More on this book
Community
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Chief Justice John Marshall.
attack ideas. I don’t attack people. Some very good people have some very bad ideas. And if you can’t separate the two, you gotta get another day job.
And people need protection Against the vile infection 40 Of rank discrimination in the form of racial caste,41 Which looks like it could last Unless we end it fast.
And saying that our future’ll Be suddenly “race-neutral” Is acting like an ostrich with its head stuck in the sand— Because it cannot stand To see what plagues our land.42
What hubris! what hubris!
For the law of the land in that era was grounded In the notion that justice was just for the few,
So we’re freeing the people we used to hold captive,50 Who deserve to be more than just servants or wives.51 If we hadn’t been willing to be so adaptive, Can you honestly say we’d have led better 52 lives?
Not until We the People and our Constitution are living 53 In a nation, in a place That, regardless of station or race, Is a nation where all of us truly belong!
So, until every person is treated as equal Well beyond what the Founders initially saw, Let our past and our present be merely the prequel To a future enlightened by flexible law!
SCALIA, GINSBURG (cont’d): We are different. We are one. The U.S. contradiction—
Always one decision from charting the course we will steer . . .65 For our future Is unclear, But one thing is constant— The Constitution we revere.66 We are stewards of this trust; 67 We uphold it as we must, For the work of our Court is just Begun . . . And this is why we will see justice done: We are different; We are one.
Congress sometimes is more in tune with changing times than the Court is.
Not intimidated by slights and detractors, to the end of her life in 1917, she remained an unflappable optimist.
Even so, there is a need for women of Lockwood’s sense and steel to guard against backsliding, and to ensure that our daughters and granddaughters can aspire and achieve, with no artificial barriers blocking their way.
“[h]owever desperate his case, Benjamin habitually addressed the court as if it were impossible for him to lose.”
Brandeis elaborated the canons of judicial restraint more powerfully than any other jurist, cautioning judges to be ever on guard against “erect[ing] our prejudices into legal principles.”
the final end of the State was to make men free to develop their faculties;
the deliberative forces should prevail over the arbitrary. They valued liberty both as an end and as a means.
They believed liberty to be the secret of happiness and courage to be ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
What is the difference between a New York City garment district bookkeeper and a Supreme Court Justice? One generation my life bears witness, the difference between opportunities open to my mother, a bookkeeper, and those open to me.
When my father died, my mother would not permit others to take her daughters’ place in saying the Kaddish, and so I am sure I am acting in her spirit when I am moved to decline your offer. But beautiful your offer remains nevertheless, and, I repeat, I know full well that it is much more in consonance with the generally accepted Jewish tradition than is my or my family’s conception. You understand me, don’t you?
Once fully recovered, she spoke of that trying time; her account, carried on public television, gave women battling cancer hope, the courage to continue, to do as she did. She went back to the 8:00 a.m. exercise class she initiated at the Court long before it was predicted she could. “[T]here was a lot I couldn’t do,” she said, “[b]ut I did a little, I did what I could.”5
During oral argument, many a distinguished counsel—including a Harvard Law School professor and more than one solicitor general—began his response to my question: “Well, Justice O’Connor . . .” Sometimes when that happened, Sandra would smile and crisply remind counsel: “She’s Justice Ginsburg. I’m Justice O’Connor.”
success. She sought to be helpmate to, not independent from, John Marshall
“Change is the law of life, and the judiciary will have to change to meet the challenges we will face in the future.”72 Changes are in store for the Court in the Term about to start. But I anticipate that they will be eased by the way the Justices and their partners—at work and in life—relate to, care about, and respect each other.
115-year-old practice of catering only to men.

