The Mysterious Affair at Styles (Hercule Poirot, #1)
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
Read between January 15 - January 20, 2025
1%
Flag icon
Lawrence, the younger, had been a delicate youth. He had qualified as a doctor but early relinquished the profession of medicine, and lived at home while pursuing literary ambitions; though his verses never had any marked success.
3%
Flag icon
Her tall, slender form, outlined against the bright light; the vivid sense of slumbering fire that seemed to find expression only in those wonderful tawny eyes of hers, remarkable eyes, different from any other woman’s that I have ever known; the intense power of stillness she possessed, which nevertheless conveyed the impression of a wild untamed spirit in an exquisitely civilised
3%
Flag icon
body—all these things are burnt into my memory. I shall never forget them.
7%
Flag icon
The sinister face of Dr. Bauerstein recurred to me unpleasantly. A vague suspicion of everyone and everything filled my mind. Just for a moment I had a premonition of approaching
7%
Flag icon
evil.
17%
Flag icon
Peril to the detective who says: ‘It is so small—it does not matter. It will not agree. I will forget it.’ That way lies confusion! Everything matters.”
17%
Flag icon
The dead woman had not the gift of commanding love. Her death was a shock and a distress, but she would not be passionately regretted.
26%
Flag icon
A “man of method” was, in Poirot’s estimation, the highest praise that could be bestowed on any individual.
38%
Flag icon
Imagination is a good servant, and a bad master. The simplest explanation is always the most likely.”
39%
Flag icon
“What have I always told you? Everything must be taken into account. If the fact will not fit the theory—let the theory go.”
52%
Flag icon
“Mon ami,” replied Poirot gravely, “when you find that people are not telling you the truth—look out!
79%
Flag icon
“Every murderer is probably somebody’s old friend,” observed Poirot philosophically. “You cannot mix up sentiment and reason.”
99%
Flag icon
Who on earth but Poirot would have thought of a trial for murder as a restorer of conjugal happiness!