Math, Better Explained: Learn to Unlock Your Math Intuition
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between December 3 - December 19, 2019
1%
Flag icon
Did you know that negative numbers were only created in the 1700s, and were considered absurd? That imaginary numbers had the same fight when introduced?
Paweł Cisło
Interesting math facts
2%
Flag icon
The essays highlight my favorite learning method: get the context of an idea, formulate analogies, and cover examples using those analogies.
Paweł Cisło
Learning method of the book author
2%
Flag icon
If you'd like to receive information about newer editions, errata fixes, and discounts on the video version of the book, you can sign up at: http://betterexplained.com/ebooklist
Paweł Cisło
Newsletter of this e-book
2%
Flag icon
Feel free to adjust the settings; I find the smaller sizes work best. The diagrams are in high-contrast color to balance readability on black & white and color screens.
Paweł Cisło
Ideally read this book in smaller font, and if you want to better understand the diagrams, check out the PDF/online Kindle version
4%
Flag icon
We’re left with arcane formulas (DNA) but little understanding of what the idea is.
Paweł Cisło
Way we're usually taught math with no intuition behind it
5%
Flag icon
The points (x,y) in the equation x2 + y2 = r2 (analytic version of the geometric definition above)
Paweł Cisło
One of the countless definitions of a circle
6%
Flag icon
math is about ideas — formulas are just a way to express them.
6%
Flag icon
Step 1: Find the central theme of a math concept.
Paweł Cisło
When trying to understand math, come to the roots of the problem for understanding its application
6%
Flag icon
Step 2: Explain a property/fact using the theme.
Paweł Cisło
Later, translate formulas into their real meanings
6%
Flag icon
Step 3: Explore related properties using the same theme.
Paweł Cisło
Lastly, Find where else this statement applies
7%
Flag icon
Looking at e’s history, it seems it has something to do with growth or interest rates. e was discovered when performing business calculations (not abstract mathematical conjectures) so “interest” (growth) is a possible theme.
Paweł Cisło
Roots of e
7%
Flag icon
Definition 1: Define e as 100% compound growth at the smallest increment possible
Paweł Cisło
Money makes money, which makes money, which...
8%
Flag icon
by always growing it means you are always calculating interest – it’s another way of describing continuously compound interest!
Paweł Cisło
Continuously compound interest
8%
Flag icon
e is the number where you’re always growing by exactly your current amount (100%), not 1% or 200%.
Paweł Cisło
e
8%
Flag icon
the natural log (ln) as shorthand for this “time to grow” computation.
Paweł Cisło
Natural log(ln)
9%
Flag icon
ln(a) is simply the time to grow from 1 to a.
Paweł Cisło
ln(a)
9%
Flag icon
e is the amount of growth after waiting exactly 1 unit of time!
Paweł Cisło
e
9%
Flag icon
Once we have the core idea (“e is about 100% continuous growth”), the crazy equations snap into place — it’s possible to translate calculus into English. Math is about ideas!
Paweł Cisło
It's possible to translate calculus into English
9%
Flag icon
If it doesn’t click, come at it from different angles. There’s another book, another article, another person who explains it in a way that makes sense to you.
10%
Flag icon
Math becomes difficult and discouraging when we focus on definitions over understanding.
10%
Flag icon
The Pythagorean Theorem can be used with any shape and for any formula that squares a number.
10%
Flag icon
The area of any shape can be computed from any line segment squared
Paweł Cisło
In square it's a side, in circle it's a radius
11%
Flag icon
Area = Factor ·(line segment)2
Paweł Cisło
Universal equation
11%
Flag icon
given area formula works for all similar shapes, where “similar” means “zoomed versions of each other”. For example: All squares are similar (area always s2) All circles are similar,
11%
Flag icon
All triangles are not similar: Some are fat and others skinny – every type of triangle has its own area factor based on the line segment you are using.
