Conspiracy: Peter Thiel, Hulk Hogan, Gawker, and the Anatomy of Intrigue
Rate it:
Open Preview
43%
Flag icon
things that I think I’m right about,” Thiel said, “other people are in some sense not even wrong about, because they’re not thinking about them.” In this sense, it’s an
45%
Flag icon
Peter had learned from his early experiences with Gawker and the media that those with unconventional beliefs should probably keep most of what they think to themselves.
46%
Flag icon
“Psychologically, there is this weird thing where you want to brag about these things that you’re not supposed to,”
49%
Flag icon
“Gawker was basically getting free labor. And I had talked to an employment lawyer about this in New York and they said it’s one hundred percent against the law.”
53%
Flag icon
No one can be certain of the effects of what Thiel describes as “long-term strategic pressure,” but very few people, organizations, or teams can withstand it.
53%
Flag icon
Confusum est, quidquid usque in pulverem sectum est—cut anything into tiny pieces and it all becomes a mass of confusion.
53%
Flag icon
Being feared, Machiavelli says, is an important protection against a conspiracy.
54%
Flag icon
The line attributed to the management guru Peter Drucker is that culture eats strategy. It’s a truism that applies as much to conspiracies as it does to businesses. It doesn’t matter how great your plan is, it doesn’t matter who your people are, if what binds them all together is weak or toxic, so, too, will be the outcome—if
54%
Flag icon
They might not be rich, but if they can bring the rich and powerful to their knees with their writing, it might feel like the same thing.
55%
Flag icon
The effect of this over time was that Gawker was staffed by the kind of impolite, impolitic people who could not work at your average company.
56%
Flag icon
But the incentives were built into the core of the company.
58%
Flag icon
“We were not all perfectly aligned by any means,” Thiel explains about the setup between him and Hogan, between Mr. A and the lawyers, between the lawyers and everyone else, “but it was the evil nature of our enemy that was somehow super galvanizing. Even as it got to be this bigger, more complicated thing, we were able to achieve a certain unity of purpose over time.”
59%
Flag icon
It always takes longer than expected, per Hofstadter’s Law, even when—and this is the critical part—one takes Hofstadter’s
62%
Flag icon
Two armies are hurled at each other and both are thrown into confusion and disarray by the force of the collision. Victory is simple. It goes to whoever reassembles and redoubles first.
63%
Flag icon
There is a story about a young John D. Rockefeller who found himself stuck with bullying, corrupt business partners. He wants to break with them, but he can’t, because they control the votes. They are squeezing his business to death. They abuse him, talk about forcing him out. What is he to do? Quietly, Rockefeller lines up financing from another oilman and waits. Finally there is a confrontation; one of them tries to threaten him: “You really want to break it up?” Yes. He calls their bluff. They go along, knowing that the firm’s assets will have to go to auction. They’re sure they’ll ...more
63%
Flag icon
The story of this conspiracy, too, is the story of one person working while the other talked big and loud.
63%
Flag icon
“It’s a game of spouses, too,”
64%
Flag icon
“Not only were they trying to make me quit, talk me into quitting before trial, they were trying to reward me for quitting,”
64%
Flag icon
“It’s going to be a marathon,” he would say to his team, “we just can’t conk out. There are all these psychological things Gawker is going to try to do to get us to not fight as hard and we can’t let them influence us. I’m not going to try to reach a compromise. I’m not going to try to talk to them.”
66%
Flag icon
If you have a propaganda line that you keep telling people, there’s some point at which you have to start believing it.”
66%
Flag icon
“Never interrupt an enemy making a mistake.”
67%
Flag icon
They were so convinced they were the underdog that it didn’t occur to them that they might appear to be the bully.
67%
Flag icon
“It became very clear that the kind of jurors we wanted were overweight women. Most people can’t empathize with a sex tape, but overweight women are sensitive about their bodies and feel like they have been bullied on the internet. Men don’t have that problem. Attractive women don’t have that problem. They haven’t been body shamed,”
68%
Flag icon
Gawker thinks this is all kayfabe, but it’s about to become a shoot.
72%
Flag icon
The great sin for a leader, Frederick the Great once observed, was not in being defeated but in being surprised.
74%
Flag icon
“We would have hit A.J. harder, but we just didn’t think you could get blood out of a rock.”
74%
Flag icon
He had proven that “nothing you can do about it” is just what people who don’t want to do anything about it like to say to make themselves feel better about their inaction.
78%
Flag icon
“It is much better to be the last mover,” not the first mover.
78%
Flag icon
‘you must study the endgame before everything else.’”
80%
Flag icon
an army should not only leave a road for their enemy to retreat by, they should pave it.
82%
Flag icon
“The bad economist confines himself to the visible effect; the good economist takes into account both the effect that can be seen and those effects that must be foreseen.”
82%
Flag icon
He learned another important lesson in that Florida courtroom, this one also about America—that average and ordinary people cared little for the assumptions of the so-called elites. I think he also learned something about his own willingness to put up a middle finger at those elites, and how vulnerable they might be.
83%
Flag icon
Jeff Bezos had also felt the need to opine about Peter’s politics: “Peter Thiel is a contrarian, first and foremost. You just have to remember that contrarians are usually wrong.” It certainly looked that way, until November 10, and then I would get an email from Peter: “Contrarians may be mostly wrong, but when they get it right, they really get it right.”
83%
Flag icon
“but Peter endorsed Trump because of the trial. It gave him an appreciation for the dynamic of the country and for Middle America. I don’t think there is an alternate reality where he wins and doesn’t support Trump. I don’t think Peter Thiel would have been involved with Trump at all without this case.”
83%
Flag icon
would ask Mr. A what he thought of Trump, what he made of it all. He would smile and tell me, “I don’t care about politics, I only care that my friends are in power.”
83%
Flag icon
Thiel himself would take to quietly predicting to friends that there was a 50 percent chance the Trump presidency would end in catastrophic disaster.
84%
Flag icon
It is said that the weapons invented at the end of one war become the dominant killers in the next one.
85%
Flag icon
Forces, once unleashed, cannot be contained. Genies do not go back into bottles. A smart man observed that inertia is difficult to overcome in politics, but once it has been, momentum is even harder to stop.
88%
Flag icon
Peter Thiel’s claim that destroying Gawker was “one of the most philanthropic” things he has ever done
88%
Flag icon
What would the world look like if more people tried to change things, conspired to change things they found unjust, unfair, immoral?
« Prev 1 2 Next »