Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between February 6 - February 9, 2025
11%
Flag icon
“sure-thing principle”
11%
Flag icon
uncertainty—even irrelevant uncertainty—can paralyze us.
16%
Flag icon
meaning into a little bit of messaging. And how do you do that? You use flags.
19%
Flag icon
Proverbs are the Holy Grail of simplicity. Coming up with a short,
20%
Flag icon
The most basic way to get someone’s attention is this: Break a pattern.
22%
Flag icon
If you want your ideas to be stickier, you’ve got to break someone’s guessing machine and then fix
22%
Flag icon
(1) Identify the central message you need to communicate—find the core; (2) Figure out what is counterintuitive about the message—i.e., What are the unexpected implications of your core message? Why isn’t it already happening naturally? (3) Communicate your message in a way that breaks your audience’s guessing machines along the critical, counterintuitive dimension. Then, once their guessing machines have failed, help them refine their machines.
26%
Flag icon
One important implication of the gap theory is that we need to open gaps before we close them. Our tendency is to tell people the facts. First, though, they must realize that they need these facts. The
27%
Flag icon
“What questions do I want my audience to ask?”
27%
Flag icon
pulled the rug out from under them.
36%
Flag icon
They were suffering from the Curse of Knowledge. They had lost the ability to imagine what it was like to look at a technical drawing from the perspective of a nonexpert.
36%
Flag icon
Rather, the moral of the story is to find a “universal language,” one that everyone speaks fluently. Inevitably, that
43%
Flag icon
takeaway is that it can be the honesty and trustworthiness of our sources, not their status, that allows them to act as authorities. Sometimes antiauthorities are even better than authorities.
50%
Flag icon
People remember things better because they evoke more emotion,
52%
Flag icon
The mere act of calculation reduced people’s charity.
52%
Flag icon
Belief counts for a lot, but belief isn’t enough. For people to take action, they have to care.
55%
Flag icon
They called it Honoring the Game.
56%
Flag icon
interest. He says that the WIIFY—“what’s in it for you,” pronounced whiff-y—should be a central aspect of every speech.
57%
Flag icon
Subsequent research suggests that the hierarchical aspect of Maslow’s theory is bogus—people pursue all of these needs pretty much simultaneously. There’s no question that most starving men would rather eat than transcend,
57%
Flag icon
but there’s an awful lot of overlap in the middle.
59%
Flag icon
“Group interest” is often a better predictor of political opinions than self-interest.
62%
Flag icon
we’ve got to watch out for our old nemesis, the Curse of Knowledge, which can interfere with our ability to implement them.
64%
Flag icon
“If I look at the mass, I will never act. If I look at the one, I will.”
65%
Flag icon
(knowledge about how to act) and inspiration (motivation to act). Note
65%
Flag icon
credible idea makes people believe. An emotional idea makes people care.
67%
Flag icon
mental practice alone produced about two thirds of the benefits of actual physical practice.
70%
Flag icon
• It’s simple: Eat subs and lose weight. (It may be oversimplified, frankly, since the meatball sub with extra mayo won’t help you lose weight.) • It’s unexpected: A guy lost a ton of weight by eating fast food! This story violates our schema of fast food, a schema that’s more consistent with the picture of a fat Jared than a skinny Jared. • It’s concrete: Think of the oversized pants, the massive loss of girth, the diet composed of particular sandwiches. It’s much more like an Aesop fable than an abstraction. • It’s credible: It has the same kind of antiauthority truthfulness that we saw with ...more
72%
Flag icon
“And who is my neighbor?” In response, Jesus told a story: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he fell into the hands of robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. “A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. “But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put ...more
72%
Flag icon
Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”
72%
Flag icon
What’s missing from this tale, for modern-day readers, is a bit of context. The Samaritan in the story was not simply a nice guy. He was a nice guy crossing a huge social gulf in helping the wounded man. At the time, there was tremendous hostility between Samaritans and Jews (all the other main characters in the story). A modern-day an...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
72%
Flag icon
lesson of the story is clear: Good neighbors show mercy and compassion, and not just to people in ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
76%
Flag icon
If you’re a great spotter, you’ll always trump a great creator. Why? Because the world will always produce more great ideas than any single individual, even the most creative one.
76%
Flag icon
When students are asked to recall the speeches, 63 percent remember the stories. Only 5 percent remember any individual statistic.
77%
Flag icon
The first villain is the natural tendency to bury the lead—to get lost in a sea of information. One
77%
Flag icon
The second villain is the tendency to focus on the presentation rather than on the message.
77%
Flag icon
Pay attention 2. Understand and remember it 3. Agree/Believe 4. Care 5. Be able to act on it
78%
Flag icon
notice that the framework matches up nicely: 1. Pay attention: UNEXPECTED 2. Understand and remember it: CONCRETE 3. Agree/Believe: CREDIBLE 4. Care: EMOTIONAL 5. Be able to act on it: STORY