Competing on Analytics: Updated, with a New Introduction: The New Science of Winning
Rate it:
Open Preview
12%
Flag icon
fivethirtyeight.com website,
14%
Flag icon
What does it mean to compete on analytics? We define an analytical competitor as an organization that uses analytics extensively and systematically to outthink and outexecute the competition.
14%
Flag icon
Among the firms we studied, we found that the most analytically sophisticated and successful had four common key characteristics: (1) analytics supported a strategic, distinctive capability; (2) the approach to and management of analytics
14%
Flag icon
was enterprise-wide; (3) senior management was committed to the use of analytics; and (4) the company made a significant strategic bet on analytics-based competition.
14%
Flag icon
Targets: Organizations can’t be equally analytical about all aspects of their businesses, so they need to target specific business capabilities and functions for the extensive use of analytics.
14%
Flag icon
Analysts: Analytical organizations succeed in part because they hire and train high-quality quantitative analysts and data scientists.
16%
Flag icon
An increasingly common approach to enterprise-level analytics is to establish a chief data and analytics officer (alternatively called a chief data officer or chief analytics officer). The CDAO is a senior executive (often reporting directly to the COO, CMO, or CIO) While this is a relatively new role, Gartner estimates that there are over a thousand CDAOs today; it expects 90 percent of the world’s largest organizations will have one by 2019.
16%
Flag icon
Job descriptions vary, but the CDAO is usually responsible for ensuring that the organization has the data, capabilities (human, financial, technical, and operational) and mindset needed to successfully leverage big data and analytics for competitive advantage.
16%
Flag icon
establishing strategic policies regarding data governance (including data policies and cybersecurity), determining investment priorities to enhance analytical capabilities, developing analytical talent, and building enterprise-wide analytic capabilities.
16%
Flag icon
Charles Thomas, the chief data officer at Wells Fargo, says his team’s “main purpose is to champion the enterprise’s use of insight and action to drive business strategy, reduce risk, optimize performance, and increase value for Wells Fargo’s...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
16%
Flag icon
The CDAO may also head an “analytics hub,” an enterprise-wide, deeply skilled, multidisciplinary team (analysts, data scientists, IT specialists, and data visualization experts) who tackle the most difficult and strategic challenges and opportunities on behalf of the organization.
17%
Flag icon
information-based strategy.”
17%
Flag icon
“In God we trust; all others bring data”
17%
Flag icon
“Do we think, or do ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
17%
Flag icon
Anyone presenting ideas for initiatives or strategies is pressed for...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
17%
Flag icon
Barclays’s consumer finance organization, for example, had a “five-year plan” to build the unit’s capabilities for analytical competition.
17%
Flag icon
New people with quantitative analysis skills had to be hired, and new systems had to be built. Given all these activities, it’s no surprise that it took five years to put the information-based customer strategy in place.
18%
Flag icon
“yield management” at
Joshua  G Steger
Leprino y&e -- project northstar
18%
Flag icon
analytical competitors we’ve studied tend to be relatively high performers.
18%
Flag icon
18%
Flag icon
18%
Flag icon
19%
Flag icon
Analytics or information was not mentioned as one of the firm’s strategic competencies.
19%
Flag icon
The IIA benchmarking suggests that this is the largest group.
19%
Flag icon
By no means have analytics transformed the way these organizations do business. Marketing, for example, may be identifying optimal customers or modeling demand, but the company still markets to all customers and creates supply independent of the demand models. Their analytical activities produce economic benefits but not enough to affect the company’s competitive strategy. What they primarily lack is any vision of analytical competition from senior executives. Several of the firms have some of the same technology as firms at higher stages of analytical activity, but they have not put it to ...more
20%
Flag icon
They can’t connect demand and supply information, so they can’t optimize their supply chains.
20%
Flag icon
They can’t understand the relationship between their nonfinancial performance indicators and their financial results.
21%
Flag icon
links in greater detail and describe how several highly successful companies have transformed their ability to compete on analytics into a key point of differentiation and lasting competitive advantage.
22%
Flag icon
After conducting a statistical analysis of the data, we found a significant correlation between higher levels of analytical maturity and robust five-year compound annual growth rates.12
22%
Flag icon
Once a firm has established a solid foundation of high-quality transaction data,
22%
Flag icon
its managers are able to shift their focus to using the data and systems for better decision making.
22%
Flag icon
In fact, one of the strongest and most consistent differences between low- and high-performance businesses is their attitude toward, and applications of, analytics
22%
Flag icon
Only 8 percent of low performers valued analytical insights to a very large extent compared with 36 percent of top performers. And while one-third of the low performers in our study believe that they have above-average analytical capability within their industries, 77 percent of top performers believe that. Finally, 40 percent of high performers employ analytics broadly across their entire organization, but only 23 percent of low performers do.
22%
Flag icon
They concluded that “top-performing organizations use analytics five times more than lower performers.
23%
Flag icon
High performers are three times as likely to invest a substantial portion of their technology spend on analytics. In addition, more than twice as many high performers are spending more on investments in analytical human capital through training, investments in people and the use of consultants.
23%
Flag icon
Regardless of the approach, for companies to sustain a competitive advantage, analytics must be applied judiciously, executed well, and continually renewed. Companies that successfully compete on analytics have analytical capabilities that are:
23%
Flag icon
Hard to duplicate.
23%
Flag icon
Unique.
23%
Flag icon
Capable of adapting to many situations.
23%
Flag icon
Better than the competition.
23%
Flag icon
The company’s managers refer to the concept of deaveraging—how can they break apart a category or a metric to get more analytical advantage?
23%
Flag icon
Renewable.
23%
Flag icon
By the time competitors
23%
Flag icon
notice that Progressive has targeted a new segment—such as older motorcycle drivers—it has captured the market and moved on to the next opportunity.
27%
Flag icon
Finance groups, naturally, have long used reports, dashboards and scorecards, and online queries in the course of their work. The problem is that these descriptive analytics applications don’t tell the user anything about underlying patterns in the numbers, and they only describe the past. Finance professionals may experiment with an occasional regression model in Excel, but for the finance function to make advanced analytics a core capability—on the same level as external reporting or the closing process—is quite rare.
27%
Flag icon
Intel started several specific initiatives in the forecasting area, including statistical forecasts of revenue and inventory levels, and prediction of impairments in Intel Capital’s investments.
28%
Flag icon
Over the past decade or so, the biggest advance in management reporting has been the shift from IT delivering structured reports or fairly static scorecards to giving managers unprecedented access to enterprise data.
35%
Flag icon
“We compete on analytics and culture,”
35%
Flag icon
Companies increasingly have the ability to relate their investments in human capital to their returns on financial capital.
36%
Flag icon
There are varying approaches to quantitative HR, including 360-degree evaluations, forced rankings, predictions about attrition, and so forth.