Math, Better Explained: Learn to Unlock Your Math Intuition
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between December 3 - December 19, 2019
29%
Flag icon
With natural laws, we’re an observer describing the motion of others. Radians are about them, not us.
29%
Flag icon
Degrees are arbitrary because they’re based on the sun (365 days ~ 360 degrees), but they are backwards because they are from the observer’s perspective.
Paweł Cisło
Degrees
31%
Flag icon
Even Euler, the genius who discovered e and much more, didn’t understand negatives as we do today.
Paweł Cisło
Till 1700 negatives didn't make much sense
33%
Flag icon
i is a “new imaginary dimension” to measure a number i (or -i) is what numbers “become” when rotated Multiplying i is a rotation by 90 degrees counter-clockwise Multiplying by -i is a rotation of 90 degrees clockwise Two rotations in either direction is -1: it brings us back into the “regular” dimensions of positive and negative numbers.
Paweł Cisło
Imaginary numbers
33%
Flag icon
Numbers are 2-dimensional.
35%
Flag icon
Like negative numbers modeling flipping, imaginary numbers can model anything that rotates between two dimensions “X” and “Y”.
35%
Flag icon
complex number is the fancy name for numbers with both real and imaginary parts. They’re written a + bi, where a is the real part b is the imaginary part
Paweł Cisło
Complex number
36%
Flag icon
Size of -x = √(-x)2 = |x|
Paweł Cisło
Size of a negative number
36%
Flag icon
Size of a + bi = √(a2 + b2)
Paweł Cisło
Size of complex numbers
36%
Flag icon
Multiplying by a complex number rotates by its angle
37%
Flag icon
Original heading: 3 units East, 4 units North = 3 + 4i Rotate counter-clockwise by 45 degrees = multiply by 1 + i If we multiply them together we get: (3 + 4i) · (1 + i) = 3 + 4i + 3i + 4i2 = 3−4 + 7i = −1 + 7i So our new orientation is 1 unit West (-1 East), and 7 units North,
Paweł Cisło
Example calculation of complex numbers
38%
Flag icon
complex numbers can make ugly calculations simple (like calculating cosine(a + b)).
39%
Flag icon
Imaginary numbers have an intuitive explanation: they “rotate” numbers, just like negatives make a “mirror image” of a number.
Paweł Cisło
Helpful insight
40%
Flag icon
Complex numbers are similar: they have their real and imaginary parts “contained” in a single variable (shorthand is often Re and Im).
40%
Flag icon
number z = 3 + 4i would have a magnitude of 5. The shorthand for “magnitude of z” is this: |z|
Paweł Cisło
Size of complex numbers
42%
Flag icon
Didya know that 1/i = -i? Just multiply both sides by i and see for yourself!
43%
Flag icon
Instead of z = a + bi, think about a number z* = a−bi, called the “complex conjugate”. It has the same real part, but is the “mirror image” in the imaginary dimension. The conjugate or “imaginary reflection” has the same magnitude, but the opposite angle!
Paweł Cisło
Complex conjugates
43%
Flag icon
Complex conjugates are indicated by a star (z*) or bar () above the number
43%
Flag icon
z = a + bi has the complex conjugate z* = a − bi
Paweł Cisło
Example of a complex conjugate
44%
Flag icon
The number should be |z|2 since we scaled by the size twice. Now let’s do an example: (3 + 4i) · (3−4i) = 9 − 16i2 = 25
Paweł Cisło
Multiplying conjugates ~> z * z*
44%
Flag icon
Rotate by opposite angle: multiply by (1 – i) instead of (1 + i) Divide by magnitude squared: divide by |√2|2 = 2
Paweł Cisło
Division
44%
Flag icon
The more traditional “plug and chug” method is to multiply top and bottom by the complex conjugate:
Paweł Cisło
Division - other approach
45%
Flag icon
there’s a few properties to consider: (x + y)* = x* + y* (x · y)* = x* · y*
46%
Flag icon
The conjugate is a way to “undo” a rotation.
