On Photography
Rate it:
Open Preview
Started reading April 25, 2020
1%
Flag icon
Photographs really are experience captured, and the camera is the ideal arm of consciousness in its acquisitive mood. To photograph is to appropriate the thing photographed. It means putting oneself into a certain relation to the world that feels like knowledge—and, therefore, like power.
1%
Flag icon
Photographed images do not seem to be statements about the world so much as pieces of it, miniatures of reality that anyone can make or acquire.
3%
Flag icon
In deciding how a picture should look, in preferring one exposure to another, photographers are always imposing standards on their subjects. Although there is a sense in which the camera does indeed capture reality, not just interpret it, photographs are as much an interpretation of the world as paintings and drawings are.
3%
Flag icon
photography is not practiced by most people as an art. It is mainly a social rite, a defense against anxiety, and a tool of power.
5%
Flag icon
Taking photographs has set up a chronic voyeuristic relation to the world which levels the meaning of all events.
7%
Flag icon
To photograph people is to violate them, by seeing them as they never see themselves, by having knowledge of them they can never have; it turns people into objects that can be symbolically possessed. Just as the camera is a sublimation of the gun, to photograph someone is a sublimated murder—a soft murder, appropriate to a sad, frightened time.
7%
Flag icon
All photographs are memento mori. To take a photograph is to participate in another person’s (or thing’s) mortality, vulnerability, mutability. Precisely by slicing out this moment and freezing it, all photographs testify to time’s relentless melt.
10%
Flag icon
Time eventually positions most photographs, even the most amateurish, at the level of art.