Bull!: A History of the Boom and Bust, 1982–2004
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between November 13 - November 16, 2020
61%
Flag icon
skeptical view
61%
Flag icon
Jim Chanos,
61%
Flag icon
E...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
“window dr...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
“Sarbanes-Oxley makes corporate fraud a crime,” Chanos observed, referring to the 2002 legislation that required CEOs to sign off on their company’s financial statements.
61%
Flag icon
Earnings that winked at you were not the only signs of a frothy market.
61%
Flag icon
In December of 2003, one portfolio manager summed up the quality of this new bull market: “If you had told me that the market was going to be led this year by small, low-priced stocks of money-losing companies,”
61%
Flag icon
colu...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
unpert...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
Even as individual investors surged into stocks, insiders headed for the exits: in March of 2004, insiders sold $23.38 of their own stock for every $1 that they bought.
61%
Flag icon
fund managers
61%
Flag icon
“Most money managers are participating in this crazy market, but many do not believe in it,” Fred Hickey, editor of The Hi-Tech Strategist, observed in February.
61%
Flag icon
Younger momentum investors had taken their places, and many were gunslingers. “They’re speculators,” Hickey noted, “with their fingers on the sell triggers.”
61%
Flag icon
THE SHAPE OF THINGS TO COME
61%
Flag icon
From the sidelines, Richard Russell cast a cold eye on the rebound that began in the spring of 2003, warning his readers that the rally was nothing other than a bear market rally—otherwise known as a “sucker” rally: “The sharpest and most explosive rallies occur not in bull markets but in bear markets,” Russell observed.
61%
Flag icon
“As the old-time Dow Theorists were fond of saying, ‘a bear market rally often looks better than the real thing.’ That saying came about,” Russell added, “following the giant b...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
the crash of 1970
61%
Flag icon
January of 1973, the Dow had hit a new high, and Alan Greenspan, then an informal advisor to President Nixon, was among those convinced that the bull was back: “It is very rare that you can be as unqualifiedly bullish as you can be right now,” he declared at the very beginning of the year.14 Within weeks, the crash of 1973-74 began.
61%
Flag icon
This second leg down would prove far more traumatic than the first: when it was all over, the Dow had erased ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
But while history may repeat, it always repeats w...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
Gail Dudack
61%
Flag icon
Steve Leuthold
61%
Flag icon
a new bottom—or a...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
Leu...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
1974
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
1982
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
precrash ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
2004
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
2005,
61%
Flag icon
“Market timers and asset allocators could do pretty well in this type of market,” he added. “But this is not a market for buy-and-hold stock investors.” As Leuthold knew from experience, “buy-and-hold” works only in long “secular” bull markets.
61%
Flag icon
Most individual investors, however, did not distinguish between short, “cyclical” bull markets—which can easily turn into bear traps—and the real McCoy, “secular” bull m...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
As far as most 401(k) investors were concerned, the bull was back, and they did not...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
Leu...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
CDs,
61%
Flag icon
Treasuries
61%
Flag icon
As Leuthold put it, “stocks are the only g...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
61%
Flag icon
CONSUMERS LEAD THE RECOVERY
61%
Flag icon
Conservative investors who wanted to tuck their savings away in a bond and watch it compound complained about rock-bottom rates.
62%
Flag icon
administration’s ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
62%
Flag icon
Only a few weeks before the Fed’s thirteenth cut, President Bush signed legislation to reduce taxes by $350 billion, bringing the administration’s total 10-year tax cut package to a generous $1.7 trillion.
62%
Flag icon
The Greenspan/Bush administration’s plan was to boost demand by putting more cash into consumers’ hands.
62%
Flag icon
Short...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
62%
Flag icon
Consumers were not simply spending their tax refunds; they were spending money that they did not have.
62%
Flag icon
By 2003, U.S. consumers had increased their spending for an unprecedented 47 quarters in a row.
62%
Flag icon
felt wealthier.
62%
Flag icon
2003
62%
Flag icon
2003,
62%
Flag icon
43 trillion—
62%
Flag icon
the spring of 2000.19
62%
Flag icon
In other words, the nation’s shopping spree was driven, not by jobs and rising incomes,
1 7 28