46%
Flag icon
I deposited $3, $10, $15.75 and $23.50 into my account. What transaction will cancel these out? To find the opposite: add them up, and multiply by -1.
Paweł Cisło
Example of conjugate
46%
Flag icon
See the conjugate z* as a way to “cancel” the rotation effects of z, just like a negative number “cancels” the effects of addition. One caveat: with conjugates, you need to divide by |z| · |z| to remove the scaling effects as well.
47%
Flag icon
The mathematical constant e is the base of the natural logarithm.
Paweł Cisło
e
47%
Flag icon
The natural logarithm, formerly known as the hyperbolic logarithm, is the logarithm to the base e, where e is an irrational constant approximately equal to 2.718281828459.
Paweł Cisło
Natural log
47%
Flag icon
Pi is the ratio between circumference and diameter shared by all circles.
Paweł Cisło
Pi
48%
Flag icon
Pi is important and shows all circles are related, not to mention the trigonometric functions derived from circles (sin, cos, tan).
Paweł Cisło
Importance of Pi
48%
Flag icon
e is the base amount of growth shared by all continually growing processes.
Paweł Cisło
e definition from the author
48%
Flag icon
e shows up whenever systems grow exponentially and continuously: population, radioactive decay, interest calculations,
48%
Flag icon
Just like every number can be considered a “scaled” version of 1 (the base unit), every circle can be considered a “scaled” version of the unit circle (radius 1), and every rate of growth can be considered a “scaled” version of e (the “unit” rate of growth).
Paweł Cisło
Best way to understand e
49%
Flag icon
growth = 2x Said another way, doubling is 100% growth. We can rewrite our formula like this: growth = (1 + 100%)x It’s the same equation, but we separate “2” into what it really is: the original value (1) plus 100%. Clever, eh?
Paweł Cisło
Growth
49%
Flag icon
the general formula for x periods of return is: growth = (1 + return)x
50%
Flag icon
The growth of two half-periods of 50% is: growth = (1 + 100%/2)2 = 2.25
52%
Flag icon
e is defined to be that rate of growth if we continually compound 100% return on smaller and smaller time periods:
Paweł Cisło
When n is close to 1000, rate of growth converges to 2.71
53%
Flag icon
Sure, you start out expecting to grow from 1 to 2. But with each tiny step forward you create a little “dividend” that starts growing on its own. When all is said and done, you end up with e (2.718...) at the end of 1 time period, not 2.
Paweł Cisło
Why e is not = 2
53%
Flag icon
If we start with $2.00, we get 2e. If we start with $11.79, we get 11.79e.
53%
Flag icon
e is like a speed limit (like c, the speed of light) saying how fast you can possibly grow using a continuous process.
54%
Flag icon
Well, it’s just half the number of changes: (1+.01)50 = (1 + .01)100/2 = ((1 + .01)100)1/2 = e1/2
Paweł Cisło
Case of 50% annual grow
54%
Flag icon
Even though growth can look like addition (+1%), we need to remember that it’s really a multiplication (times 1.01).
54%
Flag icon
The key is that for any rate we pick, it’s just a new exponent on e: growth = erate
54%
Flag icon
Suppose we have 300% growth for 2 years. We’d multiply one year’s growth (e3) by itself two times: growth=(e3)2 = e6 And in general: growth = (erate)time = erate · time
Paweł Cisło
Different times
55%
Flag icon
When we write: ex the variable x is a combination of rate and time. x = rate · time
55%
Flag icon
10 years of 3% growth means 30 changes of 1%.
55%
Flag icon
growth = ex = ert If we have a return of r for t time periods, our net compound growth is ert
56%
Flag icon
Our rate is 100% every 24 hours, so after 10 days we get: 300 · e1 · 10 = 6.6 million kg
Paweł Cisło
Example of growth calculation
56%
Flag icon
Using the natural log we can deduce the initial rate of 100%.
57%
Flag icon
constantly slowing decay is the reverse of constantly compounding growth.