Bioethics: What Everyone Needs to Know ®
Rate it:
Open Preview
39%
Flag icon
Once a fetus can experience pain, it has an interest in not experiencing pain, and we have a reason to do what we can to avoid the unnecessary infliction of pain on the fetus.
39%
Flag icon
anesthesia
39%
Flag icon
the reasons for having an abortion should be stronger in the case of late abortions than in t...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
39%
Flag icon
Simply not wanting to have a child is a perfectly good reason to terminate a pregnancy in the early stages, but in the later stages, a stronger justification, such as a risk to the woman’s heal...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
39%
Flag icon
Thus, the interest view is a gradualist view that has the advantage of cohering with the most people’s strong intuition that late abortions require...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
40%
Flag icon
Both conservatives and liberals seem committed to the view that abortion is morally the same throughout pregnancy, a view that conflicts with most people’s views and common sense.
40%
Flag icon
On the interest view, the sentient fetus has moral standing, but so does the pregnant woman. In general, her interests count for more because she is a full-fledged person, with interests that go far beyond not experiencing pain. Her interests stem from her projects, values, and relationships with others. These are not the kinds of interests that a fetus can have,
40%
Flag icon
We can ascribe to the sentient fetus not merely an interest in avoiding pain, but also an interest, albeit a weak one, in continuing to exist.
40%
Flag icon
reason for preserving its life when this does not conflict with the woman’s important interests.
40%
Flag icon
in the United States, only 1.2 percent of all abortions occur at or after twenty-one weeks.
40%
Flag icon
the justifiability of abortion rests not only on whether the fetus is a person, with a right to life, but also on whether the fetus has a right to what it needs to stay alive: namely, the body of the pregnant woman.
40%
Flag icon
To show that we can differentiate between the right to life and the right to use another person’s body, Thomson assumes, for the sake of argument, that the fetus is a person with a right to life.
40%
Flag icon
the Famous Violinist.
Brendan  Lalor
Take note of the thought experiment AND the argument based on it.
40%
Flag icon
to stay attached
40%
Flag icon
would be very nice of you
40%
Flag icon
but
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
40%
Flag icon
simply having a right to life does not entitle you to whatever you need to stay alive.
40%
Flag icon
Pregnancy can impose serious burdens on the woman: physical, emotional, economic.12 We may have moral obligations to others to keep them alive when we can do so without undergoing serious burdens, but making huge sacrifices to save someone else’s life is above and beyond the call of duty.
40%
Flag icon
it may be objected that the fetus does have the right to the woman’s body because she is (partly) responsible for its being there.
Brendan  Lalor
Counterargument to Thompson
40%
Flag icon
this would be true only of voluntary intercourse.
Brendan  Lalor
S&M's response
40%
Flag icon
Can Thomson claim that even when the pregnancy results from voluntary intercourse,
41%
Flag icon
if the woman has acted responsibly and done what is reasonably expected of her to prevent the existence of the fetus (i.e., has used contraception), then she cannot be held responsible for its presence.
41%
Flag icon
Others think that she is responsible since contraceptive failure is known to occur.
41%
Flag icon
Thomson’s argument provides a very limited defense of abortion, however, since in most cases the woman is (partly) responsible for becoming pregnant.
41%
Flag icon
Combining the view of moral status provided by the interest view with bodily self-determination provides a stronger justification for abortion than either argument alone.
41%
Flag icon
our view
70%
Flag icon
prevention
70%
Flag icon
treatment
70%
Flag icon
enhance
70%
Flag icon
somatic cell
70%
Flag icon
Somatic cell gene therapy is experimental and is only used for serious diseases when there is no better alternative.
70%
Flag icon
Germline gene therapy
70%
Flag icon
is prohibited in the United States, in many European countries, in China, and in many countries around the world.
70%
Flag icon
If it could be done safely
70%
Flag icon
HHGE thus holds the promise of eradicating some genetic diseases from the face of the earth within a few generations.
70%
Flag icon
and
70%
Flag icon
harmful side effects would also b...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
71%
Flag icon
Some well-known monogenic disorders are Huntington’s disease, Tay-Sachs disease, sickle cell disease, and cystic fibrosis.
71%
Flag icon
some forms of blindness, breast and ovarian cancer, and early-onset Alzheimer’s.
71%
Flag icon
lung cancer.
71%
Flag icon
CRISPR-based treatments for genetic disorders have the potential to be used in thousands of conditions caused by specific inherited mutations.
71%
Flag icon
edit a human embryo.
71%
Flag icon
to splice out a mutation
71%
Flag icon
That
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
71%
Flag icon
is the cause of a deadl...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
71%
Flag icon
embryos
71%
Flag icon
never intended for implantation.
71%
Flag icon
whether the therapy would have prevented the disease in a child, had the embryo been implanted and gone to term.
71%
Flag icon
unintended harmful side effects.
71%
Flag icon
unwanted changes