Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
25%
Flag icon
Ely said, “no longer permits the science to be used as a tool in the hands of the greedy and the avaricious for keeping down and oppressing the laboring classes.” No one who claimed the mantle of science should advocate “doing nothing while people starve.”
25%
Flag icon
wide use on the right today. They depicted as “rent-seeking” any collective efforts by citizens or public servants to prompt government action that involved tax revenues.
25%
Flag icon
projecting unseemly motives onto strangers about whom they knew nothing.
25%
Flag icon
simply presented his own biases about how the world works to discredit those he opposed.
25%
Flag icon
seeking to make personal hay.
25%
Flag icon
only the federal government had the power to end the long train of damaging injustices shielded by undemocratic state governments.
25%
Flag icon
“the long-smoldering internal campaign of slander, malicious gossip and vilification”
Kurt
Redirecting guilt.
28%
Flag icon
“conspiratorial secrecy is at all times essential.”
30%
Flag icon
it seems hard to imagine why a man who had so much would become consumed with a need to take down those who just wanted “some more” for themselves
33%
Flag icon
modern man has become incapable of making the choices that are required to prevent his
33%
Flag icon
exploitation by predators of his own species,
35%
Flag icon
was Buchanan’s own understanding of his fellow humans and their relations in society that was truly predatory.
35%
Flag icon
domination of the wealthiest and most powerful over all others appeared the ultimate desideratum, a state of affairs to be enabled by his understanding of the ideal constitution.
35%
Flag icon
What poor man in his right mind would ever consent to rules that would keep him poor?
35%
Flag icon
“Despotism may be the only organizational alternative to the political structure that we observe.”
35%
Flag icon
democracy was inimical to economic liberty.
36%
Flag icon
social and political “regression for the majorities and ‘economic freedom’ for small privileged groups” went together.
36%
Flag icon
rewrite the nation’s constitution to forever insulate the interests of the propertied class they represented from the reach of a classic democratic majority.
36%
Flag icon
capitalist class would be all but permanently entrenched in power.
36%
Flag icon
privatization, deregulation, and the state-induced fragmentation of group power.
36%
Flag icon
federal government (“depoliticizing” economic matters,
Kurt
Libertarians object to being told what to do, which is oppression. Their liberty is the right to tell everyone else what to do.
36%
Flag icon
forced to act solely as individuals.
36%
Flag icon
limited the government’s role in safeguarding citizens’ well-being.
36%
Flag icon
education, health care, and social insurance, once provided by the state, ceased to be entitlements of citizens.
Kurt
Add to nationalization the functions of insurance, banking, transportation, and utilities. After nationalization these functions are contracted out to private nonprofits. Contract terms are limited and audited by firms also under contract.
36%
Flag icon
mass purge of teachers
36%
Flag icon
prohibition on political activity
36%
Flag icon
expunge a “half century of errors” when “public opinion was very much against [us].”
36%
Flag icon
new constitution that would make public dissatisfaction irrelevant—or at least sharply curtail the public’s ability to reverse the transformation
36%
Flag icon
“new Constitution which will define our future republican life.”
Kurt
Code word for Communist.
37%
Flag icon
defined public choice as a “science” (even though he, of all people, knew that there was no empirical research
37%
Flag icon
constitutional ways in which we can limit government intervention in the economy
37%
Flag icon
the government should be denied the authority to make “monetary policy because doing so would surely lead to inflation.”
37%
Flag icon
“2/3 or 5/6 of the legislative body, can approve each new expense.”
37%
Flag icon
guaranteed the power of the armed forces over government in the near term, and over the long term curtailed the group influence of nonelite citizens.
37%
Flag icon
approach to binding popular self-government was that he did it with detailed rules
37%
Flag icon
In the boring fine print, he understood, transformations can be achieved by increments that few will notice,
37%
Flag icon
enable unelected military officials to serve as a power brake on the elected members of the congress.
37%
Flag icon
permanently overrepresent the right-wing minority party
37%
Flag icon
forbade union leaders from belonging to political parties
37%
Flag icon
barred advocating “class conflict” or “attack[ing] the family.” Anyone deemed “antifamily” or “Marxist” could be sent into exile, without access to an appeal process.
37%
Flag icon
the plebiscite and counting the votes owed their jobs to the dictatorship.
37%
Flag icon
always, a particular type of freedom the libertarians cared most about.
37%
Flag icon
body radically skewed by the overrepresentation of the wealthy, the military,
37%
Flag icon
Perhaps his conscience troubled him or he feared condemnation.
37%
Flag icon
As they set about devising binding rules to limit what other political agents could do, would he have seen that they might be using the rule-writing process to keep themselves in power?
37%
Flag icon
naked interest-driven action, bereft of any classical liberal principle.
37%
Flag icon
Pinochet—having done away with independent media, freedom of speech, political parties, and so many regulations—could easily purloin public monies to enrich
38%
Flag icon
established, under false names and with the collaboration of leading banks, 125 separate accounts in seven countries to stash what became an illicit fortune
38%
Flag icon
valued economic liberty so much more than political freedom that he simply did not care about the invitation to abuse inherent in giving nearly unchecked power to an alliance of capital and the armed forces.
38%
Flag icon
broad-based opposition emerged among workers, students, and homemakers