Debut Author Snapshot: Hannah Kent
Posted by Goodreads on August 27, 2013
When not working on her second novel, Kent is completing her doctorate at Flinders University in Adelaide, Australia, where she also teaches creative writing. She shares her inspiration for re-creating the bleak and arduous conditions of daily life in rural 19th-century Iceland.
Goodreads: Iceland is a long way from Australia! Tell us how you first became interested in Iceland and Agnes Magnúsdóttir.
Hannah Kent: I lived in Iceland for a year as an exchange student, about ten years ago. I had finished high school in Australia and, restless to go somewhere "different" before I settled down to further study, applied for a Rotary exchange. I asked to be considered for countries known for their winters; I was determined to see snow for the first time. As a result, in 2003, I was sent to a small fishing town in the north of Iceland.
The first few months of my exchange were difficult for me. My homesickness was compounded by the long hours of darkness, and I struggled with being the "outsider" in town, with all the conspicuity and social isolation that entailed. It was during this time that my host parents drove me through a very striking valley called Vatnsdalur. Astonished by the hundreds of small hills that rose up at its entrance, I asked them if the place was significant for any reason. They replied that it had been the site of Iceland's last execution. A woman called Agnes Magnúsdóttir had been beheaded there for her role in the murder of two sleeping men.
Perhaps I saw something of my own loneliness in the story of a woman cast out of society, because I immediately became deeply curious about Agnes. What circumstances had contributed to her death upon those strange hills? What sort of woman had she been? As my exchange continued and I fell in love with Iceland, my desire to understand this historical figure continued. In the years that followed I tried to find out as much as I could about her and was struck by the way she was often portrayed in unequivocal terms: as black hearted and evil. Burial Rites was written out of a desire to undo the popular stereotype of Agnes as a monster. I wanted to discover a little of her ambiguity, her complexity, and her humanity.
GR: One Goodreads reviewer writes, "Burial Rites suggests that truth is open to interpretation and is rarely as straightforward as commonly perceived." Do you agree? How do you view the relationship between fiction and truth telling?
HK: I agree wholeheartedly! How easy it is to forget that history is penned by a human hand and subjective to bias, prejudice, politics, and various ideologies. It is imperfect and fallible. Many of the early historical sources I read about Agnes Magnúsdóttir—and the murders she was accused of—claimed that she was a "spider," a "witch," and a "devil." These sources claimed to be truthful, and yet to my eyes they were clearly influenced by the (archaic) notion that if a woman is not an angel, she is a demon. They didn't discuss the social, political, or cultural conditions that might have contributed toward a servant woman's involvement in the murder of her employer.
The more research I conducted into the events involving Agnes Magnúsdóttir's trial and execution, the more I came to understand the difficulty of establishing a singular truth. Errors and contradictions abounded. Some sources actually got the execution date wrong. I came across completely different accounts of Agnes's priest's behavior at the execution. Had I been writing a book of nonfiction, it might have been problematic, but in literature emotional truth is more important than factual truth.
A novelist is not obligated to always get the facts right, but if he or she wishes to suggest that something is truthful, he or she must also alert the reader to the fact that it is merely an interpretation. Burial Rites is an interpretation of historical events that presents certain emotional truths, but in many ways it's as imperfect a retelling as the nonfiction sources it contests because it is informed by my own contemporariness and my own belief system. It's researched, but it's subjective.
GR: You conducted extensive research as part of your doctoral work, not only into Agnes's history, but also what it was like to live in Iceland in the 1800s. What key details helped bring the setting alive in your mind?
HK: Living in Australia, I found it was initially very difficult to access the sources I needed to research Agnes's life. While I waited for an opportunity to travel to Iceland and visit the national museums and archives, I spent a great deal of time reading everything I could get my hands on about life in early 19th-century Iceland. I devoured history books, the sagas and fiction by authors such as Halldór Laxness, and read academic articles about everything from smallpox epidemics to infant mortality statistics to sheep-grazing techniques. Recipes for moss porridge and blood sausage, old newspapers, poetry, song lyrics—if it was about Iceland, I read it! It was an enjoyable process, but a slow one, as a great deal of my material required translation.
The most useful resources I discovered were diaries and journals written by foreign scientists visiting Iceland in the early 1800s. Most of my questions concerned mundane domestic information—What did people eat? Did the men shave? How did they celebrate Christmas? Did they use chamber pots, and if so, were they wood and how heavy would a full one be?—and I found my answers in the private observations of British gentlemen touring the country in search of geysers. Being unaccustomed to the Icelandic way of life, they remarked and noted down a great deal of information that Icelanders—accepting it all as unremarkable—did not. They described the way families and servants all slept in one room; they complained about bedbugs and the audible scratching of their hosts keeping them awake at night; the disrepair of many churches; the Icelanders' habits of taking snuff, saddling their horses, removing their guests' shoes, storing their urine for cleaning wool... In between the scientists' very dull description of sulphur deposits and geyser explosions I'd find gems of descriptive detail. They painted a very vivid picture of life back then.
GR: What's next for you as a writer?
HK: I'm currently researching my next book, which will be set in Ireland (a place I've always been fascinated with) in the early 19th century. In Burial Rites I was able to have a little play with superstition and folklore, but this novel will be more firmly focused on these subjects. I've always been very interested in the way in which disempowered individuals have used superstitious beliefs to emancipate themselves and subjugate others. The novel I'm writing now will explore the allure and consequences of this.
Comments Showing 1-29 of 29 (29 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Diana
(new)
Aug 28, 2013 07:07PM

reply
|
flag



the research of the life and times is flawless and the sensory immersion complete. Thank you Hannah. I look forward to your next novel.



.





Looks like a great book for our book club. Thanks for the background information.