Paweł Cisło
Triangles differ
12%
Flag icon
when you zoom (scale) a shape, you’re changing the absolute size but not the relative ratios within the shape.
Paweł Cisło
When zooming
12%
Flag icon
Area can be be found from any line segment squared, not just the side or radius Each line segment has a different “area factor” The same area equation works for similar shapes
Paweł Cisło
Summarising
13%
Flag icon
Any right triangle can be split into two similar right triangles.
15%
Flag icon
Circle of radius 5 = Circle of radius 4 + Circle of radius 3.
15%
Flag icon
The Pythagorean Theorem applies to any equation that has a squared term. The triangle-splitting means you can split any amount (c2) into two smaller amounts (a2 + b2
Paweł Cisło
Universality of the Pythagorean Theorem
15%
Flag icon
Metcalfe’s Law (if you believe it) says the value of a network is about n2 (the number of relationships).
Paweł Cisło
Metcalfe's Law
16%
Flag icon
In terms of processing time: 50 inputs = 40 inputs + 30 inputs Pretty interesting. 70 elements spread among two groups can be sorted as fast as 50 items in one group.
16%
Flag icon
Assuming the boats are similarly shaped, the paint needed to coat one 50 foot yacht could instead paint a 40 and 30-footer. Yowza.
16%
Flag icon
Energy at 500 mph = Energy at 400 mph + Energy at 300 mph With the energy used to accelerate one bullet to 500 mph, we could accelerate two others to 400 and 300 mph.
Paweł Cisło
Kinetic energy = 1/2 mv^2
17%
Flag icon
The Pythagorean Theorem lets you find the shortest path distance between orthogonal directions. So it’s not really about right “triangles” — it’s about comparing “things” moving at right angles.
Paweł Cisło
Pythagorean Theorem - real use
19%
Flag icon
As you can guess, the Pythagorean Theorem generalizes to any number of dimensions.
21%
Flag icon
It appears humans can’t tell the difference between colors only 4 units apart; heck, even a distance of 30 units looks pretty similar to me:
Paweł Cisło
In the system of 255 values
21%
Flag icon
You can even unscramble certain blurred images by cleverly applying color distance.
22%
Flag icon
If you can quantify it, you can compare it using the the Pythagorean Theorem.
Paweł Cisło
Core idea
22%
Flag icon
the Pythagorean Theorem: Works for any shape, not just triangles (like circles) Works for any equation with squares (like ½ mv2) Generalizes to any number of dimensions (a2 + b2 + c2 + ...) Measures any type of distance (i.e. between colors or movie preferences)
Paweł Cisło
Summary of the Pythagorean Theorem
23%
Flag icon
Before numbers and language we had the stars. Ancient civilizations used astronomy to mark the seasons, predict the future, and appease the gods
Paweł Cisło
Before we used stars
23%
Flag icon
isn’t it strange that a circle has 360 degrees and a year has 365 days?.
24%
Flag icon
Constellations make a circle every day. If you look at them the same time every day (midnight), they will make a circle throughout the year.
Paweł Cisło
Constellations as the time measurement
25%
Flag icon
Degrees measure angles by how far we tilted our heads. Radians measure angles by distance traveled.
Paweł Cisło
Degrees & Radians
25%
Flag icon
Radian = distance traveled / radius
Paweł Cisło
Getting a normalised angle
26%
Flag icon
radian is about 360/2π or 57.3 degrees.
26%
Flag icon
Think about it — “Hey Bill, can you run 90 degrees for me? What’s that? Oh, yeah, that’d be π/2 miles from your point of view.” The strangeness goes both ways.
Paweł Cisło
Degrees to radians
26%
Flag icon
Strictly speaking, radians are a ratio (length divided by another length) and don’t have a dimension.
26%
Flag icon
think of radians as “distance traveled on a unit circle”.
28%
Flag icon
With degrees, you’re comparing your height on a circle (sin(x)) with how far some observer tilted their head (x degrees), and it gets ugly fast.
« Prev 1 3 4