More on this book
Community
Kindle Notes & Highlights
it’s smarter and ultimately better for you to be open-minded and have faith that the consensus of believable others is better than whatever you think.
Dalai Lama’s book, Beyond Religion,
Anything is possible. It’s the probabilities that matter. Everything
(the term “artificial intelligence” was first introduced in 1956 at a conference at Dartmouth College).
the value of a widely known insight disappears over time.
it was when the number of people at Bridgewater passed sixty-seven. Up until then, I had personally chosen each employee’s holiday gift and written them a lengthy personalized card, but trying to do it that year broke my back.
many opinions are bad and virtually everyone is confident that theirs are good,
As Winston Churchill said, “There is no worse course in leadership than to hold out false hopes soon to be swept away.”
build an error log (we now call it the Issue Log), in which traders recorded all their mistakes and bad outcomes so we could track them and address them
Get over “blame” and “credit” and get on with “accurate” and “inaccurate.” Worrying about “blame” and “credit” or “positive” and “negative” feedback impedes the iterative process that is essential to learning. Remember that what has already happened lies in the past and no longer matters except as a lesson for the future. The need for phony praise needs to be unlearned.
Tauno liked this
is never acceptable to get upset if the idea meritocracy doesn’t produce the decision that you personally wanted.
The two-minute rule specifies that you have to give someone an uninterrupted two minutes to explain their thinking before jumping in with your own.
Tauno and 1 other person liked this
Having a hierarchy of merit is not only consistent with an idea meritocracy but essential for it. It’s simply not possible for everyone to debate everything all the time and still get their work done.
This phenomenon is called the narcissism of small differences. Take the Protestants and Catholics. Though both are followers of Christ, some of them have been fighting for hundreds of years, even though many of them are unable to articulate the differences that divide them,
Kaido Koort liked this
long as you bear the consequences of failure, you are the ultimate Responsible Party. For example, while you might choose to delegate the responsibility of figuring out how to handle your illness to a doctor, it is your responsibility to pick the right one, since you will bear the consequences if he does a bad job.
Remember that people tend to pick people like themselves, so choose interviewers who can identify what you are looking for.
You don’t want people to accept a job for the security of making a lot more money—you want them to come for the opportunity to earn it through hard and creative work.
the only purpose of money is to get you what you want, so think hard about what you value and put it above money.
Tauno and 1 other person liked this
If you ask everybody in an organization what percentage of the organization’s success they’re personally responsible for, you’ll wind up with a total of about 300 percent.
a great manager is essentially an organizational engineer.
the higher up you are in an organization, the more important vision and creativity become, but you still must have the skills required to manage/orchestrate well.
Remember that for every case you deal with, your approach should have two purposes . . . . . . 1) to move you closer to your goal, and 2) to train and test your machine (i.e., your people and your design). The
Kaido Koort liked this
there’s danger in thinking you’re delegating details when you’re actually being too distant from what’s important and essentially are not managing.
Job slip is when a job changes without being explicitly thought through and agreed to, generally because of changing circumstances or a temporary necessity. Job slip often leads to the wrong people handling the wrong responsibilities and confusion over who is supposed to do what.
If you ask a high-level question like “How is goal XYZ going?” a good answer will provide a synthesis up-front of how XYZ is going overall and, if needed, will support it by accounting for the tasks that were done to achieve it. People who see the tasks and lose sight of the goals will just describe the tasks that were done.
Tauno liked this
An organization is the opposite of a building: Its foundation is at the top, so make sure you hire managers before you hire their reports.
Double-checking has a much higher rate of errors than double-doing, which is having two different people do the same task so that they produce two independent answers.
Kaido Koort liked this
a position is part-time and requires highly specialized knowledge, I would prefer to have it done by consultants or outsiders.
I typically work at about 50:1 leverage, meaning that for every hour I spend with each person who works for me, they spend about fifty hours working to move the project along. At
Kaido Koort and 1 other person liked this
there’s a big difference between wanting to do something and actually being able to do it. Assuming people will do what they intellectually want to do is like assuming that people will lose weight simply because they understand why it’s beneficial for them to do

