Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life (Incerto, #5)
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
40%
Flag icon
People whose survival depends on qualitative “job assessments” by someone of higher rank in an organization cannot be trusted for critical decisions.
45%
Flag icon
People can detect the difference between front- and back-office operators.
46%
Flag icon
action without talk supersedes talk without action.
47%
Flag icon
Bildungsphilisters—educated philistines.
47%
Flag icon
sophistry.
49%
Flag icon
Consider that about 10 percent of Americans will spend at least a year in the top 1 percent, and more than half of all Americans will spend a year in the top 10 percent.*3 This is visibly not the same for the more static—but nominally more equal—Europe. For instance, only 10 percent of the wealthiest five hundred American people or dynasties were so thirty years ago; more than 60 percent on the French list are heirs and a third of the richest Europeans were the richest centuries ago. In Florence, it was just revealed that things are even worse: the same handful of families have kept the wealth ...more
51%
Flag icon
Traders, when they make profits, have short communications; when they lose they drown you in details, theories, and charts.
54%
Flag icon
Effectively Lindy answers the age-old meta-questions: Who will judge the expert? Who will guard the guard? (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?) Who will judge the judges? Well, survival will. For time operates through skin in the game. Things that have survived are hinting to us ex post that they have some robustness—conditional on their being exposed to harm. For without skin in the game, via exposure to reality, the mechanism of fragility is disrupted: things may survive for no reason for a while, at some scale, then ultimately collapse, causing a lot of collateral harm.
55%
Flag icon
Academia has a tendency, when unchecked (from lack of skin in the game), to evolve into a ritualistic self-referential publishing game.
57%
Flag icon
Nietzsche: Madness is rare in individuals, but in groups, parties, nations, it is the rule.
60%
Flag icon
Never hire an academic unless his function is to partake of the rituals of writing papers or taking exams.
62%
Flag icon
Simply, the minute one is judged by others rather than by reality, things become warped as follows.
70%
Flag icon
It is much more immoral to claim virtue without fully living with its direct consequences.
74%
Flag icon
Silent evidence should be the driver. Reading a history book, without putting its events in perspective, offers a similar bias to reading an account of life in New York seen from an emergency room at Bellevue Hospital.
75%
Flag icon
mathematicians think in (well, precisely defined and mapped) objects and relations, jurists and legal thinkers in constructs, logicians in maximally abstract operators, and…fools in words.
76%
Flag icon
we libertarians share a minimal set of beliefs, the central one being to substitute the rule of law for the rule of authority.
« Prev 1 2 Next »