Bioethics: What Everyone Needs to Know ®
Rate it:
Open Preview
36%
Flag icon
implantation,
36%
Flag icon
clinical pregnancy
36%
Flag icon
born human being
36%
Flag icon
twinning
36%
Flag icon
all of us begin as distinct individuals only after twinning is no longer possible.
36%
Flag icon
Extreme conservatives
36%
Flag icon
not even in the case of rape, fetal indications, or to preserve the life of the pregnant woman.
36%
Flag icon
Moderate conservatives
36%
Flag icon
rape,
36%
Flag icon
threat to her health.
36%
Flag icon
fetal indications,
36%
Flag icon
anencephaly,
36%
Flag icon
trisomy 18
36%
Flag icon
Moderate conservatives think that abortion is not justifiable if the child can have a life worth living—that is, a life that, despite severe impairments, will be of value to the child.
36%
Flag icon
Down syndrome
37%
Flag icon
liberals
37%
Flag icon
base their support of abortion primarily on
37%
Flag icon
rights to bodily self-determination and equality
37%
Flag icon
Throughout most of gestation, the fetus cannot feel or experience anything and is therefore not the kind of being who is owed protection.
37%
Flag icon
Warren.
37%
Flag icon
According to Warren, it is in virtue of certain psychological characteristics that we are persons.
37%
Flag icon
sentience,
37%
Flag icon
self-consci...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
37%
Flag icon
rationality,
37%
Flag icon
moral agency
37%
Flag icon
A conservative might
37%
Flag icon
think that even if being biologically human is not necessary for personhood, it is sufficient.
37%
Flag icon
pain perception highly unlikely much earlier than near the end of the second trimester.
37%
Flag icon
Since the early fetus is not a person, not yet “one of us,” abortion at least in the first trimester is permissible whenever a woman does not want to have a child.
37%
Flag icon
The view that abortion is seriously morally wrong because of the potential of the fetus to become a person is called
37%
Flag icon
“the potentiality principle.”
37%
Flag icon
if a being potentially has the characteristics of a person, then it now has the rights that persons have.
38%
Flag icon
The person view, it seems, does not merely justify abortion, but also infanticide, implying that parents should be permitted to kill unwanted newborns. That conclusion seems completely unacceptable.
Brendan  Lalor
S&M implicitly use infanticide as a test -- and Warren's view fails.
38%
Flag icon
what makes killing wrong is that it deprives the one who is killed of
38%
Flag icon
a future of value.
38%
Flag icon
early fetuses can’t feel or think. They do not need to be personlike now in order to have a valuable future.
39%
Flag icon
lying
Brendan  Lalor
Between “lying” and truth are other possibilities
39%
Flag icon
perhaps the important question is not
39%
Flag icon
what
39%
Flag icon
am I essentially, or even when did I beg...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
39%
Flag icon
when
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
39%
Flag icon
did I acquire the features that endow a being wi...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
39%
Flag icon
when moral agents are deciding how they ought to act, they are morally required to consider the interests of all beings who will be affected by the decision.
39%
Flag icon
Having interests is a necessary condition for having moral status;
39%
Flag icon
Cars are different from pets in this respect.
39%
Flag icon
The interest view links moral standing to interests and interests to sentience.
39%
Flag icon
sentience as the most basic element and sufficient for minimal moral status.
39%
Flag icon
on the interest view, prior to the onset of sentience, fetuses have no moral standing
39%
Flag icon
but
39%
Flag icon
they have great importance and moral value to expectant parents