If this wide range of precise experiences is all collapsed into the generic word “violence,” then nothing has any differentiation, therefore all the variations lose meaning.
I think there should also be more consideration of to what extent those variations give/enable meaning and to what extent they are necessary v. getting in the way -- for example, a discussion of campus sexual assault is going to be different from a discussion of racial inequality/discrimination on campus but I think once you're at the point of talking about either specifically, you're already at a depth that nothing has been collapsed and there's no confusion about the type of violence under consideration (i.e. the variations don't simply derive meaning from their labels but from a whole host of other factors)
