Quantum Physics
Rate it:
Open Preview
22%
Flag icon
scientific theory influences the experiments that scientists choose to perform, the way new evidence is evaluated, and ultimately guides the search for new theories as well.
23%
Flag icon
Bohm laid part of the blame for the Copenhagen interpretation at the feet of logical positivism,
23%
Flag icon
Bohm pointed out, “the history of scientific research is full of examples in which it was very fruitful indeed to assume that certain objects or elements might be real, long before any procedures were known which would permit them to be observed directly.”
23%
Flag icon
Tentative concepts are needed, even before empirical evidence is available, to guide the choice and design of experiments,
23%
Flag icon
aid in their
23%
Flag icon
interpret...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
23%
Flag icon
would argue in favor of the widest possible diffusion of knowledge of all the possibilities among physicists.
23%
Flag icon
physicists ought to know of all the possibilities,
23%
Flag icon
feel that while they do not know which of these are correct, they must be ready, if necessary, to abandon even what seemed most secure a...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
23%
Flag icon
Quantum physics perfectly correlated and predicted observations, and that’s all a scientific theory needed to do on a strictly positivist account of science.
23%
Flag icon
This was the logic behind Bohr’s “rhetoric of inevitability,”
23%
Flag icon
Copenhagen interpretation was not just the correct way of understanding quantum physics—they said it was the only way to do it,
23%
Flag icon
Bohr’s camp, the search for another interpretation wasn’t just unnecessary, it was a waste of time.
23%
Flag icon
Ultimately, Pauli thought that Bohm’s ideas were simply “artificial metaphysics.”
23%
Flag icon
Bohr thought that Bohm’s theory was “very foolish,” and didn’t say much else.
23%
Flag icon
Von Neumann, meanwhile, was less dismissive; he thought Bohm’s ideas were “consistent,” and even “very elegant,” but suspected that Bohm would have difficulties extending his theory to encompass the quantum phenomenon of spin—a suspicion that ultimately proved to be wrong.
23%
Flag icon
Von Neumann’s suspicion was likely born of his own “im...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
23%
Flag icon
necessity of the Copenhagen int...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
23%
Flag icon
explanation of what had gone wrong in von Neumann’s proof, many physicists assumed the flaw was with Bohm’s theory instead—that it simply couldn’t be correct, because von Neumann had shown such theories were impossible.
23%
Flag icon
few physicists who did come around to supporting Bohm’s view:
23%
Flag icon
Louis de B...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
23%
Flag icon
Broglie’s institute in Paris became one of the few places in the world where dissent against the Copenhagen interpretation was the norm.
23%
Flag icon
Lenin himself had condemned Mach;
23%
Flag icon
“reactionary” and “solipsist.”
23%
Flag icon
positivism that hung around the Copenhagen interpretation was enough to keep most Soviet physicists from defending Bohr’s ideas publicly under Stalin’s rule.
23%
Flag icon
This led to the “age of banishment of complementarity” in the USSR,
24%
Flag icon
several of de Broglie’s students
24%
Flag icon
found both Marxism and pilot waves appealing.
24%
Flag icon
Blokhintsev and Terletsky were critical of Bohr’s principle of complementarity and the other trappings of...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
24%
Flag icon
they did not support Bohm’s int...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
24%
Flag icon
instead pursuing their own alternatives to the qu...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
24%
Flag icon
USSR, there has been much criticism of quantum theory on ideological grounds, but it produced no results,
24%
Flag icon
scared people away from these problems, rather than stimulate them.”
24%
Flag icon
Khrushchev. This freed Russian physicists who had sat at Bohr’s feet to be more vocal in their support of the Copenhagen interpretation; one of them, Vladimir Fock, campaigned for Bohr’s ideas throughout the Soviet physics education system, referring to the pilot-wave interpretation as the “Bohm-Vigier illness.”
24%
Flag icon
The USSR had already produced Lysenkoism, a bogus alternative to Darwinian evolution based on a “proper Marxist” understanding of biology.
24%
Flag icon
One Marxist in particular had it in for Bohm: Léon Rosenfeld,
24%
Flag icon
Pauli to nickname him “square root of Bohr × Trotsky.”
24%
Flag icon
Rosenfeld spent much of his time participating in this nonexistent controversy, devoting remarkable effort to preventing the spread of Bohm’s ideas.
24%
Flag icon
Rosenfeld’s views were largely shared by the physics community,
24%
Flag icon
Half a dozen of the most eminent scientists have got their knife into him. Great honor for somebody so young.”
24%
Flag icon
Rosenfeld thought Heisenberg was flirting with idealism—
24%
Flag icon
Pauli and Born thought Rosenfeld was too politically motivated in his science.
24%
Flag icon
many were troubled by an unavoidable fact of Bohm’s theory: it was nonlocal, allowing particles to influence each other instantaneously at long distances.
24%
Flag icon
introduce a second particle that interacts in any way with the first, and suddenly they are linked—entangled—
24%
Flag icon
exactly what Einstein had argued against in the EPR paper.
24%
Flag icon
To them, the manifest action at a distance in Bohm’s theory was another strike against it when compared to Copenhagen.
24%
Flag icon
question of whether Bohm’s ideas would actually lead to new research insights.
24%
Flag icon
Relativistic quantum theory, known as quantum field theory (QFT),
24%
Flag icon
active and productive area of research in the United States and Europe. QFT was originally pioneered by Dirac and was being led at the time by people like Feynman, Julian Schwinger, Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, and Freeman Dyson.
24%
Flag icon
Dirac had used it to predict the existence...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.