Conspiracy: Peter Thiel, Hulk Hogan, Gawker, and the Anatomy of Intrigue
Rate it:
Open Preview
87%
Flag icon
from time to time in life, we
87%
Flag icon
might have to take someone out behind the woodshed.
87%
Flag icon
How we have lost this. How squeamish we have become. We now blindly demonize what is often one of the most effective forms of action. How vulnerable this ignorance has made us to the few real conspiracies, successful or not, that exist in the world. In this rare occasion, though, we got a glimpse, a peek behind the ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
87%
Flag icon
And yet our instinct is to turn away, to put our fin...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
87%
Flag icon
There is no question that
87%
Flag icon
what Thiel did over those years was brilliant, cunning, and ruthless. It is equally true that Gawker mostly beat itself.
87%
Flag icon
Regardless of any personal opinions I might have, that was the tragic and absurd message of this book. We live in a world where only people like Peter Thiel can pull something so intentional and long-term off—and it’s not because, as Gawker has tried to make it seem, he’s rich. It’s because he’s one of the few who
87%
Flag icon
believes it can be done.
87%
Flag icon
To borrow a line from Zero to One, to believe in conspiracies is an effective truth. To dismiss anyth...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
88%
Flag icon
Would that change how you saw this? Would it change how I saw it?
88%
Flag icon
Still, it became clear to me that a referendum on the merits of a specific conspiracy would be somewhat pointless. To paraphrase the great Margaret Atwood’s line,
88%
Flag icon
I decided not to make a final statement but chose instead to deal in tactics. I rounded no rough edges and I’ll leave it to other experts to sort
88%
Flag icon
through exactly what the implications of ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
88%
Flag icon
Still, I suspect if Thiel’s victory is truly unjust and contrary to what people wan...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
88%
Flag icon
what is indisputable is that he saw his actions as a kind of social good and there is something to be admired in that. He felt the world would be better if freed of a certain menace and he set out to change it, he conspired to change it, well within the letter and the spirit of the law.
88%
Flag icon
The world would have probably benefited more had someone as brilliant as Peter spent his time on more productive projects.
88%
Flag icon
But that’s not really a reason to have not done something here, to have tolerated the status quo
88%
Flag icon
What would the world look like if more people tried to change things, conspired to change things they ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
88%
Flag icon
Was the founding of America not a kind ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
89%
Flag icon
When it comes to conspiracies, there are good ones and terrible ones and
89%
Flag icon
complicated ones. As I said in the introduction, the word is neutral, the application is not.
89%
Flag icon
If you want to have a different world, it is on you to make it so. It will not be easy to do it—it may even require things that you are reluctant to consider. It always has. Moreover, that is your obligation if you are called to a higher task. To do what it takes, to see it through.
1 9 11 Next »