Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time
Rate it:
Read between October 30, 2019 - February 9, 2021
42%
Flag icon
Plan in just enough detail to deliver the next increment of value, and estimate the remainder of the project in larger chunks.
42%
Flag icon
Scrum, at the end of each iteration you have something of value that you can see, tou...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
42%
Flag icon
And if the answer is no, change your plan.
42%
Flag icon
The first thing to do is create a list of all the things that make up a successful wedding.
42%
Flag icon
Now, the next thing to do is to take all those elements and sort them by priority.
42%
Flag icon
The point of the exercise is to figure out the really important things and work on those first.
42%
Flag icon
This is important data to have, because if you start bumping up against date or cost constraints, you know where to start cutting—at the bottom of the list.
42%
Flag icon
At Medco the list wrapped around three walls of a large conference room and was hundreds of items long with six different teams working on them.
42%
Flag icon
Organize by value,
42%
Flag icon
wha...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
42%
Flag icon
value that may be. It could be business value in the case of Medco, or it could be bride happiness va...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
42%
Flag icon
Size Does Matter, but Only Relatively
42%
Flag icon
another. Picking out the difference between small, medium, and large T-shirts, for example.
42%
Flag icon
“Dog Points.”
42%
Flag icon
Agile thinking,
42%
Flag icon
“dog”
43%
Flag icon
“Okay, this problem—is it a dachshund or a Great Dane? And if that one is a dachshund, this one must be about the size of a Labrador retriever, right?”
43%
Flag icon
“Let’s give each breed a number value; that’ll be easier. Let’s call a dachshund a one and a Great Dane a thirteen. That would make a Lab a five, say, and a bulldog a three.”1
43%
Flag icon
Let’s call it a German shepherd–size problem, a five.
43%
Flag icon
That’s a dachshund, a one, just a phone call.
43%
Flag icon
That’s a Great Dane, a thirteen.
43%
Flag icon
And if something is that big, you should probably cut it down into manageable pieces.
43%
Flag icon
Call that a three.
43%
Flag icon
five.
43%
Flag icon
So that’s relative sizing, comparing tasks ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
43%
Flag icon
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13.
43%
Flag icon
Each number in the series is the sum of the two previous numbers. It’s called the “Fibonacci sequence,”
43%
Flag icon
It is ever...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
43%
Flag icon
The sequence is how nature lays itself out, whether it be in the shell of a nautilus, the branches on a tree, the bumps on a pineapple, or the petals of a pinecone. It shows up in cauliflower and the curves of the human brain.
43%
Flag icon
It’s one of those phenomena that, when you think about it, is pretty freaky.
43%
Flag icon
“Golden Mean”
43%
Flag icon
“Golden Ratio.”
43%
Flag icon
We’ve used it to decide the size and shape of pages in a book and the proportions of playing cards.
43%
Flag icon
For our purposes, all that’s important to know is that our species deeply understands the ratios of the Fibonacci sequence.
43%
Flag icon
But the difference between a five and a six? That’s pretty subtle, more than our brains can really register.
43%
Flag icon
We’re better at perceiving jumps from one state to another—and not smooth jumps but jagged ones.
43%
Flag icon
What using the Fibonacci sequence to calculate task size permits is estimates that don’t have to be 100 percent accurate.
43%
Flag icon
Estimating as a group in this manner gives us a far more accurate estimate than we could come up with alone.
43%
Flag icon
The Oracle of Delphi
43%
Flag icon
Unsurprisingly, this is not a new problem.
43%
Flag icon
“bandwagon”
43%
Flag icon
And when you probe people about the decision, it’s almost always the case that each had some reservations, but they didn’t voice them because they figured everyone else was excited.
43%
Flag icon
Remember, this groupthink isn’t an individual failure; this is a human failure.
43%
Flag icon
“informational cascade.”
44%
Flag icon
“An informational cascade occurs when it is optimal for an individual, having observed the actions of those ahead of him, to follow the
44%
Flag icon
behavior of the preceding individual without regard to his own information.”
44%
Flag icon
People assume other people are making sound judgments, even if those judgments contradict their own.
44%
Flag icon
it’s critical to apply your own judgment, and use other estimates to improve your own, not replace it.
44%
Flag icon
“halo effect.”
44%
Flag icon
This was first empirically studied in 1920 by Edward Lee Thorndike.