Salt Sugar Fat: How the Food Giants Hooked Us
Rate it:
Open Preview
1%
Flag icon
“stomach share,” or the amount of digestive space that any one company’s brand can grab from the competition.
1%
Flag icon
salt, which was processed in dozens of ways to maximize the jolt that taste buds would feel with the very first bite;
1%
Flag icon
fats, which delivered the biggest loads of calories and worked more subtly in inducing people to overeat;
1%
Flag icon
sugar, whose raw power in exciting the brain made it perhaps the most formidable ingredient of all, dictating the formulations of products from on...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
2%
Flag icon
“The transition of food to being an industrial product really has been a fundamental problem,”
2%
Flag icon
“First, the actual processing has stripped away the nutritional value of the food. Most of the grains have been converted to starches. We have sugar in concentrated form, and many of the fats have been concentrated and then, worst of all, hydrogenated, which creates trans-fatty acids with very adverse effects on health.”
2%
Flag icon
“As a culture, we’ve become upset by the tobacco companies advertising to children, but we sit idly by while the food companies do the very same thing. And we could make a claim that the toll taken on the public health by a poor diet rivals that taken by tobacco.”
4%
Flag icon
“bliss point,” or the precise amount of sugar or fat or salt that will send consumers over the moon.
4%
Flag icon
the ideal snack to a mathematical equation of taste and convenience—“P = A1T + A2C + A3U – B1$ – B2H – B3Q,” with the P standing for Purchase and the allure of fat and salt easily overcoming the H, or the public’s health concerns.
4%
Flag icon
Scientists at Nestlé are currently fiddling with the distribution and shape of fat globules to affect their absorption rate and, as it’s known in the industry, their “mouthfeel.”
4%
Flag icon
scientists are altering the physical shape of salt, pulverizing it into a fine powder to hit the taste buds faster and harder, improving what the company calls its “flavor burst.”
4%
Flag icon
The sweetest component of simple sugar, fructose, has been crystallized into an additive that...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
4%
Flag icon
Scientists have also created enhancers that amplify the sweetness of sugar to two hundred ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
4%
Flag icon
Some of the largest companies are now using brain scans to study how we react neurologically to certain foods, especially to sugar. They’ve discovered that the brain lights up for sugar the same way it does for cocaine, and this knowledge is useful, not only in formulating foods.
6%
Flag icon
the sweet taste receptors on the tongue get aroused by endocannabinoids—substances that are produced in the brain to increase our appetite. They are chemical sisters to THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, which may explain why smoking marijuana can trigger hunger pangs.
7%
Flag icon
“moreishness,” in which the early moments of eating—as in appetizers—were shown to be valuable in the pursuit of pleasure by actually making you hungrier still.
8%
Flag icon
We don’t even have to eat sugar to feel its allure. Pizza will do, or any other refined starch, which the body converts to sugar—starting right in the mouth, with an enzyme called amylase.
8%
Flag icon
“The faster the starch becomes sugar, the quicker our brain gets the reward for it,”
8%
Flag icon
It’s sort of like if you drink alcohol really fast, you get drunk really fast. When you break down sugar really fast your body gets flooded with sugar more than it can handle, whereas with a whole grain it is more gradual and you can digest it in a more orderly fashion.”
9%
Flag icon
With regular soda, both sexes gained weight: an average of nearly a pound and a half in just three weeks. At that rate, a person would put on 26 pounds in a year.
11%
Flag icon
Grocery products have lots of attributes that make them attractive, chief among them color, smell, packaging, and taste. In the craft called optimization, food engineers alter these variables ever so slightly in making dozens and dozens of new versions, each just a bit different from the next. These are not new products to sell. They are created with the sole intent of finding the most perfect variation, which is divined by putting all these experimental versions to the test.
12%
Flag icon
“They liked flavorful foods like turkey tetrazzini, but only at first; they quickly grew tired of them. On the other hand, mundane foods like white bread would never get them too excited, but they could eat lots and lots of it without feeling they’d had enough.”
12%
Flag icon
This contradiction would come to be known as “sensory-specific satiety.”
