What Is Real?: The Unfinished Quest for the Meaning of Quantum Physics
Rate it:
Open Preview
2%
Flag icon
“shut up and calculate,” in the words of physicist David Mermin.
2%
Flag icon
Einstein pointed out, “The theory decides what we can observe.”
2%
Flag icon
The practice of science itself depends on the total content of our best scientific theories—not just the math but the story of the world that goes along with the math.
3%
Flag icon
This is a story of science as a human endeavor—not just a story about how nature works but also about how people work.
3%
Flag icon
Werner Heisenberg, the first person to glimpse the full mathematical form of quantum physics,
3%
Flag icon
Bell graduated from university in 1949, he stumbled upon a book by Max Born, another architect of quantum physics.
3%
Flag icon
von Neumann had proven that the Copenhagen interpretation was the only possible
3%
Flag icon
David Bohm had found another way to understand quantum physics.
3%
Flag icon
Bell finally returned to it—and made the most profound discovery about the nature of reality since Einstein.
3%
Flag icon
quantum physics, had a more difficult birth.
3%
Flag icon
Institute for Theoretical Physics in Copenhagen
3%
Flag icon
What does quantum physics tell us about the world?
3%
Flag icon
very simple answer: quantum physics tells us nothing whatsoever about the world.
3%
Flag icon
Copenhagen interpretation states that quantum physics is merely a tool for calculating the probabilities of various outcomes of experiments.
3%
Flag icon
only an abstract quantum physical description.”
3%
Flag icon
Heisenberg put it, “The idea of an objective real world whose smallest parts exist objectively in the same sense as stones or trees exist, independently of whether or not we observe them, is impossible.”
3%
Flag icon
Einstein couldn’t stand the Copenhagen interpretation.
3%
Flag icon
Von Neumann
3%
Flag icon
was one of the founding fathers of computer science.
4%
Flag icon
Why does quantum physics need an interpretation?
4%
Flag icon
not immediately clear what the theory is saying about the world.
4%
Flag icon
If you want to know where an electron is, you need more than three numbers—you need an infinity of them.
4%
Flag icon
called wave functions
4%
Flag icon
That’s what a wave function is, at its simplest: a set of numbers, fixed at different places.
4%
Flag icon
Schrödinger equation ensures that wave functions always change smoothly—
4%
Flag icon
Nobody’s ever seen half of an electron, or anything less than a whole electron in one well-defined place.
4%
Flag icon
predictions of quantum physics are generally in terms of probabilities, not certainties.
4%
Flag icon
Rather than following the Schrödinger equation like a good wave function, it collapses—it instantly becomes zero everywhere except in the place where you found the electron.
4%
Flag icon
This is so weird that it gets a special name: the measurement problem
4%
Flag icon
Why does the Schrödinger equation only apply when measurements aren’t happening?
4%
Flag icon
maybe quantum physics really is different.
4%
Flag icon
what is a “measurement,” anyhow?
4%
Flag icon
And where’s the divide between the quantum world of the small and the Newtonian world of the large?
4%
Flag icon
it means there’s something about the nature of reality that we don’t understand.
5%
Flag icon
no connection to the world around us at all—it’s merely a useful piece of mathematics.
5%
Flag icon
between measurements, nothing matters.
5%
Flag icon
So what is real?
5%
Flag icon
Einstein, and later on, Bell and Bohm—did so in open defiance of Copenhagen.
5%
Flag icon
different kinds of atoms each have their own distinct spectrum of colors, like a fingerprint.
5%
Flag icon
they didn’t understand what kind of internal atomic structure could be producing these spectra.
5%
Flag icon
Ernest Rutherford, Bohr proposed a “planetary” model
5%
Flag icon
discontinuous jumps of certain energies were known as quanta,
5%
Flag icon
was also incomplete, as Bohr well knew.
5%
Flag icon
could explain the colors in hydrogen’s spectrum but not the relative brightness of those colors.
5%
Flag icon
Put an atom in a magnetic field, and its spectrum changed. Put it in an electric field, and its spectrum changed in a different way. Colors shifted, blurred, and split, dimmed and brightened, with no larger pattern in sight—until Heisenberg.
5%
Flag icon
Heisenberg made a breakthrough.
5%
Flag icon
developed a strange new mathematics on the fly,
5%
Flag icon
allowed him to predict how atomic spectra respond to magnetic fields.
5%
Flag icon
Born and his student Pascual Jordan helped Heisenberg to elucidate the structure and implications of his new theory, which Born dubbed “matrix mechanics” after the unfamiliar mathematical objects at its heart.
6%
Flag icon
thermodynamics, developed in the early 1800s, were the very model of a modern physical theory,
« Prev 1 3 13