Infomocracy (Centenal Cycle #1)
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Read between September 22 - September 24, 2024
18%
Flag icon
watching television (the opiate of choice at the time)
18%
Flag icon
“When you watch TV, do you ever feel guilty about wasting your life?” a question that probably had far more effect than an admonition would have.
19%
Flag icon
That did not work out so well. The new Heritage coalition of wealthy, experienced global corporates ignored the accessibility of Information, produced their standard glossy misinformation, and not only took the Supermajority but won centenals where, analysts agreed, it was demonstrably not in the interests of the people living there to vote for them.
19%
Flag icon
There was a study done with minimally educated voters who, given a hypothetical ballot, picked the names of famous serial killers over randomly generated names as well as over those of actual, less well-known politicians. Most of the discussion among the Information workers was about how to increase the name recognition of the politicians
73%
Flag icon
“Why do people always expect you to trust them? With all the shit that goes on in this world, I don’t know why anyone expects my trust just because they are unverifiably, according to themselves, a nice guy. Who the hell defaults to trust?”
94%
Flag icon
narrative disorder
Tim Moore
a tendency to read imaginary sequences into a situation.
94%
Flag icon
Frustrated with the impossibility of getting people to make informed choices, stymied by the name-recognition problem and the celebrity factor and a million other quirks of neurobiology, the people who cared decided to manipulate the people who didn’t.
94%
Flag icon
narrative cohesion, for character motivations, for verisimilitude.
96%
Flag icon
despite all the Information available, people tend to look at what they want to see.