Team of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex World
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between September 3 - September 13, 2022
25%
Flag icon
As Zolli puts it, “if we cannot control the volatile tides of change, we can learn to build better boats.”
25%
Flag icon
Peter Drucker had a catchy statement: “Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right thing.”
28%
Flag icon
Anyone who has ever played or watched sports knows that instinctive, cooperative adaptability is essential to high-performing teams.
32%
Flag icon
Their structure—not their plan—was their strategy.
33%
Flag icon
The creation and maintenance of a team requires both the visible hand of management and the invisible hand of emergence,
33%
Flag icon
The crew’s attachment to procedure instead of purpose offers a clear example of the dangers of prizing efficiency over adaptability.
36%
Flag icon
“mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive.”
38%
Flag icon
adaptive small teams operating within an old-fashioned rigid superstructure.
39%
Flag icon
Robin Dunbar theorized that the number of people an individual can actually trust usually falls between 100 and 230
42%
Flag icon
require completely rethinking the conventional organizational approach to distributing information.
44%
Flag icon
NASA would have to link its teams together by disregarding the “need to know” paradigm and widely broadcasting information.
46%
Flag icon
making sure that everyone has constantly updated, holistic awareness
46%
Flag icon
“taking individual performance out of the lexicon on day one.”
47%
Flag icon
transparency
47%
Flag icon
demanded a disciplined effort to create shared consciousness.
49%
Flag icon
“Share information until you’re afraid it’s illegal.”
52%
Flag icon
Shared consciousness in an organization is either hindered or helped by physical spaces and established processes.
60%
Flag icon
engagement was the central predictor of productivity, exceeding individual intelligence, personality, and skill.
61%
Flag icon
Drucker’s exhortation to “do the right thing” rather than “do things right”:
63%
Flag icon
“Perry Principle.”
64%
Flag icon
Our One Rule: Use good judgment in all situations.
65%
Flag icon
every Captain was a Nelson.” We wanted our force to exhibit
66%
Flag icon
“Eyes On—Hands Off” represented a complete reverse of the Perry Principle: if we could see it, we would not need to try to control it.
67%
Flag icon
new paradigm of personal leadership.
67%
Flag icon
The role of the senior leader was no longer that of controlling puppet master, but rather that of an empathetic crafter of culture.
68%
Flag icon
The gardener creates an environment in which the plants can flourish.
68%
Flag icon
The move-by-move control that seemed natural to military operations proved less effective than nurturing the organization—its structure, processes, and culture—to enable the subordinate components to function with “smart autonomy.”
68%
Flag icon
The gardener cannot actually “grow” tomatoes, squash, or beans—she can only foster an environment in which the plants do so.
68%
Flag icon
As a leader, however, my most powerful instrument of communication was my own behavior.
69%
Flag icon
even if the brief had been terrible, I would compliment the report. Others would later offer them advice on how to improve—but it didn’t need to come from me in front of thousands of people.
69%
Flag icon
“Thank you”
69%
Flag icon
Gardeners plant and harvest, but more than anything, they tend.
70%
Flag icon
“dinosaur’s tail”:
73%
Flag icon
An organization should empower its people, but only after it has done the heavy lifting of creating shared consciousness.
73%
Flag icon
Shared consciousness is a carefully maintained set of centralized forums for bringing people together.
73%
Flag icon
Empowered execution is a radically decentralized system for pushing authority out to the edges of the organization.