12%
Flag icon
the tendency for big distinct flavors to overwhelm the brain, which responds by making you feel fu...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
12%
Flag icon
With the resulting data he created graphs that, he noticed, looked like an inverted U. They showed that our liking of food rose as the amount of sugar was increased, but only to a point; after that peak, adding more sugar was not only a waste, it diminished the allure of the food.
13%
Flag icon
hunger is a poor driver of cravings.
13%
Flag icon
We rarely get in the situation where our body and brain are depleted of nutrients and are actually in need of replenishment. Rather, he discovered, we are driven to eat by other forces in our lives.
13%
Flag icon
Some of these are emotional needs, while others reflect the pillars of processed food: first and foremost taste, followed...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
13%
Flag icon
As disparate as these pillars may seem, one ingredient—su...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
14%
Flag icon
the powerful sensory force that food scientists call “mouthfeel.” This is the way a product interacts with the mouth,
16%
Flag icon
the physician who had invented the cereal flake, John Harvey Kellogg, was quite a stickler on sweets, running his cereal company from a sanitarium where he banned sugar altogether.
16%
Flag icon
With financial backing from Goldman Sachs, General Foods began to acquire a string of the most popular processed foods in America: Jell-O, Kool-Aid, Log Cabin Syrup, the whole retinue of Oscar Mayer processed meats, Entenmann’s baked sweets, Hellmann’s mayo, Maxwell House coffee, Birdseye frozen foods, and Minute Tapioca, the sweet pudding that gave rise to Minute Rice, the parboiled phenomenon.
16%
Flag icon
By 1985, when General Foods was purchased by Philip Morris, it had grown from an $18 million startup to a $9 billion industry leader. It had 56,000 employees, a research budget of $113 million, and hefty market shares in powdered soft drinks, cereals, coffee, lunch meats, hot dogs, and bacon.
17%
Flag icon
“Today, consumer expectations are so high and the pace at which new products are introduced is so fast that Mrs. Homemaker usually can’t say what it is she really wants—until after some enterprising company creates it and she finds it in a retail store,
17%
Flag icon
He figured out that adding sugar to the chow would keep the bacteria away even in moist conditions, as sugar acted like a binder to make the water inaccessible to the bacteria.
17%
Flag icon
The idea of using sugar to ward off bacteria is now embedded in the production of many processed foods,
19%
Flag icon
“Americanitis”—or the bloated, gaseous stomachache caused by the ailment otherwise known as dyspepsia.
20%
Flag icon
health concerns arose over one of their pillar ingredients—salt, sugar, or fat—the solution of choice for the food manufacturers was the simplest: Just swap out the problem component for another that wasn’t, at the moment, as high on the list of concerns.
20%
Flag icon
the fat-laden breakfast plate of the nineteenth century, vilified for upsetting the national stomach, was largely replaced by the sugary cereal bowl of the twentieth century,
21%
Flag icon
obesity, which he called a “disease of civilization.”
21%
Flag icon
desire to eat is controlled by the amount of glucose in the blood and by the brain’s hypothalamus, both of which in turn are greatly influenced by sugar.
22%
Flag icon
food manufacturers now spend nearly twice as much money on advertising their cereals as they do on the ingredients that go into them.
22%
Flag icon
Small children were so gullible, it said, that they couldn’t help but view commercials as informational programming. Not only that, they were unable to comprehend “the influence which television advertising exerts over them”—
22%
Flag icon
There were 3,832 ads for mostly sugary cereals, 1,627 for candy and gum, 841 for cookies and crackers, 582 for fruit drinks, and 184 for cakes, pies, and other desserts. The total number of ads for unsweetened foods, like meat, or fish, or vegetable juice, on the other hand? Four.
22%
Flag icon
Kellogg memo that summed up the bottom line on children’s advertising quite succinctly: “Television advertising of ready-to-eat cereals to children,” the memo said, “increases children’s consumption of these products.”
28%
Flag icon
“sensory-specific satiety,” or the power of one overwhelming flavor to trigger the feeling of fullness,
30%
Flag icon
“Sixty percent of supermarket purchase decisions are completely unplanned,”